预测肿瘤学的特点

IF 29.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Akshat Singhal, Xiaoyu Zhao, Patrick Wall, Emily So, Guido Calderini, Alexander Partin, Natasha Koussa, Priyanka Vasanthakumari, Oleksandr Narykov, Yitan Zhu, Sara E. Jones, Farnoosh Abbas-Aghababazadeh, Sisira Kadambat Nair, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Athmeya Jayaram, Barbara A. Parker, Kay T. Yeung, Jason I. Griffiths, Ryan Weil, Aritro Nath, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Trey Ideker
{"title":"预测肿瘤学的特点","authors":"Akshat Singhal, Xiaoyu Zhao, Patrick Wall, Emily So, Guido Calderini, Alexander Partin, Natasha Koussa, Priyanka Vasanthakumari, Oleksandr Narykov, Yitan Zhu, Sara E. Jones, Farnoosh Abbas-Aghababazadeh, Sisira Kadambat Nair, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Athmeya Jayaram, Barbara A. Parker, Kay T. Yeung, Jason I. Griffiths, Ryan Weil, Aritro Nath, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Trey Ideker","doi":"10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid evolution of machine learning has led to a proliferation of sophisticated models for predicting therapeutic responses in cancer. While many of these show promise in research, standards for clinical evaluation and adoption are lacking. Here, we propose seven hallmarks by which predictive oncology models can be assessed and compared. These are Data Relevance and Actionability, Expressive Architecture, Standardized Benchmarking, Generalizability, Interpretability, Accessibility and Reproducibility, and Fairness. Considerations for each hallmark are discussed along with an example model scorecard. We encourage the broader community, including researchers, clinicians, and regulators, to engage in shaping these guidelines toward a concise set of standards. Significance: As the field of artificial intelligence evolves rapidly, these hallmarks are intended to capture fundamental, complementary concepts necessary for the progress and timely adoption of predictive modeling in precision oncology. Through these hallmarks, we hope to establish standards and guidelines that enable the symbiotic development of artificial intelligence and precision oncology.","PeriodicalId":9430,"journal":{"name":"Cancer discovery","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hallmarks of Predictive Oncology\",\"authors\":\"Akshat Singhal, Xiaoyu Zhao, Patrick Wall, Emily So, Guido Calderini, Alexander Partin, Natasha Koussa, Priyanka Vasanthakumari, Oleksandr Narykov, Yitan Zhu, Sara E. Jones, Farnoosh Abbas-Aghababazadeh, Sisira Kadambat Nair, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Athmeya Jayaram, Barbara A. Parker, Kay T. Yeung, Jason I. Griffiths, Ryan Weil, Aritro Nath, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Trey Ideker\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid evolution of machine learning has led to a proliferation of sophisticated models for predicting therapeutic responses in cancer. While many of these show promise in research, standards for clinical evaluation and adoption are lacking. Here, we propose seven hallmarks by which predictive oncology models can be assessed and compared. These are Data Relevance and Actionability, Expressive Architecture, Standardized Benchmarking, Generalizability, Interpretability, Accessibility and Reproducibility, and Fairness. Considerations for each hallmark are discussed along with an example model scorecard. We encourage the broader community, including researchers, clinicians, and regulators, to engage in shaping these guidelines toward a concise set of standards. Significance: As the field of artificial intelligence evolves rapidly, these hallmarks are intended to capture fundamental, complementary concepts necessary for the progress and timely adoption of predictive modeling in precision oncology. Through these hallmarks, we hope to establish standards and guidelines that enable the symbiotic development of artificial intelligence and precision oncology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer discovery\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":29.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0760\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习的快速发展导致了预测癌症治疗反应的复杂模型的激增。虽然其中许多在研究中显示出希望,但缺乏临床评估和采用的标准。在这里,我们提出了预测肿瘤模型可以评估和比较的七个标志。它们是数据相关性和可操作性、表达性架构、标准化基准、概括性、可解释性、可访问性和可再现性以及公平性。每个标志的注意事项将与示例模型记分卡一起讨论。我们鼓励更广泛的社区,包括研究人员、临床医生和监管机构,参与将这些指南塑造成一套简明的标准。意义:随着人工智能领域的快速发展,这些标志旨在捕捉精确肿瘤学预测建模进展和及时采用所需的基本、互补概念。通过这些标志,我们希望建立标准和指导方针,使人工智能和精准肿瘤学能够共生发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Hallmarks of Predictive Oncology
The rapid evolution of machine learning has led to a proliferation of sophisticated models for predicting therapeutic responses in cancer. While many of these show promise in research, standards for clinical evaluation and adoption are lacking. Here, we propose seven hallmarks by which predictive oncology models can be assessed and compared. These are Data Relevance and Actionability, Expressive Architecture, Standardized Benchmarking, Generalizability, Interpretability, Accessibility and Reproducibility, and Fairness. Considerations for each hallmark are discussed along with an example model scorecard. We encourage the broader community, including researchers, clinicians, and regulators, to engage in shaping these guidelines toward a concise set of standards. Significance: As the field of artificial intelligence evolves rapidly, these hallmarks are intended to capture fundamental, complementary concepts necessary for the progress and timely adoption of predictive modeling in precision oncology. Through these hallmarks, we hope to establish standards and guidelines that enable the symbiotic development of artificial intelligence and precision oncology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer discovery
Cancer discovery ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
838
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Discovery publishes high-impact, peer-reviewed articles detailing significant advances in both research and clinical trials. Serving as a premier cancer information resource, the journal also features Review Articles, Perspectives, Commentaries, News stories, and Research Watch summaries to keep readers abreast of the latest findings in the field. Covering a wide range of topics, from laboratory research to clinical trials and epidemiologic studies, Cancer Discovery spans the entire spectrum of cancer research and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信