使用自来水冲洗肠内管。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
American Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18
Marie-Eline Blondin
{"title":"使用自来水冲洗肠内管。","authors":"Marie-Eline Blondin","doi":"10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Embase, and JBI was conducted to review current evidence and professional organization recommendations on the use of sterile water versus tap water in enteral feeding tubes. The oncology institution's policies were reviewed, and nurses were surveyed on the type of water they used for enteral tube flushes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the literature search and nurse survey results concurred that tap water was as effective as sterile water, the institution's nursing practice policy was updated to state that tap water should be used for enteral tube flushes, and that the use of sterile water for this purpose should be reserved for cases when there are concerns about tap water safety. This policy change was projected to incur annual sterile water cost savings of $15,930 to $19,872.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a policy recommending the use of tap water for enteral tube flushes standardized clinical practice and decreased institutional costs while maintaining patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":"124 12","pages":"46-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Tap Water for Enteral Tube Flushes.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Eline Blondin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Embase, and JBI was conducted to review current evidence and professional organization recommendations on the use of sterile water versus tap water in enteral feeding tubes. The oncology institution's policies were reviewed, and nurses were surveyed on the type of water they used for enteral tube flushes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the literature search and nurse survey results concurred that tap water was as effective as sterile water, the institution's nursing practice policy was updated to state that tap water should be used for enteral tube flushes, and that the use of sterile water for this purpose should be reserved for cases when there are concerns about tap water safety. This policy change was projected to incur annual sterile water cost savings of $15,930 to $19,872.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a policy recommending the use of tap water for enteral tube flushes standardized clinical practice and decreased institutional costs while maintaining patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"124 12\",\"pages\":\"46-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠内喂养管用于需要肠内营养或药物的患者,需要在药物和喂养之间冲洗以保持通畅。各种类型的水可用于冲洗肠内喂食管,这就提出了哪种类型的水最能得到证据支持的问题。目的:本质量改进项目的目的是审查使用自来水代替无菌水进行肠内管冲洗的证据,并在一个多地点肿瘤机构实施使用自来水作为无菌水的安全、具有成本效益的替代品。方法:系统检索Scopus、PubMed、CINAHL、谷歌Scholar、Embase和JBI等电子数据库,回顾无菌水与自来水在肠内喂养管中使用的现有证据和专业组织建议。对肿瘤机构的政策进行了审查,并对护士用于肠内管冲洗的水的类型进行了调查。结果:在文献检索和护士调查结果一致认为自来水和无菌水一样有效后,该机构的护理实践政策更新为自来水应用于肠内管冲洗,并且在有自来水安全问题的情况下应保留使用无菌水。这一政策变化预计每年可节省15 930美元至19 872美元的无菌水费用。结论:建议使用自来水进行肠内管冲洗的政策的实施规范了临床实践,降低了机构成本,同时维护了患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Tap Water for Enteral Tube Flushes.

Background: Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.

Purpose: The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.

Methods: A systematic literature search of electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Embase, and JBI was conducted to review current evidence and professional organization recommendations on the use of sterile water versus tap water in enteral feeding tubes. The oncology institution's policies were reviewed, and nurses were surveyed on the type of water they used for enteral tube flushes.

Results: After the literature search and nurse survey results concurred that tap water was as effective as sterile water, the institution's nursing practice policy was updated to state that tap water should be used for enteral tube flushes, and that the use of sterile water for this purpose should be reserved for cases when there are concerns about tap water safety. This policy change was projected to incur annual sterile water cost savings of $15,930 to $19,872.

Conclusion: The implementation of a policy recommending the use of tap water for enteral tube flushes standardized clinical practice and decreased institutional costs while maintaining patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
604
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/). AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com. AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信