{"title":"将怀孕期间使用阿片类药物定为犯罪:对所有妇女获得适当成瘾治疗的影响","authors":"Catalina Posada","doi":"10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Garnering much attention and public health concern, the opioid epidemic has generated severe health consequences across the United States. Of particular interest, opioid use during pregnancy has been criminalized by state-level and national policies to quell the rising rates of maternal addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome. However, recent research, has found that punitive policies (PPs) may instead exacerbate addiction by disincentivizing treatment-seeking behavior in pregnant women. Using treatment facility admissions data from 2013–2020, this study applies difference-in-difference methodology to extend previous studies’ exploration of the effects that PPs have on rates of pregnant admissions. Moreover, this study discerns the effect that PPs have on the prevalence of medication-assisted treatment for women of childbearing age. The impacts of PPs were modeled within a variety of policy landscapes, accounting for potential policy and resource interactions. With support from supplemental event study models, findings suggest that 1) PPs reduce the use of medication-assisted treatment in all policy landscapes and 2) when in isolation, PPs stifle rates of pregnant admissions. When active in states with more complex policy landscapes (i.e. not just in isolation), PPs were found to have more complicated effects on pregnant admissions, dynamics which merit future exploration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"52 4","pages":"229 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminalizing Opioid Use during Pregnancy: Impacts on All Women’s Access to Adequate Addiction Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Catalina Posada\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Garnering much attention and public health concern, the opioid epidemic has generated severe health consequences across the United States. Of particular interest, opioid use during pregnancy has been criminalized by state-level and national policies to quell the rising rates of maternal addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome. However, recent research, has found that punitive policies (PPs) may instead exacerbate addiction by disincentivizing treatment-seeking behavior in pregnant women. Using treatment facility admissions data from 2013–2020, this study applies difference-in-difference methodology to extend previous studies’ exploration of the effects that PPs have on rates of pregnant admissions. Moreover, this study discerns the effect that PPs have on the prevalence of medication-assisted treatment for women of childbearing age. The impacts of PPs were modeled within a variety of policy landscapes, accounting for potential policy and resource interactions. With support from supplemental event study models, findings suggest that 1) PPs reduce the use of medication-assisted treatment in all policy landscapes and 2) when in isolation, PPs stifle rates of pregnant admissions. When active in states with more complex policy landscapes (i.e. not just in isolation), PPs were found to have more complicated effects on pregnant admissions, dynamics which merit future exploration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"229 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Criminalizing Opioid Use during Pregnancy: Impacts on All Women’s Access to Adequate Addiction Treatment
Garnering much attention and public health concern, the opioid epidemic has generated severe health consequences across the United States. Of particular interest, opioid use during pregnancy has been criminalized by state-level and national policies to quell the rising rates of maternal addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome. However, recent research, has found that punitive policies (PPs) may instead exacerbate addiction by disincentivizing treatment-seeking behavior in pregnant women. Using treatment facility admissions data from 2013–2020, this study applies difference-in-difference methodology to extend previous studies’ exploration of the effects that PPs have on rates of pregnant admissions. Moreover, this study discerns the effect that PPs have on the prevalence of medication-assisted treatment for women of childbearing age. The impacts of PPs were modeled within a variety of policy landscapes, accounting for potential policy and resource interactions. With support from supplemental event study models, findings suggest that 1) PPs reduce the use of medication-assisted treatment in all policy landscapes and 2) when in isolation, PPs stifle rates of pregnant admissions. When active in states with more complex policy landscapes (i.e. not just in isolation), PPs were found to have more complicated effects on pregnant admissions, dynamics which merit future exploration.
期刊介绍:
The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J