{"title":"癌症护理的保险事先授权负担:来自放射肿瘤学的证据综述。","authors":"Jayden Gracie MD , Rachel Jimenez MD , Karen M. Winkfield MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Despite its high cost-effectiveness, radiation oncology faces the greatest prior authorization (PA) burden of any medical specialty. Insurance denials and resulting treatment delays have been documented across several treatment modalities, including stereotactic body radiation, intensity modulated radiation, and proton therapy. Although insurance companies suggest that PA is intended to control health care spending and ensure the implementation of evidence-based practice, the number of radiation treatment plans reviewed by the PA process that result in changes is quite low. Yet, the cost to patients, providers, and the health care system is rising.</div><div>The increased administrative work required to address the appeal process, including the development of radiation plan comparisons, results in lost productivity of radiation staff and increased clinic costs that are not currently reimbursed. Treatment delays from PA may elevate patient anxiety and affect their ability to enroll in clinical trials, resulting in decreased quality of care. As a result of possible harm to patients, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a ruling that mandates increased transparency of insurers’ requirements, decreased allowable time for arriving at PA decisions, and a more efficient electronic communication system to address the time and resource burden of PA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>This article summarizes key discussions from the literature and provides recommendations to help mitigate insurance PA strain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>These recommendations broadly address the following key areas: (1) omission of PA for routine care and clinical trials, (2) implementation of efficient, streamlined electronic peer-to-peer communication, (3) increased transparency of insurance requirements and rationale for denials, and (4) decreased time allowances for PA decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policy reform focused on evidence-driven treatment coverage, reduction of the proportion of cases requiring PA, and a simplified, timely insurance appeal process is necessary to ensure optimal cancer care for patients requiring radiation therapy as part of their cancer journey.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 101654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Burden of Insurance Prior Authorization on Cancer Care: A Review of Evidence From Radiation Oncology\",\"authors\":\"Jayden Gracie MD , Rachel Jimenez MD , Karen M. Winkfield MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Despite its high cost-effectiveness, radiation oncology faces the greatest prior authorization (PA) burden of any medical specialty. Insurance denials and resulting treatment delays have been documented across several treatment modalities, including stereotactic body radiation, intensity modulated radiation, and proton therapy. Although insurance companies suggest that PA is intended to control health care spending and ensure the implementation of evidence-based practice, the number of radiation treatment plans reviewed by the PA process that result in changes is quite low. Yet, the cost to patients, providers, and the health care system is rising.</div><div>The increased administrative work required to address the appeal process, including the development of radiation plan comparisons, results in lost productivity of radiation staff and increased clinic costs that are not currently reimbursed. Treatment delays from PA may elevate patient anxiety and affect their ability to enroll in clinical trials, resulting in decreased quality of care. As a result of possible harm to patients, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a ruling that mandates increased transparency of insurers’ requirements, decreased allowable time for arriving at PA decisions, and a more efficient electronic communication system to address the time and resource burden of PA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>This article summarizes key discussions from the literature and provides recommendations to help mitigate insurance PA strain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>These recommendations broadly address the following key areas: (1) omission of PA for routine care and clinical trials, (2) implementation of efficient, streamlined electronic peer-to-peer communication, (3) increased transparency of insurance requirements and rationale for denials, and (4) decreased time allowances for PA decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policy reform focused on evidence-driven treatment coverage, reduction of the proportion of cases requiring PA, and a simplified, timely insurance appeal process is necessary to ensure optimal cancer care for patients requiring radiation therapy as part of their cancer journey.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424002173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424002173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Burden of Insurance Prior Authorization on Cancer Care: A Review of Evidence From Radiation Oncology
Purpose
Despite its high cost-effectiveness, radiation oncology faces the greatest prior authorization (PA) burden of any medical specialty. Insurance denials and resulting treatment delays have been documented across several treatment modalities, including stereotactic body radiation, intensity modulated radiation, and proton therapy. Although insurance companies suggest that PA is intended to control health care spending and ensure the implementation of evidence-based practice, the number of radiation treatment plans reviewed by the PA process that result in changes is quite low. Yet, the cost to patients, providers, and the health care system is rising.
The increased administrative work required to address the appeal process, including the development of radiation plan comparisons, results in lost productivity of radiation staff and increased clinic costs that are not currently reimbursed. Treatment delays from PA may elevate patient anxiety and affect their ability to enroll in clinical trials, resulting in decreased quality of care. As a result of possible harm to patients, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a ruling that mandates increased transparency of insurers’ requirements, decreased allowable time for arriving at PA decisions, and a more efficient electronic communication system to address the time and resource burden of PA.
Methods and Materials
This article summarizes key discussions from the literature and provides recommendations to help mitigate insurance PA strain.
Results
These recommendations broadly address the following key areas: (1) omission of PA for routine care and clinical trials, (2) implementation of efficient, streamlined electronic peer-to-peer communication, (3) increased transparency of insurance requirements and rationale for denials, and (4) decreased time allowances for PA decisions.
Conclusions
Policy reform focused on evidence-driven treatment coverage, reduction of the proportion of cases requiring PA, and a simplified, timely insurance appeal process is necessary to ensure optimal cancer care for patients requiring radiation therapy as part of their cancer journey.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.