IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Qian Liu, Jianhua Ren, Wenhui Zhang, Tangzhao Liang, Zhe Wang, Siwei Xie, Yuhang Li, Jianfeng Hou, Kun Wang, Ronghan He
{"title":"Measured Resection as Gap Balance Method in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Qian Liu, Jianhua Ren, Wenhui Zhang, Tangzhao Liang, Zhe Wang, Siwei Xie, Yuhang Li, Jianfeng Hou, Kun Wang, Ronghan He","doi":"10.1111/os.14346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gap balancing is a vital process during mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA). However, this process commonly depends on the surgeon's experience and lacks specific unified standards. This study aimed to propose and evaluate a novel \"measured resection\" method for gap balance in MB-UKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 49 consecutive patients (52 knees) who underwent MB-UKA from February 1, 2023, to September 1, 2023. Gap balance was achieved by the traditional \"two-finger\" method (Group 1, 26 knees) or the measured resection method (Group 2, 26 knees). The novel \"measured resection\" method was performed by measuring the thickness of the resected posterior femoral condyle and resected medial posterior tibial plateau to assess proper meniscal bearing thickness. Data were collected at baseline and the 6-month follow-up. Prosthetic angles, range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and Global Perceived Scale (GPE) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant improvements in all measured outcomes at the 6-month follow-up from baseline in both groups (p < 0.01). Patients using measured resection method showed better ROM (130° vs. 120°, p = 0.007), VAS score (1 vs. 2, p = 0.013), and OKS scores (39.9 vs. 38.1, p = 0.013) at 6-month follow-up than the traditional \"two-finger\" method group. The prosthetic angles, ROM improvement, and GPE showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The measured resection method is a reliable method for assisting surgeons in choosing the ideal meniscal bearing thickness in MB-UKA to achieve proper gap balance and gain better clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03815448).</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:间隙平衡是活动承载单间室膝关节置换术(MB-UKA)中的一个重要过程。然而,这一过程通常取决于外科医生的经验,缺乏具体的统一标准。本研究旨在提出并评估一种用于 MB-UKA 间隙平衡的新型 "测量切除 "方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2023 年 2 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 1 日期间接受 MB-UKA 手术的 49 例连续患者(52 个膝关节)。采用传统的 "双指 "法(第 1 组,26 个膝关节)或测量切除法(第 2 组,26 个膝关节)实现间隙平衡。新颖的 "测量切除 "法是通过测量切除的股骨后髁和切除的胫骨内侧后平台的厚度来评估半月板的适当承托厚度。在基线和 6 个月的随访中收集了数据。假体角度、活动范围(ROM)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)和全球感知量表(GPE)用于评估临床结果。采用独立样本 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较差异:结果:两组患者在随访 6 个月时,所有测量结果均较基线有明显改善(P 0.05):结论:测量切除法是一种可靠的方法,可帮助外科医生在MB-UKA手术中选择理想的半月板承托厚度,以达到适当的间隙平衡,获得更好的临床效果:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03815448)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measured Resection as Gap Balance Method in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Gap balancing is a vital process during mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA). However, this process commonly depends on the surgeon's experience and lacks specific unified standards. This study aimed to propose and evaluate a novel "measured resection" method for gap balance in MB-UKA.

Methods: This prospective study included 49 consecutive patients (52 knees) who underwent MB-UKA from February 1, 2023, to September 1, 2023. Gap balance was achieved by the traditional "two-finger" method (Group 1, 26 knees) or the measured resection method (Group 2, 26 knees). The novel "measured resection" method was performed by measuring the thickness of the resected posterior femoral condyle and resected medial posterior tibial plateau to assess proper meniscal bearing thickness. Data were collected at baseline and the 6-month follow-up. Prosthetic angles, range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and Global Perceived Scale (GPE) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences.

Results: There were significant improvements in all measured outcomes at the 6-month follow-up from baseline in both groups (p < 0.01). Patients using measured resection method showed better ROM (130° vs. 120°, p = 0.007), VAS score (1 vs. 2, p = 0.013), and OKS scores (39.9 vs. 38.1, p = 0.013) at 6-month follow-up than the traditional "two-finger" method group. The prosthetic angles, ROM improvement, and GPE showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The measured resection method is a reliable method for assisting surgeons in choosing the ideal meniscal bearing thickness in MB-UKA to achieve proper gap balance and gain better clinical outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03815448).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信