印度尼西亚水泥和预拌混凝土生产生命周期库存的比较分析

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rudi Setiadji Agustiningtyas, Hiroto Takaguchi, Tetsu Kubota, Muhammad Nur Fajri Alfata, Usep Surahman
{"title":"印度尼西亚水泥和预拌混凝土生产生命周期库存的比较分析","authors":"Rudi Setiadji Agustiningtyas,&nbsp;Hiroto Takaguchi,&nbsp;Tetsu Kubota,&nbsp;Muhammad Nur Fajri Alfata,&nbsp;Usep Surahman","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02135-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development of civil infrastructure in 2016–2021 increased cement and concrete consumption across Indonesia. The reduction of global warming effects can be expedited by providing environmentally friendly cement and concrete alternatives complemented with embodied energy and carbon assessment references. In this study, we investigated the local embodied energy and carbon emission with a boundary of cradle-to-gate for cements and that of cradle-to-site for ready-mix concretes in Indonesia. The production process data were collected from cement manufacturers and ready-mix concrete companies. The analysis starts with the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and non-OPC cement, and continues to the lightweight OPC concrete and the normal-weight blended concrete. The embodied energy and carbon were quantified. The results showed that those of OPC were the highest, followed by the non-OPC cement of Portland pozzolan cement (PPC), the Portland cement composite (PCC), and the masonry cement. The available low-energy and carbon concrete mixes were found to be a combination of a high-range water reducer admixture, a supplementary cementitious material (SCM), and cement. The lightweight OPC concrete had similar embodied energy with the reference OPC concrete, but its embodied carbon was up to 11.1% lower than the reference OPC. The normal-weight blended PCC concrete with optimum SCM levels reduced embodied energy and carbon by 53.8% and 58.2%, respectively, compared to the reference OPC concrete. The reference PPC concrete is considered an alternative for assessing the embodied energy and carbon of blended concrete in the building design stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"488 - 502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02135-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of life cycle inventory of cement and ready-mix concrete production in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Rudi Setiadji Agustiningtyas,&nbsp;Hiroto Takaguchi,&nbsp;Tetsu Kubota,&nbsp;Muhammad Nur Fajri Alfata,&nbsp;Usep Surahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02135-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The development of civil infrastructure in 2016–2021 increased cement and concrete consumption across Indonesia. The reduction of global warming effects can be expedited by providing environmentally friendly cement and concrete alternatives complemented with embodied energy and carbon assessment references. In this study, we investigated the local embodied energy and carbon emission with a boundary of cradle-to-gate for cements and that of cradle-to-site for ready-mix concretes in Indonesia. The production process data were collected from cement manufacturers and ready-mix concrete companies. The analysis starts with the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and non-OPC cement, and continues to the lightweight OPC concrete and the normal-weight blended concrete. The embodied energy and carbon were quantified. The results showed that those of OPC were the highest, followed by the non-OPC cement of Portland pozzolan cement (PPC), the Portland cement composite (PCC), and the masonry cement. The available low-energy and carbon concrete mixes were found to be a combination of a high-range water reducer admixture, a supplementary cementitious material (SCM), and cement. The lightweight OPC concrete had similar embodied energy with the reference OPC concrete, but its embodied carbon was up to 11.1% lower than the reference OPC. The normal-weight blended PCC concrete with optimum SCM levels reduced embodied energy and carbon by 53.8% and 58.2%, respectively, compared to the reference OPC concrete. The reference PPC concrete is considered an alternative for assessing the embodied energy and carbon of blended concrete in the building design stage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"488 - 502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02135-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02135-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02135-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016-2021年民用基础设施的发展增加了印度尼西亚的水泥和混凝土消费量。通过提供环境友好型水泥和混凝土替代品,并辅以具体能源和碳评估参考,可以加速减少全球变暖效应。在这项研究中,我们调查了印尼水泥从摇篮到大门的边界和预拌混凝土从摇篮到现场的边界的当地隐含能源和碳排放。生产过程数据收集自水泥制造商和预拌混凝土公司。分析从普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)和非OPC水泥开始,继续到轻量化OPC混凝土和正常重量的混合混凝土。对所含能量和碳进行了量化。结果表明:OPC水泥的强度最高,非OPC水泥其次为波特兰灰岩水泥(PPC)、波特兰水泥复合材料(PCC)和砌体水泥。现有的低能耗低碳混凝土混合料是高范围减水剂外加剂、补充胶凝材料(SCM)和水泥的组合。轻质OPC混凝土的隐含能量与参考OPC混凝土相当,但隐含碳比参考OPC混凝土低11.1%。与参考OPC混凝土相比,具有最佳SCM水平的正常重量混合PCC混凝土分别减少了53.8%和58.2%的隐含能量和碳。参考PPC混凝土被认为是在建筑设计阶段评估混合混凝土的隐含能量和碳的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of life cycle inventory of cement and ready-mix concrete production in Indonesia

The development of civil infrastructure in 2016–2021 increased cement and concrete consumption across Indonesia. The reduction of global warming effects can be expedited by providing environmentally friendly cement and concrete alternatives complemented with embodied energy and carbon assessment references. In this study, we investigated the local embodied energy and carbon emission with a boundary of cradle-to-gate for cements and that of cradle-to-site for ready-mix concretes in Indonesia. The production process data were collected from cement manufacturers and ready-mix concrete companies. The analysis starts with the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and non-OPC cement, and continues to the lightweight OPC concrete and the normal-weight blended concrete. The embodied energy and carbon were quantified. The results showed that those of OPC were the highest, followed by the non-OPC cement of Portland pozzolan cement (PPC), the Portland cement composite (PCC), and the masonry cement. The available low-energy and carbon concrete mixes were found to be a combination of a high-range water reducer admixture, a supplementary cementitious material (SCM), and cement. The lightweight OPC concrete had similar embodied energy with the reference OPC concrete, but its embodied carbon was up to 11.1% lower than the reference OPC. The normal-weight blended PCC concrete with optimum SCM levels reduced embodied energy and carbon by 53.8% and 58.2%, respectively, compared to the reference OPC concrete. The reference PPC concrete is considered an alternative for assessing the embodied energy and carbon of blended concrete in the building design stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信