Sophie Schlatter, Alexandre Berland, Antoine Lutz, Rebecca Shankland, Noémie Barret, Theodore Guillaumée, Antoine Duclos, Marion Cortet, Thomas Rimmelé, Gilles Rode, Marc Lilot
{"title":"应对干预对医学生客观结构化临床检查表现的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Sophie Schlatter, Alexandre Berland, Antoine Lutz, Rebecca Shankland, Noémie Barret, Theodore Guillaumée, Antoine Duclos, Marion Cortet, Thomas Rimmelé, Gilles Rode, Marc Lilot","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2431137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students' performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (-0.17 [95%CI, -1.20 to 0.86], <i>p</i> = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, -0.71 to 1.36], <i>p</i> = .540), or PPI groups (-0.25 [95%CI, -1.29 to 0.79], <i>p</i> = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0-8]), <i>p</i> < .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1-9], <i>p</i> = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0-4], <i>p</i> = .040]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Schlatter, Alexandre Berland, Antoine Lutz, Rebecca Shankland, Noémie Barret, Theodore Guillaumée, Antoine Duclos, Marion Cortet, Thomas Rimmelé, Gilles Rode, Marc Lilot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2431137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students' performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (-0.17 [95%CI, -1.20 to 0.86], <i>p</i> = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, -0.71 to 1.36], <i>p</i> = .540), or PPI groups (-0.25 [95%CI, -1.29 to 0.79], <i>p</i> = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0-8]), <i>p</i> < .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1-9], <i>p</i> = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0-4], <i>p</i> = .040]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2431137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2431137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目的结构化临床考试(OSCE)是一项评估医学能力的压力大的考试。压力应对策略有望提高学生在欧安组织期间的表现。目的是确定短期预防性应对干预对医学生表现的影响。材料与方法:双盲、多臂随机对照试验,优势假设。提议在2022年招收里昂东部大学欧安组织召集的所有四年级本科医科学生。没有排除标准。学生被随机分为四组:标准化呼吸与心脏生物反馈(BFB)、正念干预(MBI)、积极心理干预(PPI)或对照组(CTRL)。每次干预都有视频指导,持续6分钟,并在欧安组织会议开始之前进行。主要结果是欧安组织的学术得分,由对干预措施不知情的大学考官通过特定的网格进行评估。次要结果包括具体表现分数,以及学生对干预对其表现影响的感知。结果:共纳入482名学生。与对照组相比,BFB组(-0.17 [95%CI, -1.20至0.86],p = .749)、MBI组(0.32 [95%CI, -0.71至1.36],p = .540)或PPI组(-0.25 [95%CI, -1.29至0.79],p = .637)在学术OSCE得分上没有差异,具体表现得分也没有差异。与对照组相比,学生认为干预对他们的表现有更积极的影响(BFB +3 [95%CI, 0-8]), p p = 0.040;PPI +1 [95%CI, 0-4], p = 0.040])。结论:在OSCE之前,四年级医学生进行一次6分钟的心脏生物反馈、正念或积极心理干预并没有改善他们的学习成绩。尽管如此,学生们报告说,干预措施帮助他们提高了成绩。未来的研究应旨在进一步探讨干预对学生成绩的影响及其潜在的长期影响。试验注册:研究方案已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号:NCT05393219。
Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial.
Purpose: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students' performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students.
Materials and methods: Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance.
Results: A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (-0.17 [95%CI, -1.20 to 0.86], p = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, -0.71 to 1.36], p = .540), or PPI groups (-0.25 [95%CI, -1.29 to 0.79], p = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0-8]), p < .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1-9], p = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0-4], p = .040]).
Conclusions: A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students.
Trial registration: The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.