Selma T Cook, Laure Allemann, Malica Cook, Diego A Arroyo, Thais Pittet, Pascal Meier, Mario Togni, Amel Brahim-Mathiron, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook
{"title":"经皮介入治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的性别差异。","authors":"Selma T Cook, Laure Allemann, Malica Cook, Diego A Arroyo, Thais Pittet, Pascal Meier, Mario Togni, Amel Brahim-Mathiron, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of sex on coronary artery disease prognosis is debated. It has been postulated that women receive less prompt treatment compared with men, potentially adversely affecting their prognosis by significantly increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the influence of sex on the timing and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using a controlled Swiss registry.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Based on the Fribourg STEMI Fast Track Registry, 1177 patients (288 women, 889 men) with >12 months clinical follow-up were selected. Women had longer first medical contact to reperfusion times (1.31 (1.14-2.00) vs 1.27 (1.09-1.54) hours, p=0.035) but similar total ischaemic times (3.04 (2.15-4.50) vs 2.56 (2.07-4.38) hours, p=0.064). Men had higher rates of diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia, while women had higher hypertension and renal insufficiency rates. No significant sex differences in clinical outcomes were observed at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study found sex differences in patient profiles and minor treatment delays for women, which did not significantly affect outcomes. Efforts to improve sex equity in STEMI care are effective, as no significant outcome differences were observed. Disparities are more related to patient characteristics than sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite slight delays and different risk profiles for women with STEMI, clinical outcomes are similar between sexes. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure sex equity in acute coronary syndrome management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04185285.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Selma T Cook, Laure Allemann, Malica Cook, Diego A Arroyo, Thais Pittet, Pascal Meier, Mario Togni, Amel Brahim-Mathiron, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of sex on coronary artery disease prognosis is debated. It has been postulated that women receive less prompt treatment compared with men, potentially adversely affecting their prognosis by significantly increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the influence of sex on the timing and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using a controlled Swiss registry.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Based on the Fribourg STEMI Fast Track Registry, 1177 patients (288 women, 889 men) with >12 months clinical follow-up were selected. Women had longer first medical contact to reperfusion times (1.31 (1.14-2.00) vs 1.27 (1.09-1.54) hours, p=0.035) but similar total ischaemic times (3.04 (2.15-4.50) vs 2.56 (2.07-4.38) hours, p=0.064). Men had higher rates of diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia, while women had higher hypertension and renal insufficiency rates. No significant sex differences in clinical outcomes were observed at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study found sex differences in patient profiles and minor treatment delays for women, which did not significantly affect outcomes. Efforts to improve sex equity in STEMI care are effective, as no significant outcome differences were observed. Disparities are more related to patient characteristics than sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite slight delays and different risk profiles for women with STEMI, clinical outcomes are similar between sexes. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure sex equity in acute coronary syndrome management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04185285.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sex differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention.
Introduction: The impact of sex on coronary artery disease prognosis is debated. It has been postulated that women receive less prompt treatment compared with men, potentially adversely affecting their prognosis by significantly increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the influence of sex on the timing and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using a controlled Swiss registry.
Methods and results: Based on the Fribourg STEMI Fast Track Registry, 1177 patients (288 women, 889 men) with >12 months clinical follow-up were selected. Women had longer first medical contact to reperfusion times (1.31 (1.14-2.00) vs 1.27 (1.09-1.54) hours, p=0.035) but similar total ischaemic times (3.04 (2.15-4.50) vs 2.56 (2.07-4.38) hours, p=0.064). Men had higher rates of diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia, while women had higher hypertension and renal insufficiency rates. No significant sex differences in clinical outcomes were observed at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups.
Discussion: The study found sex differences in patient profiles and minor treatment delays for women, which did not significantly affect outcomes. Efforts to improve sex equity in STEMI care are effective, as no significant outcome differences were observed. Disparities are more related to patient characteristics than sex.
Conclusion: Despite slight delays and different risk profiles for women with STEMI, clinical outcomes are similar between sexes. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure sex equity in acute coronary syndrome management.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.