肿瘤外科患者围手术期心理健康干预:叙事综合与荟萃分析

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1111/anae.16471
Joanna Abraham, Katherine J. Holzer, Lavanya Pedamallu, Benjamin D. Kozower, Michael S. Avidan, Eric J. Lenze
{"title":"肿瘤外科患者围手术期心理健康干预:叙事综合与荟萃分析","authors":"Joanna Abraham,&nbsp;Katherine J. Holzer,&nbsp;Lavanya Pedamallu,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Kozower,&nbsp;Michael S. Avidan,&nbsp;Eric J. Lenze","doi":"10.1111/anae.16471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Oncologic surgeries are common and rates of depression and anxiety are high in the peri-operative period, potentially interfering with successful recovery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a narrative review and meta-analysis focusing on randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of peri-operative mental health interventions on anxiety and/or depression in adult patients having oncological surgery. The review included studies published in the last 5 years, identified through EMBASE with no pre-specified criteria for the type of comparison or outcome. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for outcomes with sufficient data, and a vote-counting synthesis was performed for studies with insufficient data or fewer than two studies per outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen randomised controlled trials were included. All were conducted internationally, primarily in Asia. Ten studies assessed psychological interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy), six assessed pharmacological interventions (e.g. ketamine) and one assessed acupuncture. Meta-analysis revealed significant intervention effects on pre-operative anxiety scores (n = 429, Hedge's g = -1.03, p = 0.001) and postoperative depression scores at hospital discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -0.88, p &lt; 0.001), whereas no significant intervention effect was found in anxiety scores at discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -1.54, p = 0.08). Vote-counting synthesis identified intervention effects on depression and anxiety scores on day 3 postoperatively and on depression scores at one-week postoperatively, while all other time-points showed no intervention effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Psychological and pharmacological interventions are effective at reducing pre-operative anxiety and immediate postoperative depression scores in patients having oncological surgery, but these benefits do not persist postoperatively. Hence, future research efforts should focus on development and testing of interventions that are effective and implementable within the peri-operative context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 S2","pages":"54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16471","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri-operative mental health interventions for surgical oncology patients: a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Abraham,&nbsp;Katherine J. Holzer,&nbsp;Lavanya Pedamallu,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Kozower,&nbsp;Michael S. Avidan,&nbsp;Eric J. Lenze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Oncologic surgeries are common and rates of depression and anxiety are high in the peri-operative period, potentially interfering with successful recovery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a narrative review and meta-analysis focusing on randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of peri-operative mental health interventions on anxiety and/or depression in adult patients having oncological surgery. The review included studies published in the last 5 years, identified through EMBASE with no pre-specified criteria for the type of comparison or outcome. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for outcomes with sufficient data, and a vote-counting synthesis was performed for studies with insufficient data or fewer than two studies per outcome.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventeen randomised controlled trials were included. All were conducted internationally, primarily in Asia. Ten studies assessed psychological interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy), six assessed pharmacological interventions (e.g. ketamine) and one assessed acupuncture. Meta-analysis revealed significant intervention effects on pre-operative anxiety scores (n = 429, Hedge's g = -1.03, p = 0.001) and postoperative depression scores at hospital discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -0.88, p &lt; 0.001), whereas no significant intervention effect was found in anxiety scores at discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -1.54, p = 0.08). Vote-counting synthesis identified intervention effects on depression and anxiety scores on day 3 postoperatively and on depression scores at one-week postoperatively, while all other time-points showed no intervention effect.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Psychological and pharmacological interventions are effective at reducing pre-operative anxiety and immediate postoperative depression scores in patients having oncological surgery, but these benefits do not persist postoperatively. Hence, future research efforts should focus on development and testing of interventions that are effective and implementable within the peri-operative context.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"80 S2\",\"pages\":\"54-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16471\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16471\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤手术很常见,围手术期抑郁和焦虑的发生率很高,可能会干扰成功的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peri-operative mental health interventions for surgical oncology patients: a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis

Introduction

Oncologic surgeries are common and rates of depression and anxiety are high in the peri-operative period, potentially interfering with successful recovery.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review and meta-analysis focusing on randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of peri-operative mental health interventions on anxiety and/or depression in adult patients having oncological surgery. The review included studies published in the last 5 years, identified through EMBASE with no pre-specified criteria for the type of comparison or outcome. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for outcomes with sufficient data, and a vote-counting synthesis was performed for studies with insufficient data or fewer than two studies per outcome.

Results

Seventeen randomised controlled trials were included. All were conducted internationally, primarily in Asia. Ten studies assessed psychological interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy), six assessed pharmacological interventions (e.g. ketamine) and one assessed acupuncture. Meta-analysis revealed significant intervention effects on pre-operative anxiety scores (n = 429, Hedge's g = -1.03, p = 0.001) and postoperative depression scores at hospital discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -0.88, p < 0.001), whereas no significant intervention effect was found in anxiety scores at discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -1.54, p = 0.08). Vote-counting synthesis identified intervention effects on depression and anxiety scores on day 3 postoperatively and on depression scores at one-week postoperatively, while all other time-points showed no intervention effect.

Discussion

Psychological and pharmacological interventions are effective at reducing pre-operative anxiety and immediate postoperative depression scores in patients having oncological surgery, but these benefits do not persist postoperatively. Hence, future research efforts should focus on development and testing of interventions that are effective and implementable within the peri-operative context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信