经皮介入治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的性别差异。

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Selma T Cook, Laure Allemann, Malica Cook, Diego A Arroyo, Thais Pittet, Pascal Meier, Mario Togni, Amel Brahim-Mathiron, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook
{"title":"经皮介入治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的性别差异。","authors":"Selma T Cook, Laure Allemann, Malica Cook, Diego A Arroyo, Thais Pittet, Pascal Meier, Mario Togni, Amel Brahim-Mathiron, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of sex on coronary artery disease prognosis is debated. It has been postulated that women receive less prompt treatment compared with men, potentially adversely affecting their prognosis by significantly increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the influence of sex on the timing and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using a controlled Swiss registry.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Based on the Fribourg STEMI Fast Track Registry, 1177 patients (288 women, 889 men) with >12 months clinical follow-up were selected. Women had longer first medical contact to reperfusion times (1.31 (1.14-2.00) vs 1.27 (1.09-1.54) hours, p=0.035) but similar total ischaemic times (3.04 (2.15-4.50) vs 2.56 (2.07-4.38) hours, p=0.064). Men had higher rates of diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia, while women had higher hypertension and renal insufficiency rates. No significant sex differences in clinical outcomes were observed at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study found sex differences in patient profiles and minor treatment delays for women, which did not significantly affect outcomes. Efforts to improve sex equity in STEMI care are effective, as no significant outcome differences were observed. Disparities are more related to patient characteristics than sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite slight delays and different risk profiles for women with STEMI, clinical outcomes are similar between sexes. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure sex equity in acute coronary syndrome management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04185285.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Selma T Cook, Laure Allemann, Malica Cook, Diego A Arroyo, Thais Pittet, Pascal Meier, Mario Togni, Amel Brahim-Mathiron, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of sex on coronary artery disease prognosis is debated. It has been postulated that women receive less prompt treatment compared with men, potentially adversely affecting their prognosis by significantly increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the influence of sex on the timing and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using a controlled Swiss registry.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Based on the Fribourg STEMI Fast Track Registry, 1177 patients (288 women, 889 men) with >12 months clinical follow-up were selected. Women had longer first medical contact to reperfusion times (1.31 (1.14-2.00) vs 1.27 (1.09-1.54) hours, p=0.035) but similar total ischaemic times (3.04 (2.15-4.50) vs 2.56 (2.07-4.38) hours, p=0.064). Men had higher rates of diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia, while women had higher hypertension and renal insufficiency rates. No significant sex differences in clinical outcomes were observed at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study found sex differences in patient profiles and minor treatment delays for women, which did not significantly affect outcomes. Efforts to improve sex equity in STEMI care are effective, as no significant outcome differences were observed. Disparities are more related to patient characteristics than sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite slight delays and different risk profiles for women with STEMI, clinical outcomes are similar between sexes. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure sex equity in acute coronary syndrome management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04185285.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别对冠状动脉疾病预后的影响一直存在争议。据推测,与男性相比,女性得到的治疗较不及时,这可能会显著增加发病率和死亡率的风险,从而对她们的预后产生不利影响。我们的目的是研究性别对st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者时间和临床结果的影响。方法和结果:基于弗里堡STEMI快速通道注册表,选择1177例患者(288名女性,889名男性)进行12个月的临床随访。女性第一次医疗接触到再灌注时间更长(1.31(1.14-2.00)比1.27(1.09-1.54)小时,p=0.035),但总缺血时间相似(3.04(2.15-4.50)比2.56(2.07-4.38)小时,p=0.064)。男性患糖尿病、吸烟和血脂异常的比例更高,而女性患高血压和肾功能不全的比例更高。在1年和5年的随访中,临床结果没有明显的性别差异。讨论:研究发现女性患者的性别差异和轻微的治疗延迟对结果没有显著影响。在STEMI护理中改善性别平等的努力是有效的,因为没有观察到显著的结果差异。差异与患者特征的关系大于与性别的关系。结论:尽管STEMI女性患者有轻微的延迟和不同的风险特征,但临床结果在性别之间是相似的。需要持续努力确保急性冠脉综合征管理中的性别平等。试验注册号:NCT04185285。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention.

Introduction: The impact of sex on coronary artery disease prognosis is debated. It has been postulated that women receive less prompt treatment compared with men, potentially adversely affecting their prognosis by significantly increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the influence of sex on the timing and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using a controlled Swiss registry.

Methods and results: Based on the Fribourg STEMI Fast Track Registry, 1177 patients (288 women, 889 men) with >12 months clinical follow-up were selected. Women had longer first medical contact to reperfusion times (1.31 (1.14-2.00) vs 1.27 (1.09-1.54) hours, p=0.035) but similar total ischaemic times (3.04 (2.15-4.50) vs 2.56 (2.07-4.38) hours, p=0.064). Men had higher rates of diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia, while women had higher hypertension and renal insufficiency rates. No significant sex differences in clinical outcomes were observed at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups.

Discussion: The study found sex differences in patient profiles and minor treatment delays for women, which did not significantly affect outcomes. Efforts to improve sex equity in STEMI care are effective, as no significant outcome differences were observed. Disparities are more related to patient characteristics than sex.

Conclusion: Despite slight delays and different risk profiles for women with STEMI, clinical outcomes are similar between sexes. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure sex equity in acute coronary syndrome management.

Trial registration number: NCT04185285.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信