抽象决策问题的Copeland比率排序方法

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Weibin Han , Adrian Van Deemen
{"title":"抽象决策问题的Copeland比率排序方法","authors":"Weibin Han ,&nbsp;Adrian Van Deemen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper deals with the problem of ranking a finite number of alternatives on the basis of a dominance relation. We firstly investigate some disadvantages of the Copeland ranking method, of the degree ratio ranking method and of the modified degree ratio ranking method which were characterized by using clone properties and classical axiomatic properties. Then, we introduce some alternative axiomatic properties and propose a new ranking method which is defined by the Copeland ratio of alternatives (i.e., the Copeland score of an alternative divided by its total degree). We show that this proposed ranking method coincides with the Copeland ranking method, the degree ratio ranking method and the modified degree ratio ranking method for abstract decision problems with complete and asymmetric dominance relations. Subsequently, we prove that this new ranking method is able to overcome the mentioned disadvantages of these ranking methods. After that, we provide a characterization for the Copeland ratio ranking method using the introduced axiomatic properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"323 3","pages":"Pages 966-974"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Copeland ratio ranking method for abstract decision problems\",\"authors\":\"Weibin Han ,&nbsp;Adrian Van Deemen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper deals with the problem of ranking a finite number of alternatives on the basis of a dominance relation. We firstly investigate some disadvantages of the Copeland ranking method, of the degree ratio ranking method and of the modified degree ratio ranking method which were characterized by using clone properties and classical axiomatic properties. Then, we introduce some alternative axiomatic properties and propose a new ranking method which is defined by the Copeland ratio of alternatives (i.e., the Copeland score of an alternative divided by its total degree). We show that this proposed ranking method coincides with the Copeland ranking method, the degree ratio ranking method and the modified degree ratio ranking method for abstract decision problems with complete and asymmetric dominance relations. Subsequently, we prove that this new ranking method is able to overcome the mentioned disadvantages of these ranking methods. After that, we provide a characterization for the Copeland ratio ranking method using the introduced axiomatic properties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Operational Research\",\"volume\":\"323 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 966-974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Operational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009846\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了基于优势关系的有限个备选方案排序问题。首先分析了Copeland排序法、度比排序法和改进的度比排序法的缺点,这三种方法均以克隆性和经典公理性质为特征。然后,我们引入了一些备选公理性质,并提出了一种新的排序方法,该方法由备选的Copeland比率(即备选的Copeland分数除以其总度)来定义。结果表明,该排序方法与Copeland排序方法、度比排序方法和改进的度比排序方法一致,适用于具有完全和不对称优势关系的抽象决策问题。随后,我们证明了这种新的排名方法能够克服上述排名方法的缺点。然后,我们利用引入的公理性质对Copeland比率排序方法进行了表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Copeland ratio ranking method for abstract decision problems
This paper deals with the problem of ranking a finite number of alternatives on the basis of a dominance relation. We firstly investigate some disadvantages of the Copeland ranking method, of the degree ratio ranking method and of the modified degree ratio ranking method which were characterized by using clone properties and classical axiomatic properties. Then, we introduce some alternative axiomatic properties and propose a new ranking method which is defined by the Copeland ratio of alternatives (i.e., the Copeland score of an alternative divided by its total degree). We show that this proposed ranking method coincides with the Copeland ranking method, the degree ratio ranking method and the modified degree ratio ranking method for abstract decision problems with complete and asymmetric dominance relations. Subsequently, we prove that this new ranking method is able to overcome the mentioned disadvantages of these ranking methods. After that, we provide a characterization for the Copeland ratio ranking method using the introduced axiomatic properties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信