健康的社会决定因素在COVID-19康复中的作用:一项定性研究

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Neelima Navuluri, Nrupen A Bhavsar, Vivian Chen, Margaret Falkovic, Laura J Fish, Lauren Gray, Christina Makarushka, Laura Mkumba, Hnin Thuzar Lwin, Auston Stiefer, Deepshikha Charan Ashana
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素在COVID-19康复中的作用:一项定性研究","authors":"Neelima Navuluri, Nrupen A Bhavsar, Vivian Chen, Margaret Falkovic, Laura J Fish, Lauren Gray, Christina Makarushka, Laura Mkumba, Hnin Thuzar Lwin, Auston Stiefer, Deepshikha Charan Ashana","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Health systems are increasingly required to conduct health-related social needs screening. However, how social resources negatively and positively affect recovery from acute illnesses, such as COVID-19, is incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence recovery from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this qualitative study, patients were recruited for semistructured interviews from a post-COVID-19 pulmonary clinic at a southeastern US academic medical center between November 2022 and March 2023. Caregivers were included in dyadic interviews when available. Interviews queried participants about SDOH domains, as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and their relationship with COVID-19 recovery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Phenomenologic analysis identified themes characterizing participant perspectives on the influence of SDOH on COVID-19 recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 interviews were conducted: 10 (42%) with patient-caregiver dyads, 13 (54%) with patients alone, and 1 (4%) with 2 patients who also served as each other's caregiver. Most participants were female (18 patients [72%] and 6 caregivers [60%]). The median age of patients was 57 years (IQR, 44-61 years) and of caregivers was 47 years (IQR, 39-62 years). Three cross-cutting themes that overlapped SDOH domains were identified. Participants noted that innovative mobilization of social resources (eg, policies to secure income during time away from work) supported recovery from COVID-19 illness, but destabilization and change introduced by illness (eg, disrupted social support networks) and mistrust of previously established institutions (eg, public health misinformation) hindered recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Participants identified 3 distinct SDOH domains positively and negatively influencing recovery from COVID-19 illness. The findings suggest that longitudinal, multidomain data on SDOH are needed to best address barriers and identify resources for patients recovering from acute illness and may help determine opportunities for system- and policy-level interventions that can mitigate the influence of long-standing structural inequities on health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2453261"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Social Determinants of Health in COVID-19 Recovery: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Neelima Navuluri, Nrupen A Bhavsar, Vivian Chen, Margaret Falkovic, Laura J Fish, Lauren Gray, Christina Makarushka, Laura Mkumba, Hnin Thuzar Lwin, Auston Stiefer, Deepshikha Charan Ashana\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Health systems are increasingly required to conduct health-related social needs screening. However, how social resources negatively and positively affect recovery from acute illnesses, such as COVID-19, is incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence recovery from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this qualitative study, patients were recruited for semistructured interviews from a post-COVID-19 pulmonary clinic at a southeastern US academic medical center between November 2022 and March 2023. Caregivers were included in dyadic interviews when available. Interviews queried participants about SDOH domains, as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and their relationship with COVID-19 recovery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Phenomenologic analysis identified themes characterizing participant perspectives on the influence of SDOH on COVID-19 recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 interviews were conducted: 10 (42%) with patient-caregiver dyads, 13 (54%) with patients alone, and 1 (4%) with 2 patients who also served as each other's caregiver. Most participants were female (18 patients [72%] and 6 caregivers [60%]). The median age of patients was 57 years (IQR, 44-61 years) and of caregivers was 47 years (IQR, 39-62 years). Three cross-cutting themes that overlapped SDOH domains were identified. Participants noted that innovative mobilization of social resources (eg, policies to secure income during time away from work) supported recovery from COVID-19 illness, but destabilization and change introduced by illness (eg, disrupted social support networks) and mistrust of previously established institutions (eg, public health misinformation) hindered recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Participants identified 3 distinct SDOH domains positively and negatively influencing recovery from COVID-19 illness. The findings suggest that longitudinal, multidomain data on SDOH are needed to best address barriers and identify resources for patients recovering from acute illness and may help determine opportunities for system- and policy-level interventions that can mitigate the influence of long-standing structural inequities on health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e2453261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53261\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53261","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:越来越多地要求卫生系统开展与健康有关的社会需求筛查。然而,社会资源如何消极和积极地影响COVID-19等急性疾病的康复,尚不完全清楚。目的:探讨健康社会决定因素(SDOH)对COVID-19患者康复的影响。设计、环境和参与者:在这项定性研究中,在2022年11月至2023年3月期间,从美国东南部学术医疗中心的covid -19后肺部诊所招募了患者进行半结构化访谈。护理人员在可能的情况下被纳入二元访谈。采访询问了参与者关于美国疾病控制和预防中心定义的SDOH域及其与COVID-19恢复的关系。主要结果和措施:现象学分析确定了主题,表征了参与者对SDOH对COVID-19康复影响的看法。结果:共进行了24次访谈,其中10次(42%)为患者-照顾者二人组,13次(54%)为单独访谈,1次(4%)为两名患者同时担任对方的照顾者。大多数参与者为女性(18名患者[72%]和6名护理人员[60%])。患者年龄中位数为57岁(IQR, 44-61岁),护理人员年龄中位数为47岁(IQR, 39-62岁)。确定了重叠SDOH域的三个交叉主题。与会者指出,以创新方式调动社会资源(例如,在不工作期间确保收入的政策)有助于从COVID-19疾病中恢复过来,但疾病带来的不稳定和变化(例如,社会支持网络中断)以及对以前建立的机构的不信任(例如,公共卫生错误信息)阻碍了恢复。结论和相关性:参与者确定了3个不同的SDOH域对COVID-19疾病的康复有积极和消极的影响。研究结果表明,需要关于SDOH的纵向、多领域数据,以最好地解决障碍并确定从急性病中康复的患者的资源,并可能有助于确定系统和政策层面干预的机会,从而减轻长期存在的结构性不平等对健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Social Determinants of Health in COVID-19 Recovery: A Qualitative Study.

Importance: Health systems are increasingly required to conduct health-related social needs screening. However, how social resources negatively and positively affect recovery from acute illnesses, such as COVID-19, is incompletely understood.

Objective: To examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence recovery from COVID-19.

Design, setting, and participants: In this qualitative study, patients were recruited for semistructured interviews from a post-COVID-19 pulmonary clinic at a southeastern US academic medical center between November 2022 and March 2023. Caregivers were included in dyadic interviews when available. Interviews queried participants about SDOH domains, as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and their relationship with COVID-19 recovery.

Main outcome and measures: Phenomenologic analysis identified themes characterizing participant perspectives on the influence of SDOH on COVID-19 recovery.

Results: A total of 24 interviews were conducted: 10 (42%) with patient-caregiver dyads, 13 (54%) with patients alone, and 1 (4%) with 2 patients who also served as each other's caregiver. Most participants were female (18 patients [72%] and 6 caregivers [60%]). The median age of patients was 57 years (IQR, 44-61 years) and of caregivers was 47 years (IQR, 39-62 years). Three cross-cutting themes that overlapped SDOH domains were identified. Participants noted that innovative mobilization of social resources (eg, policies to secure income during time away from work) supported recovery from COVID-19 illness, but destabilization and change introduced by illness (eg, disrupted social support networks) and mistrust of previously established institutions (eg, public health misinformation) hindered recovery.

Conclusions and relevance: Participants identified 3 distinct SDOH domains positively and negatively influencing recovery from COVID-19 illness. The findings suggest that longitudinal, multidomain data on SDOH are needed to best address barriers and identify resources for patients recovering from acute illness and may help determine opportunities for system- and policy-level interventions that can mitigate the influence of long-standing structural inequities on health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信