在伴有稳定胸痛的新生患者中,脂蛋白(a)升高与存在显著冠状动脉狭窄独立相关。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Gitte Stokvad Brix, Laust Dupont Rasmussen, Palle Duun Rohde, Louise Nissen, Mette Nyegaard, Michelle Louise O'Donoghue, Morten Bøttcher, Simon Winther
{"title":"在伴有稳定胸痛的新生患者中,脂蛋白(a)升高与存在显著冠状动脉狭窄独立相关。","authors":"Gitte Stokvad Brix, Laust Dupont Rasmussen, Palle Duun Rohde, Louise Nissen, Mette Nyegaard, Michelle Louise O'Donoghue, Morten Bøttcher, Simon Winther","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in the risk-assessment of patients with de-novo stable chest pain is sparsely investigated. We assessed the association between Lp(a) concentration and the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography in a broad population of patients referred with stable chest pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lp(a) measurements and coronary CT angiography were performed in 4,346 patients with stable chest pain and no previous history of coronary artery disease. The patients were included in the trial program, the Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary artery disease, Dan-NICAD. The prevalence and odds ratios for stenosis were calculated comparing normal Lp(a) (< 20 nmol/l) with moderately elevated (20 to <125 nmol/l), high (125 to <200 nmol/l), and very high (≥200 nmol/l) Lp(a) concentrations in both univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2,418 (55.6%), 1,276 (29.4%), 425 (9.8%), and 227 (5.2%) patients had normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) levels, respectively. The prevalences of coronary stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 569 (23.5%), n = 328 (25.7%), n = 129 (30.4%), and n = 77 (33.9%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). Likewise, the prevalence of patients with multivessel disease increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 252 (10.4%), n = 149 (11.7%), n = 61 (14.4%), and n = 41 (18.1%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). In an unadjusted model, odds ratios for stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentrations (odds ratio (95% CI): 1.12 (0.96-1.31), 1.42 (1.13-1.77), and 1.67 (1.24-2.22) for moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) versus normal Lp(a), respectively). Adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors did not affect the association.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In stable, symptomatic patients without established coronary artery disease, Lp(a) levels are positively associated with the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography. These findings may warrant using Lp(a) in the diagnostic management of patient with suspected coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The three studies within the Dan-NICAD program are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: Dan-NICAD, NCT02264717, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02264717?term=dan-nicad&rank=1. Dan-NICAD 2, NCT03481712, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481712?term=dan-nicad&rank=3. Dan-NICAD 3, NCT04707859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04707859?term=dan-nicad&rank=2.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated lipoprotein(a) is independently associated with the presence of significant coronary stenosis in de-novo patients with stable chest pain.\",\"authors\":\"Gitte Stokvad Brix, Laust Dupont Rasmussen, Palle Duun Rohde, Louise Nissen, Mette Nyegaard, Michelle Louise O'Donoghue, Morten Bøttcher, Simon Winther\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in the risk-assessment of patients with de-novo stable chest pain is sparsely investigated. We assessed the association between Lp(a) concentration and the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography in a broad population of patients referred with stable chest pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lp(a) measurements and coronary CT angiography were performed in 4,346 patients with stable chest pain and no previous history of coronary artery disease. The patients were included in the trial program, the Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary artery disease, Dan-NICAD. The prevalence and odds ratios for stenosis were calculated comparing normal Lp(a) (< 20 nmol/l) with moderately elevated (20 to <125 nmol/l), high (125 to <200 nmol/l), and very high (≥200 nmol/l) Lp(a) concentrations in both univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2,418 (55.6%), 1,276 (29.4%), 425 (9.8%), and 227 (5.2%) patients had normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) levels, respectively. The prevalences of coronary stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 569 (23.5%), n = 328 (25.7%), n = 129 (30.4%), and n = 77 (33.9%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). Likewise, the prevalence of patients with multivessel disease increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 252 (10.4%), n = 149 (11.7%), n = 61 (14.4%), and n = 41 (18.1%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). In an unadjusted model, odds ratios for stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentrations (odds ratio (95% CI): 1.12 (0.96-1.31), 1.42 (1.13-1.77), and 1.67 (1.24-2.22) for moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) versus normal Lp(a), respectively). Adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors did not affect the association.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In stable, symptomatic patients without established coronary artery disease, Lp(a) levels are positively associated with the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography. These findings may warrant using Lp(a) in the diagnostic management of patient with suspected coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The three studies within the Dan-NICAD program are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: Dan-NICAD, NCT02264717, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02264717?term=dan-nicad&rank=1. Dan-NICAD 2, NCT03481712, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481712?term=dan-nicad&rank=3. Dan-NICAD 3, NCT04707859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04707859?term=dan-nicad&rank=2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂蛋白(a) (Lp(a))在新生稳定胸痛患者风险评估中的作用研究较少。我们评估了Lp(a)浓度与冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影显示的冠状动脉狭窄之间的关系。方法:对4346例稳定胸痛且无冠状动脉疾病史的患者进行Lp(a)测量和冠状动脉CT血管造影。这些患者被纳入丹麦冠状动脉疾病无创检测研究(Dan-NICAD)的试验项目。比较正常Lp(a) (< 20 nmol/l)和中度升高(20 nmol/l),计算狭窄的患病率和优势比。结果:共有2418例(55.6%)、1276例(29.4%)、425例(9.8%)和227例(5.2%)患者Lp(a)水平正常、中度升高、高和极高。冠状动脉狭窄的发生率随着Lp(a)浓度的增加而增加(在Lp(a)正常、中等升高、高、极高的患者中,n = 569 (23.5%),n = 328 (25.7%),n = 129 (30.4%),n = 77(33.9%))。同样,多血管疾病患者的患病率随着Lp(a)浓度的增加而增加(在Lp(a)正常、中等升高、高和非常高的患者中,n = 252(10.4%)、n = 149(11.7%)、n = 61(14.4%)和n = 41(18.1%))。在未调整的模型中,狭窄的优势比随着Lp(a)浓度的增加而增加(优势比(95% CI)分别为中度升高、高和极高Lp(a)与正常Lp(a)的1.12(0.96-1.31)、1.42(1.13-1.77)和1.67(1.24-2.22))。调整年龄、性别和心血管危险因素对相关性没有影响。结论:在稳定、无冠状动脉疾病症状的患者中,Lp(a)水平与冠状动脉CT血管造影显示的冠状动脉狭窄呈正相关。这些发现可能证明在疑似冠状动脉疾病患者的诊断管理中使用Lp(a)是合理的。试验注册:Dan-NICAD项目中的三项研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册:Dan-NICAD, NCT02264717, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02264717?term=dan-nicad&rank=1。Dan-NICAD 2, NCT03481712, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481712?term=dan-nicad&rank=3。Dan-NICAD 3, NCT04707859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04707859?term=dan-nicad&rank=2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elevated lipoprotein(a) is independently associated with the presence of significant coronary stenosis in de-novo patients with stable chest pain.

Background: The role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in the risk-assessment of patients with de-novo stable chest pain is sparsely investigated. We assessed the association between Lp(a) concentration and the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography in a broad population of patients referred with stable chest pain.

Methods: Lp(a) measurements and coronary CT angiography were performed in 4,346 patients with stable chest pain and no previous history of coronary artery disease. The patients were included in the trial program, the Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary artery disease, Dan-NICAD. The prevalence and odds ratios for stenosis were calculated comparing normal Lp(a) (< 20 nmol/l) with moderately elevated (20 to <125 nmol/l), high (125 to <200 nmol/l), and very high (≥200 nmol/l) Lp(a) concentrations in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: In total, 2,418 (55.6%), 1,276 (29.4%), 425 (9.8%), and 227 (5.2%) patients had normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) levels, respectively. The prevalences of coronary stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 569 (23.5%), n = 328 (25.7%), n = 129 (30.4%), and n = 77 (33.9%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). Likewise, the prevalence of patients with multivessel disease increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 252 (10.4%), n = 149 (11.7%), n = 61 (14.4%), and n = 41 (18.1%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). In an unadjusted model, odds ratios for stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentrations (odds ratio (95% CI): 1.12 (0.96-1.31), 1.42 (1.13-1.77), and 1.67 (1.24-2.22) for moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) versus normal Lp(a), respectively). Adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors did not affect the association.

Conclusions: In stable, symptomatic patients without established coronary artery disease, Lp(a) levels are positively associated with the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography. These findings may warrant using Lp(a) in the diagnostic management of patient with suspected coronary artery disease.

Trial registration: The three studies within the Dan-NICAD program are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: Dan-NICAD, NCT02264717, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02264717?term=dan-nicad&rank=1. Dan-NICAD 2, NCT03481712, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481712?term=dan-nicad&rank=3. Dan-NICAD 3, NCT04707859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04707859?term=dan-nicad&rank=2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信