{"title":"失去亲人的父母参与共同设计的死产研究:参与项目的经验。","authors":"Kirstin Tindal , Danielle Pollock , Brad Farrant , Nicky Robinson , Yumi Oba , Ashley Pade , Jassy Moore , Siobhan Loughnan , Vicky Flenady , Christine Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While benefits of involving consumers in research are well established, bereaved parents face unique challenges, and descriptions of their experiences with co-designed stillbirth research are lacking. The collective experience of ‘<em>Project Engage’</em> involved co-designing resources to support bereaved parents’ involvement in research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study aimed to describe and evaluate the involvement of bereaved parents as co-investigators of a stillbirth research project. Descriptive and exploratory methods were used to describe the process of <em>Project Engage,</em> between 2021 and 2023, in which bereaved parents were involved in all aspects. Evaluation was performed through iterative review and reflection to examine barriers and enablers of co-designed stillbirth research.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The project team co-designed and published ‘<em>Getting Involved in Stillbirth Research: A guide for bereaved parents</em>’. Seven co-investigators completed the end-of-phase project evaluation, including five bereaved parents and two researchers without lived experience of stillbirth. Most co-investigators felt that their contribution was highly valued and that project outputs matched their expectations. Enablers of co-design included clear communication, having a shared goal, a supportive team, relevant outputs, and lived-experience researchers on the team. Barriers included research jargon, meeting logistics, support and maintaining engagement, role expectations, and institutional governance processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The co-design experience was perceived positively by both parents and researchers, with many key facilitators to the teams’ success identified. Evaluation of the experiences of bereaved parents and researchers co-designing stillbirth research is vital. The process and recommendations outlined here will guide future best practice for bereaved parent involvement in stillbirth research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101838"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bereaved parent involvement in co-designed stillbirth research: Experiences of Project Engage\",\"authors\":\"Kirstin Tindal , Danielle Pollock , Brad Farrant , Nicky Robinson , Yumi Oba , Ashley Pade , Jassy Moore , Siobhan Loughnan , Vicky Flenady , Christine Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While benefits of involving consumers in research are well established, bereaved parents face unique challenges, and descriptions of their experiences with co-designed stillbirth research are lacking. The collective experience of ‘<em>Project Engage’</em> involved co-designing resources to support bereaved parents’ involvement in research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study aimed to describe and evaluate the involvement of bereaved parents as co-investigators of a stillbirth research project. Descriptive and exploratory methods were used to describe the process of <em>Project Engage,</em> between 2021 and 2023, in which bereaved parents were involved in all aspects. Evaluation was performed through iterative review and reflection to examine barriers and enablers of co-designed stillbirth research.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The project team co-designed and published ‘<em>Getting Involved in Stillbirth Research: A guide for bereaved parents</em>’. Seven co-investigators completed the end-of-phase project evaluation, including five bereaved parents and two researchers without lived experience of stillbirth. Most co-investigators felt that their contribution was highly valued and that project outputs matched their expectations. Enablers of co-design included clear communication, having a shared goal, a supportive team, relevant outputs, and lived-experience researchers on the team. Barriers included research jargon, meeting logistics, support and maintaining engagement, role expectations, and institutional governance processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The co-design experience was perceived positively by both parents and researchers, with many key facilitators to the teams’ success identified. Evaluation of the experiences of bereaved parents and researchers co-designing stillbirth research is vital. The process and recommendations outlined here will guide future best practice for bereaved parent involvement in stillbirth research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Birth\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Birth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bereaved parent involvement in co-designed stillbirth research: Experiences of Project Engage
Background
While benefits of involving consumers in research are well established, bereaved parents face unique challenges, and descriptions of their experiences with co-designed stillbirth research are lacking. The collective experience of ‘Project Engage’ involved co-designing resources to support bereaved parents’ involvement in research.
Methods
This study aimed to describe and evaluate the involvement of bereaved parents as co-investigators of a stillbirth research project. Descriptive and exploratory methods were used to describe the process of Project Engage, between 2021 and 2023, in which bereaved parents were involved in all aspects. Evaluation was performed through iterative review and reflection to examine barriers and enablers of co-designed stillbirth research.
Findings
The project team co-designed and published ‘Getting Involved in Stillbirth Research: A guide for bereaved parents’. Seven co-investigators completed the end-of-phase project evaluation, including five bereaved parents and two researchers without lived experience of stillbirth. Most co-investigators felt that their contribution was highly valued and that project outputs matched their expectations. Enablers of co-design included clear communication, having a shared goal, a supportive team, relevant outputs, and lived-experience researchers on the team. Barriers included research jargon, meeting logistics, support and maintaining engagement, role expectations, and institutional governance processes.
Conclusion
The co-design experience was perceived positively by both parents and researchers, with many key facilitators to the teams’ success identified. Evaluation of the experiences of bereaved parents and researchers co-designing stillbirth research is vital. The process and recommendations outlined here will guide future best practice for bereaved parent involvement in stillbirth research.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.