淋巴细胞缺失的神秘病例:一个警示故事,在机构间差异的结果肺分离方案。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Olivia S Harlow, Vijay Raaj Ravi, Fang Ke, Nathan L Sanders, Elise Armstrong, Joseph P Mizgerd, Anukul T Shenoy
{"title":"淋巴细胞缺失的神秘病例:一个警示故事,在机构间差异的结果肺分离方案。","authors":"Olivia S Harlow, Vijay Raaj Ravi, Fang Ke, Nathan L Sanders, Elise Armstrong, Joseph P Mizgerd, Anukul T Shenoy","doi":"10.1152/ajplung.00323.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, we share our brand-new lab's experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation at Boston University (BU) fails to reproduce similar CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell, and B cell outcomes at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (U-M). We report that the type 2 collagenase-based protocol from BU yields reduced numbers of lung lymphocytes at U-M, and this appeared to be a result of harsher collagenase activity despite using identical protocols, reagents, and vendors at both institutions. This variability could not be explained by higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> levels in Ann Arbor water (which we posited may heighten the collagenase activity) but instead appeared to be due to technical details within the protocol that led to the protocols behaving in an institution-specific manner. Indeed, we find that merely switching between the protocol from BU and a newly optimized protocol at U-M was sufficient to improve (or worsen) lymphocyte yields from murine lungs when synchronously performed at both institutions. Taken together, although the reason(s) for the interinstitutional variability in lymphocyte outcomes remains unknown, this report serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting lung dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization, and calls for careful inspection of cross-institutional reproducibility of previously described protocols.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, the authors share their experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation in one institution failed to reproduce similar lymphocyte outcomes elsewhere. This report, thus, serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting tissue dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7593,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology","volume":" ","pages":"L260-L266"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mysterious case of missing lymphocytes: a cautionary tale of interinstitutional variability in outcomes of lung dissociation protocols.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia S Harlow, Vijay Raaj Ravi, Fang Ke, Nathan L Sanders, Elise Armstrong, Joseph P Mizgerd, Anukul T Shenoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajplung.00323.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, we share our brand-new lab's experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation at Boston University (BU) fails to reproduce similar CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell, and B cell outcomes at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (U-M). We report that the type 2 collagenase-based protocol from BU yields reduced numbers of lung lymphocytes at U-M, and this appeared to be a result of harsher collagenase activity despite using identical protocols, reagents, and vendors at both institutions. This variability could not be explained by higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> levels in Ann Arbor water (which we posited may heighten the collagenase activity) but instead appeared to be due to technical details within the protocol that led to the protocols behaving in an institution-specific manner. Indeed, we find that merely switching between the protocol from BU and a newly optimized protocol at U-M was sufficient to improve (or worsen) lymphocyte yields from murine lungs when synchronously performed at both institutions. Taken together, although the reason(s) for the interinstitutional variability in lymphocyte outcomes remains unknown, this report serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting lung dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization, and calls for careful inspection of cross-institutional reproducibility of previously described protocols.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, the authors share their experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation in one institution failed to reproduce similar lymphocyte outcomes elsewhere. This report, thus, serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting tissue dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"L260-L266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00323.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00323.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严谨和可重复性对科学进步至关重要。目前尚不清楚在一个机构中优化组织解离的方案是否普遍表现良好。在这里,我们分享了我们全新的实验室在机构间差异方面的经验,这些经验导致了波士顿大学(BU)优化的小鼠肺解离方案无法在密歇根大学安娜堡分校(U-M)复制类似的CD4+ T细胞,CD8+ T细胞和B细胞结果。我们报告说,来自BU的基于2型胶原酶的方案在U-M的肺淋巴细胞数量减少,这似乎是由于更严格的胶原酶活性,尽管在两个机构使用相同的方案、试剂和供应商。这种可变性不能用安娜堡水中较高的Ca2+水平来解释(我们假设这可能会提高胶原酶活性),而似乎是由于协议中的技术细节导致协议以机构特定的方式运行。事实上,我们发现仅仅在BU方案和U-M新优化方案之间切换就足以提高(或降低)小鼠肺部淋巴细胞产量,当两个机构同步执行时。综上所述,尽管机构间淋巴细胞结果差异的原因尚不清楚,但该报告警示人们不要在没有重新优化的情况下直接跨机构采用肺分离方案,并呼吁仔细检查先前描述的方案的跨机构可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The mysterious case of missing lymphocytes: a cautionary tale of interinstitutional variability in outcomes of lung dissociation protocols.

Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, we share our brand-new lab's experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation at Boston University (BU) fails to reproduce similar CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, and B cell outcomes at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (U-M). We report that the type 2 collagenase-based protocol from BU yields reduced numbers of lung lymphocytes at U-M, and this appeared to be a result of harsher collagenase activity despite using identical protocols, reagents, and vendors at both institutions. This variability could not be explained by higher Ca2+ levels in Ann Arbor water (which we posited may heighten the collagenase activity) but instead appeared to be due to technical details within the protocol that led to the protocols behaving in an institution-specific manner. Indeed, we find that merely switching between the protocol from BU and a newly optimized protocol at U-M was sufficient to improve (or worsen) lymphocyte yields from murine lungs when synchronously performed at both institutions. Taken together, although the reason(s) for the interinstitutional variability in lymphocyte outcomes remains unknown, this report serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting lung dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization, and calls for careful inspection of cross-institutional reproducibility of previously described protocols.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, the authors share their experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation in one institution failed to reproduce similar lymphocyte outcomes elsewhere. This report, thus, serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting tissue dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology publishes original research covering the broad scope of molecular, cellular, and integrative aspects of normal and abnormal function of cells and components of the respiratory system. Areas of interest include conducting airways, pulmonary circulation, lung endothelial and epithelial cells, the pleura, neuroendocrine and immunologic cells in the lung, neural cells involved in control of breathing, and cells of the diaphragm and thoracic muscles. The processes to be covered in the Journal include gas-exchange, metabolic control at the cellular level, intracellular signaling, gene expression, genomics, macromolecules and their turnover, cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, cell motility, secretory mechanisms, membrane function, surfactant, matrix components, mucus and lining materials, lung defenses, macrophage function, transport of salt, water and protein, development and differentiation of the respiratory system, and response to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信