{"title":"使用自来水冲洗肠内管。","authors":"Marie-Eline Blondin","doi":"10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Embase, and JBI was conducted to review current evidence and professional organization recommendations on the use of sterile water versus tap water in enteral feeding tubes. The oncology institution's policies were reviewed, and nurses were surveyed on the type of water they used for enteral tube flushes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the literature search and nurse survey results concurred that tap water was as effective as sterile water, the institution's nursing practice policy was updated to state that tap water should be used for enteral tube flushes, and that the use of sterile water for this purpose should be reserved for cases when there are concerns about tap water safety. This policy change was projected to incur annual sterile water cost savings of $15,930 to $19,872.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a policy recommending the use of tap water for enteral tube flushes standardized clinical practice and decreased institutional costs while maintaining patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":"124 12","pages":"46-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Tap Water for Enteral Tube Flushes.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Eline Blondin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Embase, and JBI was conducted to review current evidence and professional organization recommendations on the use of sterile water versus tap water in enteral feeding tubes. The oncology institution's policies were reviewed, and nurses were surveyed on the type of water they used for enteral tube flushes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the literature search and nurse survey results concurred that tap water was as effective as sterile water, the institution's nursing practice policy was updated to state that tap water should be used for enteral tube flushes, and that the use of sterile water for this purpose should be reserved for cases when there are concerns about tap water safety. This policy change was projected to incur annual sterile water cost savings of $15,930 to $19,872.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a policy recommending the use of tap water for enteral tube flushes standardized clinical practice and decreased institutional costs while maintaining patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"124 12\",\"pages\":\"46-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095232.43682.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.
Purpose: The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.
Methods: A systematic literature search of electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Embase, and JBI was conducted to review current evidence and professional organization recommendations on the use of sterile water versus tap water in enteral feeding tubes. The oncology institution's policies were reviewed, and nurses were surveyed on the type of water they used for enteral tube flushes.
Results: After the literature search and nurse survey results concurred that tap water was as effective as sterile water, the institution's nursing practice policy was updated to state that tap water should be used for enteral tube flushes, and that the use of sterile water for this purpose should be reserved for cases when there are concerns about tap water safety. This policy change was projected to incur annual sterile water cost savings of $15,930 to $19,872.
Conclusion: The implementation of a policy recommending the use of tap water for enteral tube flushes standardized clinical practice and decreased institutional costs while maintaining patient safety.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/).
AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com.
AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.