Claudio A Rivas Palacios, Mario M Barbosa, María A Escobar, Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas, Camilo García, Salvador M Mattar, Salvador Mattar
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合与颈椎椎体切除术联合髂骨植骨融合治疗多节段退行性脊髓病:单中心经验。","authors":"Claudio A Rivas Palacios, Mario M Barbosa, María A Escobar, Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas, Camilo García, Salvador M Mattar, Salvador Mattar","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated and compared the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (CDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy with iliac crest graft and fusion (CCF) in patients with ≥3 level degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior and posterior approaches are widely employed in DCM when compressive elements predominate in the anterior or posterior spinal cord, respectively. Indications for each approach remain controversial in some contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the STROBE statement, a retrospective enrollment from records of patients who underwent anterior CDF and/or CCF between June 2015 and June 2022. Linear mixed models were applied to establish the effects of the type of surgery according to the follow-up time (mo).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 21 (28.8%) were included in the CDF group and 52 (71.2%) in the CCF group. Twenty surgeries were performed at 3 cervical levels and 53 at 4 levels. There was an improvement in the NDI and VAS score, with an Odom mean of 1.63±0.67 at 12 months of follow-up, with no differences between CDF and CCF. In the CDF group, it was reported a greater C2-7 Cobb angle at the third month of follow-up. In the CCF group, the C2-7 Cobb angle had a negative correlation with the NDI and VAS scales, and a positive correlation with the mJOA scale. Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in CDF. There were no differences between the 2 groups in medical complications and other radiologic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgery for multilevel DCM using an anterior approach with CDF or CCF showed good clinical outcomes without significant differences between the 2 groups, and equivalent results in medical complications and radiologic parameters. The CDF group had better perioperative results and shorter postoperative hospitalization time.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Corpectomy With Iliac Crest Graft and Fusion in Multilevel Degenerative Myelopathy: A Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio A Rivas Palacios, Mario M Barbosa, María A Escobar, Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas, Camilo García, Salvador M Mattar, Salvador Mattar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated and compared the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (CDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy with iliac crest graft and fusion (CCF) in patients with ≥3 level degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior and posterior approaches are widely employed in DCM when compressive elements predominate in the anterior or posterior spinal cord, respectively. Indications for each approach remain controversial in some contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the STROBE statement, a retrospective enrollment from records of patients who underwent anterior CDF and/or CCF between June 2015 and June 2022. Linear mixed models were applied to establish the effects of the type of surgery according to the follow-up time (mo).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 21 (28.8%) were included in the CDF group and 52 (71.2%) in the CCF group. Twenty surgeries were performed at 3 cervical levels and 53 at 4 levels. There was an improvement in the NDI and VAS score, with an Odom mean of 1.63±0.67 at 12 months of follow-up, with no differences between CDF and CCF. In the CDF group, it was reported a greater C2-7 Cobb angle at the third month of follow-up. In the CCF group, the C2-7 Cobb angle had a negative correlation with the NDI and VAS scales, and a positive correlation with the mJOA scale. Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in CDF. There were no differences between the 2 groups in medical complications and other radiologic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgery for multilevel DCM using an anterior approach with CDF or CCF showed good clinical outcomes without significant differences between the 2 groups, and equivalent results in medical complications and radiologic parameters. The CDF group had better perioperative results and shorter postoperative hospitalization time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Corpectomy With Iliac Crest Graft and Fusion in Multilevel Degenerative Myelopathy: A Single Center Experience.
Study design: Cohort retrospective study.
Objective: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (CDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy with iliac crest graft and fusion (CCF) in patients with ≥3 level degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
Background: Anterior and posterior approaches are widely employed in DCM when compressive elements predominate in the anterior or posterior spinal cord, respectively. Indications for each approach remain controversial in some contexts.
Methods: Following the STROBE statement, a retrospective enrollment from records of patients who underwent anterior CDF and/or CCF between June 2015 and June 2022. Linear mixed models were applied to establish the effects of the type of surgery according to the follow-up time (mo).
Results: In this study, 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 21 (28.8%) were included in the CDF group and 52 (71.2%) in the CCF group. Twenty surgeries were performed at 3 cervical levels and 53 at 4 levels. There was an improvement in the NDI and VAS score, with an Odom mean of 1.63±0.67 at 12 months of follow-up, with no differences between CDF and CCF. In the CDF group, it was reported a greater C2-7 Cobb angle at the third month of follow-up. In the CCF group, the C2-7 Cobb angle had a negative correlation with the NDI and VAS scales, and a positive correlation with the mJOA scale. Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in CDF. There were no differences between the 2 groups in medical complications and other radiologic findings.
Conclusion: Surgery for multilevel DCM using an anterior approach with CDF or CCF showed good clinical outcomes without significant differences between the 2 groups, and equivalent results in medical complications and radiologic parameters. The CDF group had better perioperative results and shorter postoperative hospitalization time.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.