持续血糖监测对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Isabel Hinojal, Angel Chimenea, Guillermo Antiñolo, Lutgardo García-Díaz
{"title":"持续血糖监测对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响。","authors":"Isabel Hinojal, Angel Chimenea, Guillermo Antiñolo, Lutgardo García-Díaz","doi":"10.1007/s00592-024-02439-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 387 pregnant women with PGDM at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital in Seville, spanning from 2016 to 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups: 212 women who used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and 175 women who self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). The study evaluated maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, delivery methods, neonatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CGM group exhibited lower weight gain during pregnancy (9.6 kg vs. 10.0 kg, p = 0.02) and required fewer prenatal visits (7 vs. 8, p = 0.01). The rate of cesarean sections was significantly lower in the CGM group (53.1% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.03), and the incidence of macrosomia was reduced (12.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal deaths, or neonatal deaths between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGM in pregnant women with PGDM is associated with better pregnancy outcomes, including reduced cesarean section rates and lower incidence of macrosomia. These findings support the wider implementation of CGM for improved maternal and fetal health in PGDM pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Hinojal, Angel Chimenea, Guillermo Antiñolo, Lutgardo García-Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00592-024-02439-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 387 pregnant women with PGDM at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital in Seville, spanning from 2016 to 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups: 212 women who used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and 175 women who self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). The study evaluated maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, delivery methods, neonatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CGM group exhibited lower weight gain during pregnancy (9.6 kg vs. 10.0 kg, p = 0.02) and required fewer prenatal visits (7 vs. 8, p = 0.01). The rate of cesarean sections was significantly lower in the CGM group (53.1% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.03), and the incidence of macrosomia was reduced (12.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal deaths, or neonatal deaths between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGM in pregnant women with PGDM is associated with better pregnancy outcomes, including reduced cesarean section rates and lower incidence of macrosomia. These findings support the wider implementation of CGM for improved maternal and fetal health in PGDM pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02439-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02439-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估连续血糖监测(CGM)对妊娠期糖尿病(PGDM)妇女妊娠结局的影响。方法:对2016年至2022年在西班牙塞维利亚圣母大学Rocío大学医院就诊的387例妊娠期妊娠糖尿病孕妇进行回顾性队列研究。这些患者被分为两组:212名女性使用连续血糖监测(CGM), 175名女性使用自我血糖监测(SMBG)。该研究评估了产妇特征、妊娠并发症、分娩方法、新生儿结局和先天性异常。结果:CGM组妊娠期体重增加较低(9.6 kg vs. 10.0 kg, p = 0.02),产前就诊较少(7 vs. 8, p = 0.01)。CGM组剖宫产率显著降低(53.1%比58.2%,p = 0.03),巨大儿发生率显著降低(12.9%比22.2%,p = 0.04)。两组间在先天性异常、宫内胎儿死亡或新生儿死亡方面无显著差异。结论:妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的CGM与更好的妊娠结局相关,包括降低剖宫产率和降低巨大儿发生率。这些发现支持更广泛地实施CGM,以改善妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的母婴健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 387 pregnant women with PGDM at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital in Seville, spanning from 2016 to 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups: 212 women who used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and 175 women who self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). The study evaluated maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, delivery methods, neonatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies.

Results: The CGM group exhibited lower weight gain during pregnancy (9.6 kg vs. 10.0 kg, p = 0.02) and required fewer prenatal visits (7 vs. 8, p = 0.01). The rate of cesarean sections was significantly lower in the CGM group (53.1% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.03), and the incidence of macrosomia was reduced (12.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal deaths, or neonatal deaths between the groups.

Conclusions: CGM in pregnant women with PGDM is associated with better pregnancy outcomes, including reduced cesarean section rates and lower incidence of macrosomia. These findings support the wider implementation of CGM for improved maternal and fetal health in PGDM pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信