一项针对8151名患者的分析表明,在订单集驱动的倡议后,败血症死亡率的种族差异降低。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Maria L Fernandez Olivera, Carl Pafford, Thomas Lardaro, Steven K Roumpf, Michele Saysana, Benton R Hunter
{"title":"一项针对8151名患者的分析表明,在订单集驱动的倡议后,败血症死亡率的种族差异降低。","authors":"Maria L Fernandez Olivera, Carl Pafford, Thomas Lardaro, Steven K Roumpf, Michele Saysana, Benton R Hunter","doi":"10.1111/acem.15083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality and there is evidence that outcomes vary by patient demographics including race and gender. Our objectives were to determine whether the introduction of a standardized sepsis order set was associated with (1) changes in overall mortality or early antibiotic administration or (2) changes in outcome disparities based on race or gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients seen in the emergency department and admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis code of sepsis were identified and divided into a preintervention cohort seen during the 18 months prior to the initiation of a new sepsis order set and an intervention cohort seen during the 18 months after a quality initiative driven by introducing the order set. Associations between time period, race, gender, and mortality were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Other outcomes included early antibiotic administration (<3 h from arrival).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall mortality was unchanged during the intervention period (7.8% vs. 7.2%) in both univariate (relative risk [RR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.26) and multivariate logistic regression (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93-1.28) models. Although male gender tended to have higher mortality, there was no statistically significant association between gender and mortality in either cohort. In the multivariable model, Black race was associated with increased risk of death in the preintervention period (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.94), but this association was not present in the intervention period. Patients of color also saw significantly more improvement in early antibiotic administration during the intervention period than White patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An order set-driven sepsis initiative was not associated with overall improved mortality but was associated with decreased racial disparities in sepsis mortality and early antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decreased racial disparities in sepsis mortality after an order set-driven initiative: An analysis of 8151 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Maria L Fernandez Olivera, Carl Pafford, Thomas Lardaro, Steven K Roumpf, Michele Saysana, Benton R Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.15083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality and there is evidence that outcomes vary by patient demographics including race and gender. Our objectives were to determine whether the introduction of a standardized sepsis order set was associated with (1) changes in overall mortality or early antibiotic administration or (2) changes in outcome disparities based on race or gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients seen in the emergency department and admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis code of sepsis were identified and divided into a preintervention cohort seen during the 18 months prior to the initiation of a new sepsis order set and an intervention cohort seen during the 18 months after a quality initiative driven by introducing the order set. Associations between time period, race, gender, and mortality were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Other outcomes included early antibiotic administration (<3 h from arrival).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall mortality was unchanged during the intervention period (7.8% vs. 7.2%) in both univariate (relative risk [RR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.26) and multivariate logistic regression (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93-1.28) models. Although male gender tended to have higher mortality, there was no statistically significant association between gender and mortality in either cohort. In the multivariable model, Black race was associated with increased risk of death in the preintervention period (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.94), but this association was not present in the intervention period. Patients of color also saw significantly more improvement in early antibiotic administration during the intervention period than White patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An order set-driven sepsis initiative was not associated with overall improved mortality but was associated with decreased racial disparities in sepsis mortality and early antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒症是医院死亡的主要原因,有证据表明,脓毒症的结局因患者的种族和性别而异。我们的目的是确定标准化脓毒症顺序的引入是否与(1)总体死亡率或早期抗生素给药的变化或(2)基于种族或性别的结果差异的变化有关。方法:对急诊就诊并以脓毒症诊断代码入院的患者进行识别,并将其分为在启动新的脓毒症医嘱集之前18个月内出现的干预前队列和在引入医嘱集后18个月内出现的干预队列。使用单变量和多变量logistic回归模型评估时间段、种族、性别和死亡率之间的关联。其他结果包括早期抗生素使用(结果:在单因素(相对危险度[RR] 1.08, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.93-1.26)和多因素logistic回归(RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93-1.28)模型中,干预期间的总死亡率没有变化(7.8% vs. 7.2%)。尽管男性倾向于有更高的死亡率,但在两个队列中,性别和死亡率之间没有统计学上显著的关联。在多变量模型中,黑人种族在干预前与死亡风险增加相关(RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.94),但在干预期间不存在这种关联。在干预期间,有色人种患者在早期抗生素使用方面也比白人患者有明显的改善。结论:订单集驱动的脓毒症主动性与总体死亡率改善无关,但与脓毒症死亡率和早期抗生素的种族差异减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decreased racial disparities in sepsis mortality after an order set-driven initiative: An analysis of 8151 patients.

Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality and there is evidence that outcomes vary by patient demographics including race and gender. Our objectives were to determine whether the introduction of a standardized sepsis order set was associated with (1) changes in overall mortality or early antibiotic administration or (2) changes in outcome disparities based on race or gender.

Methods: Patients seen in the emergency department and admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis code of sepsis were identified and divided into a preintervention cohort seen during the 18 months prior to the initiation of a new sepsis order set and an intervention cohort seen during the 18 months after a quality initiative driven by introducing the order set. Associations between time period, race, gender, and mortality were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Other outcomes included early antibiotic administration (<3 h from arrival).

Results: Overall mortality was unchanged during the intervention period (7.8% vs. 7.2%) in both univariate (relative risk [RR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.26) and multivariate logistic regression (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93-1.28) models. Although male gender tended to have higher mortality, there was no statistically significant association between gender and mortality in either cohort. In the multivariable model, Black race was associated with increased risk of death in the preintervention period (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.94), but this association was not present in the intervention period. Patients of color also saw significantly more improvement in early antibiotic administration during the intervention period than White patients.

Conclusions: An order set-driven sepsis initiative was not associated with overall improved mortality but was associated with decreased racial disparities in sepsis mortality and early antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信