将怀孕期间使用阿片类药物定为犯罪:对所有妇女获得适当成瘾治疗的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Catalina Posada
{"title":"将怀孕期间使用阿片类药物定为犯罪:对所有妇女获得适当成瘾治疗的影响","authors":"Catalina Posada","doi":"10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Garnering much attention and public health concern, the opioid epidemic has generated severe health consequences across the United States. Of particular interest, opioid use during pregnancy has been criminalized by state-level and national policies to quell the rising rates of maternal addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome. However, recent research, has found that punitive policies (PPs) may instead exacerbate addiction by disincentivizing treatment-seeking behavior in pregnant women. Using treatment facility admissions data from 2013–2020, this study applies difference-in-difference methodology to extend previous studies’ exploration of the effects that PPs have on rates of pregnant admissions. Moreover, this study discerns the effect that PPs have on the prevalence of medication-assisted treatment for women of childbearing age. The impacts of PPs were modeled within a variety of policy landscapes, accounting for potential policy and resource interactions. With support from supplemental event study models, findings suggest that 1) PPs reduce the use of medication-assisted treatment in all policy landscapes and 2) when in isolation, PPs stifle rates of pregnant admissions. When active in states with more complex policy landscapes (i.e. not just in isolation), PPs were found to have more complicated effects on pregnant admissions, dynamics which merit future exploration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"52 4","pages":"229 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminalizing Opioid Use during Pregnancy: Impacts on All Women’s Access to Adequate Addiction Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Catalina Posada\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Garnering much attention and public health concern, the opioid epidemic has generated severe health consequences across the United States. Of particular interest, opioid use during pregnancy has been criminalized by state-level and national policies to quell the rising rates of maternal addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome. However, recent research, has found that punitive policies (PPs) may instead exacerbate addiction by disincentivizing treatment-seeking behavior in pregnant women. Using treatment facility admissions data from 2013–2020, this study applies difference-in-difference methodology to extend previous studies’ exploration of the effects that PPs have on rates of pregnant admissions. Moreover, this study discerns the effect that PPs have on the prevalence of medication-assisted treatment for women of childbearing age. The impacts of PPs were modeled within a variety of policy landscapes, accounting for potential policy and resource interactions. With support from supplemental event study models, findings suggest that 1) PPs reduce the use of medication-assisted treatment in all policy landscapes and 2) when in isolation, PPs stifle rates of pregnant admissions. When active in states with more complex policy landscapes (i.e. not just in isolation), PPs were found to have more complicated effects on pregnant admissions, dynamics which merit future exploration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"229 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-024-09809-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物的流行引起了公众的广泛关注和关注,在美国各地造成了严重的健康后果。特别有趣的是,州级和国家政策已将怀孕期间使用阿片类药物定为犯罪,以抑制孕产妇成瘾和新生儿戒断综合征的上升率。然而,最近的研究发现,惩罚性政策(PPs)可能会通过抑制孕妇寻求治疗的行为而加剧成瘾。利用2013-2020年的治疗机构入院数据,本研究采用差异中的差异方法来扩展先前研究对PPs对孕妇入院率影响的探索。此外,本研究还发现了PPs对育龄妇女药物辅助治疗流行率的影响。在各种政策景观中模拟了PPs的影响,考虑了潜在的政策和资源相互作用。在补充事件研究模型的支持下,研究结果表明:1)PPs减少了所有政策景观中药物辅助治疗的使用;2)在孤立的情况下,PPs抑制了孕妇入院率。当在政策环境更复杂的州(即不仅仅是孤立的)开展活动时,PPs被发现对孕妇入院有更复杂的影响,这种动态值得未来探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Criminalizing Opioid Use during Pregnancy: Impacts on All Women’s Access to Adequate Addiction Treatment

Criminalizing Opioid Use during Pregnancy: Impacts on All Women’s Access to Adequate Addiction Treatment

Garnering much attention and public health concern, the opioid epidemic has generated severe health consequences across the United States. Of particular interest, opioid use during pregnancy has been criminalized by state-level and national policies to quell the rising rates of maternal addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome. However, recent research, has found that punitive policies (PPs) may instead exacerbate addiction by disincentivizing treatment-seeking behavior in pregnant women. Using treatment facility admissions data from 2013–2020, this study applies difference-in-difference methodology to extend previous studies’ exploration of the effects that PPs have on rates of pregnant admissions. Moreover, this study discerns the effect that PPs have on the prevalence of medication-assisted treatment for women of childbearing age. The impacts of PPs were modeled within a variety of policy landscapes, accounting for potential policy and resource interactions. With support from supplemental event study models, findings suggest that 1) PPs reduce the use of medication-assisted treatment in all policy landscapes and 2) when in isolation, PPs stifle rates of pregnant admissions. When active in states with more complex policy landscapes (i.e. not just in isolation), PPs were found to have more complicated effects on pregnant admissions, dynamics which merit future exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信