血清前列腺特异性抗原为 4.0-10.0 纳克/毫升患者的前列腺癌诊断和分层自动深度放射线组学框架:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Bowen Zheng, Futian Mo, Xiaoran Shi, Wenhao Li, Quanyou Shen, Ling Zhang, Zhongjian Liao, Cungeng Fan, Yanping Liu, Junyuan Zhong, Genggeng Qin, Jie Tao, Shidong Lv, Qiang Wei
{"title":"血清前列腺特异性抗原为 4.0-10.0 纳克/毫升患者的前列腺癌诊断和分层自动深度放射线组学框架:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Bowen Zheng, Futian Mo, Xiaoran Shi, Wenhao Li, Quanyou Shen, Ling Zhang, Zhongjian Liao, Cungeng Fan, Yanping Liu, Junyuan Zhong, Genggeng Qin, Jie Tao, Shidong Lv, Qiang Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To develop an automatic deep-radiomics framework that diagnoses and stratifies prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 1124 patients with histological results and PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL were enrolled from one public dataset and two local institutions. An nnUNet was trained for prostate masks, and a feature extraction module identified suspicious lesion masks. Radiomics features were extracted from the biparametric magnetic resonance imaging using these masks. Machine learning models were developed to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa), and high-risk csPCa based on radiomics and clinical features. The models were evaluated in both internal and external cohorts. The best model was further compared with PSA density (PSAD), free to total PSA (F/T PSA), and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores in the external cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The models based on both radiomics and clinical features outperformed those based on radiomics or clinical features alone. The top-performing models achieved areas under the curve of 0.80, 0.88, and 0.83 on internal testing, and 0.79, 0.80, and 0.82 on external testing for diagnosing PCa, csPCa, and high-risk csPCa. Our deep-radiomics model surpassed PSAD, F/T PSA, and PI-RADS scores in an external cohort. Decision curve analysis indicated that our model offers greater net benefit than these methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep-radiomics model automatically segments prostate and suspicious lesions, diagnoses, and stages of PCa in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. Our method addresses the shortcomings of manual segmentation and inconsistency, delivering outstanding performance. It provides multilevel predictions to assist clinical decision-making and benefit patients with gray zone PSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automatic Deep-Radiomics Framework for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Stratification in Patients with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen of 4.0-10.0 ng/mL: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bowen Zheng, Futian Mo, Xiaoran Shi, Wenhao Li, Quanyou Shen, Ling Zhang, Zhongjian Liao, Cungeng Fan, Yanping Liu, Junyuan Zhong, Genggeng Qin, Jie Tao, Shidong Lv, Qiang Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To develop an automatic deep-radiomics framework that diagnoses and stratifies prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 1124 patients with histological results and PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL were enrolled from one public dataset and two local institutions. An nnUNet was trained for prostate masks, and a feature extraction module identified suspicious lesion masks. Radiomics features were extracted from the biparametric magnetic resonance imaging using these masks. Machine learning models were developed to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa), and high-risk csPCa based on radiomics and clinical features. The models were evaluated in both internal and external cohorts. The best model was further compared with PSA density (PSAD), free to total PSA (F/T PSA), and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores in the external cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The models based on both radiomics and clinical features outperformed those based on radiomics or clinical features alone. The top-performing models achieved areas under the curve of 0.80, 0.88, and 0.83 on internal testing, and 0.79, 0.80, and 0.82 on external testing for diagnosing PCa, csPCa, and high-risk csPCa. Our deep-radiomics model surpassed PSAD, F/T PSA, and PI-RADS scores in an external cohort. Decision curve analysis indicated that our model offers greater net benefit than these methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep-radiomics model automatically segments prostate and suspicious lesions, diagnoses, and stages of PCa in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. Our method addresses the shortcomings of manual segmentation and inconsistency, delivering outstanding performance. It provides multilevel predictions to assist clinical decision-making and benefit patients with gray zone PSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理和目的:开发一个自动深度放射组学框架,用于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平在4至10 ng/mL之间的患者的前列腺癌诊断和分层。材料和方法:从一个公共数据集和两个地方机构共纳入1124例组织学结果和PSA水平在4至10 ng/mL之间的患者。利用nnUNet对前列腺遮罩进行训练,并利用特征提取模块对可疑病变遮罩进行识别。利用这些掩模从双参数磁共振成像中提取放射组学特征。基于放射组学和临床特征,开发机器学习模型诊断前列腺癌(PCa)、临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)和高危前列腺癌(csPCa)。模型在内部和外部队列中进行评估。将最佳模型进一步与外部队列中的PSA密度(PSAD)、游离PSA与总PSA (F/T PSA)以及前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分进行比较。结果:基于放射组学和临床特征的模型优于单独基于放射组学或临床特征的模型。在诊断PCa、csPCa和高风险csPCa时,表现最好的模型在内部测试上的曲线下面积分别为0.80、0.88和0.83,在外部测试上的曲线下面积分别为0.79、0.80和0.82。我们的深度放射组学模型在外部队列中超过了PSAD, F/T PSA和PI-RADS评分。决策曲线分析表明,我们的模型比这些方法提供了更大的净效益。结论:在PSA水平在4 ~ 10 ng/mL之间的患者中,深放射组学模型可自动分割前列腺和可疑病变、诊断和前列腺癌分期。该方法解决了人工分割和不一致的缺点,具有优异的性能。它提供了多层次的预测,以协助临床决策,使灰色地带PSA患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Automatic Deep-Radiomics Framework for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Stratification in Patients with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen of 4.0-10.0 ng/mL: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Rationale and objectives: To develop an automatic deep-radiomics framework that diagnoses and stratifies prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL.

Materials and methods: A total of 1124 patients with histological results and PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL were enrolled from one public dataset and two local institutions. An nnUNet was trained for prostate masks, and a feature extraction module identified suspicious lesion masks. Radiomics features were extracted from the biparametric magnetic resonance imaging using these masks. Machine learning models were developed to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa), and high-risk csPCa based on radiomics and clinical features. The models were evaluated in both internal and external cohorts. The best model was further compared with PSA density (PSAD), free to total PSA (F/T PSA), and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores in the external cohort.

Results: The models based on both radiomics and clinical features outperformed those based on radiomics or clinical features alone. The top-performing models achieved areas under the curve of 0.80, 0.88, and 0.83 on internal testing, and 0.79, 0.80, and 0.82 on external testing for diagnosing PCa, csPCa, and high-risk csPCa. Our deep-radiomics model surpassed PSAD, F/T PSA, and PI-RADS scores in an external cohort. Decision curve analysis indicated that our model offers greater net benefit than these methods.

Conclusion: The deep-radiomics model automatically segments prostate and suspicious lesions, diagnoses, and stages of PCa in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. Our method addresses the shortcomings of manual segmentation and inconsistency, delivering outstanding performance. It provides multilevel predictions to assist clinical decision-making and benefit patients with gray zone PSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信