{"title":"评估助产领导方案:过程评估研究。","authors":"Malin Bogren , Paridhi Jha , Bharati Sharma , Kerstin Erlandsson","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite global support for midwifery leadership investment, there is a notable lack of scientific evaluations of leadership programmes worldwide for midwives. The Government of India’s Midwifery Initiative launched the Midwifery Leadership Programme to enhance the leadership capacity of state-level midwifery leaders.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the Midwifery Leadership Programme in India using implementation science as a framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative research design using the UK Medical Research Council guidance for process evaluation of a 12-week midwifery leadership programme in India. Data were collected through focus group discussions (n=6) with midwives and medical doctors, who have responsibility in maternal and child health services, midwifery education, practice and regulation, and individual interviews (n=3) with programme directors and a government representative, resulting in an individual participant total of 22. Transcribed discussions were analysed guided by an evaluation framework, using content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The midwifery leadership programme was successfully implemented in terms of fidelity, dose, and reach, with continuous adaptations. Having the programme’s design, structure, and content tailor-made for the Indian context was valued highly. Easy-to-follow assignments led to state-level action plans, while participants’ motivation and improved communication skills enhanced leadership capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates the utility of a process evaluation framework in evaluating midwifery education programmes, using the Midwifery Leadership Programme in India as an example. It is recommended that future research on evaluating midwifery education initiatives adopt implementation science frameworks to evaluate both the implementation process and the mechanisms driving programmes' impact for change, thereby informing the design and delivery of effective midwifery education programmes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101853"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a midwifery leadership programme: a process evaluation study\",\"authors\":\"Malin Bogren , Paridhi Jha , Bharati Sharma , Kerstin Erlandsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite global support for midwifery leadership investment, there is a notable lack of scientific evaluations of leadership programmes worldwide for midwives. The Government of India’s Midwifery Initiative launched the Midwifery Leadership Programme to enhance the leadership capacity of state-level midwifery leaders.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the Midwifery Leadership Programme in India using implementation science as a framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative research design using the UK Medical Research Council guidance for process evaluation of a 12-week midwifery leadership programme in India. Data were collected through focus group discussions (n=6) with midwives and medical doctors, who have responsibility in maternal and child health services, midwifery education, practice and regulation, and individual interviews (n=3) with programme directors and a government representative, resulting in an individual participant total of 22. Transcribed discussions were analysed guided by an evaluation framework, using content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The midwifery leadership programme was successfully implemented in terms of fidelity, dose, and reach, with continuous adaptations. Having the programme’s design, structure, and content tailor-made for the Indian context was valued highly. Easy-to-follow assignments led to state-level action plans, while participants’ motivation and improved communication skills enhanced leadership capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates the utility of a process evaluation framework in evaluating midwifery education programmes, using the Midwifery Leadership Programme in India as an example. It is recommended that future research on evaluating midwifery education initiatives adopt implementation science frameworks to evaluate both the implementation process and the mechanisms driving programmes' impact for change, thereby informing the design and delivery of effective midwifery education programmes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Birth\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Birth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224003135\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224003135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating a midwifery leadership programme: a process evaluation study
Background
Despite global support for midwifery leadership investment, there is a notable lack of scientific evaluations of leadership programmes worldwide for midwives. The Government of India’s Midwifery Initiative launched the Midwifery Leadership Programme to enhance the leadership capacity of state-level midwifery leaders.
Aim
To evaluate the Midwifery Leadership Programme in India using implementation science as a framework.
Methods
A qualitative research design using the UK Medical Research Council guidance for process evaluation of a 12-week midwifery leadership programme in India. Data were collected through focus group discussions (n=6) with midwives and medical doctors, who have responsibility in maternal and child health services, midwifery education, practice and regulation, and individual interviews (n=3) with programme directors and a government representative, resulting in an individual participant total of 22. Transcribed discussions were analysed guided by an evaluation framework, using content analysis.
Results
The midwifery leadership programme was successfully implemented in terms of fidelity, dose, and reach, with continuous adaptations. Having the programme’s design, structure, and content tailor-made for the Indian context was valued highly. Easy-to-follow assignments led to state-level action plans, while participants’ motivation and improved communication skills enhanced leadership capacity.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the utility of a process evaluation framework in evaluating midwifery education programmes, using the Midwifery Leadership Programme in India as an example. It is recommended that future research on evaluating midwifery education initiatives adopt implementation science frameworks to evaluate both the implementation process and the mechanisms driving programmes' impact for change, thereby informing the design and delivery of effective midwifery education programmes.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.