Youngkyung Jung, Karim Mithani, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras Warsi, Irene E Harmsen, Sara Breitbart, Carolina Gorodetsky, Alfonso Fasano, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, Alexander Weil, George Ibrahim
{"title":"脑深部刺激在儿科人群:临床试验前景的范围审查。","authors":"Youngkyung Jung, Karim Mithani, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras Warsi, Irene E Harmsen, Sara Breitbart, Carolina Gorodetsky, Alfonso Fasano, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, Alexander Weil, George Ibrahim","doi":"10.1159/000543289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There has been rapid advancement in the development of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment option for adults for neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we present a scoping review of completed and ongoing clinical trials focused on DBS in pediatric populations, highlighting key knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, OVID, and Embase) and the clinicaltrials.gov registry were queried to identify clinical trials for DBS in pediatric cohorts (age < 18). Prospective and retrospective case series were excluded. No restrictions were placed on the diagnoses or measured clinical outcomes. Individual patient demographics, diagnosis, DBS target, and primary endpoints were extracted and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 clinical trials were included in the final review, consisting of 9 completed trials (357 screened) and 4 ongoing trials (82 screened). Of the completed trials, 6 studied dystonia (both inherited and acquired; participants aged 4-18), and 3 studied drug-resistant epilepsy (participants aged 4-17). Amongst the 6 trials for dystonia, 5 used the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as the primary endpoint. There were a total of 18 adverse events documented across 63 participants, with 5 of 9 studies reporting adverse events. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating DBS for dystonia (N=2), epilepsy (N=1), and self-injurious behaviour (N=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review summarizes the landscape of clinical trials for DBS in children and youth. In dystonia, further research is warranted with more relevant pediatric outcome measures and for understudied patient subgroups and targets. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of evaluate the role of DBS in other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders in pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep brain stimulation in pediatric populations: A scoping review of the clinical trial landscape.\",\"authors\":\"Youngkyung Jung, Karim Mithani, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras Warsi, Irene E Harmsen, Sara Breitbart, Carolina Gorodetsky, Alfonso Fasano, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, Alexander Weil, George Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There has been rapid advancement in the development of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment option for adults for neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we present a scoping review of completed and ongoing clinical trials focused on DBS in pediatric populations, highlighting key knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, OVID, and Embase) and the clinicaltrials.gov registry were queried to identify clinical trials for DBS in pediatric cohorts (age < 18). Prospective and retrospective case series were excluded. No restrictions were placed on the diagnoses or measured clinical outcomes. Individual patient demographics, diagnosis, DBS target, and primary endpoints were extracted and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 clinical trials were included in the final review, consisting of 9 completed trials (357 screened) and 4 ongoing trials (82 screened). Of the completed trials, 6 studied dystonia (both inherited and acquired; participants aged 4-18), and 3 studied drug-resistant epilepsy (participants aged 4-17). Amongst the 6 trials for dystonia, 5 used the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as the primary endpoint. There were a total of 18 adverse events documented across 63 participants, with 5 of 9 studies reporting adverse events. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating DBS for dystonia (N=2), epilepsy (N=1), and self-injurious behaviour (N=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review summarizes the landscape of clinical trials for DBS in children and youth. In dystonia, further research is warranted with more relevant pediatric outcome measures and for understudied patient subgroups and targets. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of evaluate the role of DBS in other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders in pediatric populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep brain stimulation in pediatric populations: A scoping review of the clinical trial landscape.
Objective: There has been rapid advancement in the development of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment option for adults for neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we present a scoping review of completed and ongoing clinical trials focused on DBS in pediatric populations, highlighting key knowledge gaps.
Methods: Three databases (PubMed, OVID, and Embase) and the clinicaltrials.gov registry were queried to identify clinical trials for DBS in pediatric cohorts (age < 18). Prospective and retrospective case series were excluded. No restrictions were placed on the diagnoses or measured clinical outcomes. Individual patient demographics, diagnosis, DBS target, and primary endpoints were extracted and summarized.
Results: A total of 13 clinical trials were included in the final review, consisting of 9 completed trials (357 screened) and 4 ongoing trials (82 screened). Of the completed trials, 6 studied dystonia (both inherited and acquired; participants aged 4-18), and 3 studied drug-resistant epilepsy (participants aged 4-17). Amongst the 6 trials for dystonia, 5 used the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as the primary endpoint. There were a total of 18 adverse events documented across 63 participants, with 5 of 9 studies reporting adverse events. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating DBS for dystonia (N=2), epilepsy (N=1), and self-injurious behaviour (N=1).
Conclusions: This scoping review summarizes the landscape of clinical trials for DBS in children and youth. In dystonia, further research is warranted with more relevant pediatric outcome measures and for understudied patient subgroups and targets. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of evaluate the role of DBS in other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders in pediatric populations.
期刊介绍:
''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.