农村卫生专业人员的福祉干预:范围审查。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Skye McKennon PharmD, BCPS, ACSM-GEI, Suzanne Fricke DVM, MLIS, Dawn DeWitt MDMSc, CMedEd, MACP, FRACP, FRCP-London
{"title":"农村卫生专业人员的福祉干预:范围审查。","authors":"Skye McKennon PharmD, BCPS, ACSM-GEI,&nbsp;Suzanne Fricke DVM, MLIS,&nbsp;Dawn DeWitt MDMSc, CMedEd, MACP, FRACP, FRCP-London","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this scoping review is to identify interventions to promote well-being that have been tried or proven effective to prevent or address burnout in rural health care professionals and trainees (HCPTs). Secondarily, we aimed to identify potentially applicable and feasible well-being interventions that could help rural HCPTs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and analysis</h3>\n \n <p>We used PRISMA guidelines to conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed English language studies, from all countries, published in core health sciences databases. We focused on intervention studies for burnout and well-being in rural HCPTs published from July 2013 to January 2024. Searches identified 571 studies; 18 additional studies were identified from hand searches of websites, reviews, and bibliographies identified in the original search strategy. Two authors screened and extracted all data using Covidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>After deduplication, 507 studies were screened for inclusion, and 50 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. After discussion and consensus, 30 studies were selected for inclusion. We included selected “applicable” studies, for example, online interventions. We excluded potentially applicable studies that would not be feasible in rural settings, that is, health system interventions requiring substantial personnel and infrastructure. Interventions included individual interventions (eg, mindfulness), increased support for professionals (eg, remote pharmacist assistance), and interventions to improve quality or teamwork.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Few interventional studies have been done to support well-being and prevent burnout in vulnerable rural HCPTs. While individual interventions, such as mindfulness, are most effective to date, studies replicating or extending these interventions, and to identify supports that address workload and systems issues are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well-being interventions for rural health professionals: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Skye McKennon PharmD, BCPS, ACSM-GEI,&nbsp;Suzanne Fricke DVM, MLIS,&nbsp;Dawn DeWitt MDMSc, CMedEd, MACP, FRACP, FRCP-London\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this scoping review is to identify interventions to promote well-being that have been tried or proven effective to prevent or address burnout in rural health care professionals and trainees (HCPTs). Secondarily, we aimed to identify potentially applicable and feasible well-being interventions that could help rural HCPTs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and analysis</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used PRISMA guidelines to conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed English language studies, from all countries, published in core health sciences databases. We focused on intervention studies for burnout and well-being in rural HCPTs published from July 2013 to January 2024. Searches identified 571 studies; 18 additional studies were identified from hand searches of websites, reviews, and bibliographies identified in the original search strategy. Two authors screened and extracted all data using Covidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>After deduplication, 507 studies were screened for inclusion, and 50 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. After discussion and consensus, 30 studies were selected for inclusion. We included selected “applicable” studies, for example, online interventions. We excluded potentially applicable studies that would not be feasible in rural settings, that is, health system interventions requiring substantial personnel and infrastructure. Interventions included individual interventions (eg, mindfulness), increased support for professionals (eg, remote pharmacist assistance), and interventions to improve quality or teamwork.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Few interventional studies have been done to support well-being and prevent burnout in vulnerable rural HCPTs. While individual interventions, such as mindfulness, are most effective to date, studies replicating or extending these interventions, and to identify supports that address workload and systems issues are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701247/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12909\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本范围审查的目的是确定已被尝试或证明有效预防或解决农村卫生保健专业人员和受训人员(HCPTs)倦怠的促进福祉的干预措施。其次,我们的目标是确定可能适用和可行的福祉干预措施,可以帮助农村HCPTs。方法和分析:我们使用PRISMA指南对发表在核心健康科学数据库中的来自所有国家的同行评议的英语研究进行了范围审查。我们关注2013年7月至2024年1月发表的农村HCPTs的倦怠和幸福感干预研究。搜索确定了571项研究;从原始搜索策略中确定的网站、评论和参考书目中手工搜索确定了另外18项研究。两位作者使用covid - ence筛选和提取了所有数据。结果:在重复数据删除后,507项研究被筛选纳入,50项全文研究被评估为合格。经过讨论和共识,我们选择了30项研究纳入。我们选择了“适用”的研究,例如在线干预。我们排除了在农村环境中不可行的潜在适用研究,即需要大量人员和基础设施的卫生系统干预措施。干预措施包括个人干预(例如,正念),增加对专业人员的支持(例如,远程药剂师协助),以及提高质量或团队合作的干预措施。结论:很少有干预研究支持农村弱势HCPTs的福祉和预防倦怠。虽然个人干预措施,如正念,是迄今为止最有效的,但需要研究复制或扩展这些干预措施,并确定解决工作量和系统问题的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Well-being interventions for rural health professionals: A scoping review

Well-being interventions for rural health professionals: A scoping review

Introduction

The objective of this scoping review is to identify interventions to promote well-being that have been tried or proven effective to prevent or address burnout in rural health care professionals and trainees (HCPTs). Secondarily, we aimed to identify potentially applicable and feasible well-being interventions that could help rural HCPTs.

Methods and analysis

We used PRISMA guidelines to conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed English language studies, from all countries, published in core health sciences databases. We focused on intervention studies for burnout and well-being in rural HCPTs published from July 2013 to January 2024. Searches identified 571 studies; 18 additional studies were identified from hand searches of websites, reviews, and bibliographies identified in the original search strategy. Two authors screened and extracted all data using Covidence.

Findings

After deduplication, 507 studies were screened for inclusion, and 50 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. After discussion and consensus, 30 studies were selected for inclusion. We included selected “applicable” studies, for example, online interventions. We excluded potentially applicable studies that would not be feasible in rural settings, that is, health system interventions requiring substantial personnel and infrastructure. Interventions included individual interventions (eg, mindfulness), increased support for professionals (eg, remote pharmacist assistance), and interventions to improve quality or teamwork.

Conclusions

Few interventional studies have been done to support well-being and prevent burnout in vulnerable rural HCPTs. While individual interventions, such as mindfulness, are most effective to date, studies replicating or extending these interventions, and to identify supports that address workload and systems issues are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信