从重症监护环境中实施沟通促进干预的观点。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jennifer Im, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Danae Dotolo, Anna Ungar, Rebecca Barton, Bryan J Weiner, Kathryn I Pollak, Elizabeth Nielsen, Lisa Hudson, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Claire Creutzfeldt, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis
{"title":"从重症监护环境中实施沟通促进干预的观点。","authors":"Jennifer Im, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Danae Dotolo, Anna Ungar, Rebecca Barton, Bryan J Weiner, Kathryn I Pollak, Elizabeth Nielsen, Lisa Hudson, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Claire Creutzfeldt, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Critically-ill patients and their families often experience communication challenges during their ICU stay and across care transitions. An intervention using communication facilitators may help address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using clinicians' perspectives, we identified facilitators and barriers to implementing a communication intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using purposive sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 clinicians from an intensive care unit at an academic health center that participated in a randomized trial of communication facilitators. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide data collection and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFIR constructs of relative advantage, communication, and critical incidents facilitated the intervention's implementation. CFIR constructs of access to knowledge and information, relational connections, and clinician knowledge and belief hindered its implementation. Clinicians reported that facilitators provided continuity to patients and families, support in a trusting and proactive manner over transitions of care, and bridged communication between families and clinicians particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Limited information about the intervention prevented clinicians from working with facilitators earlier in the course of the intervention. Differences in beliefs regarding facilitator involvement during family meetings also hampered the intervention's implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should incorporate implementation strategies that help connect facilitators to clinicians early in the intervention period which may improve role clarity and enhance collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on Implementing a Communication Facilitator Intervention From a Critical Care Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Im, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Danae Dotolo, Anna Ungar, Rebecca Barton, Bryan J Weiner, Kathryn I Pollak, Elizabeth Nielsen, Lisa Hudson, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Claire Creutzfeldt, Ruth A Engelberg, J Randall Curtis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Critically-ill patients and their families often experience communication challenges during their ICU stay and across care transitions. An intervention using communication facilitators may help address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using clinicians' perspectives, we identified facilitators and barriers to implementing a communication intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using purposive sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 clinicians from an intensive care unit at an academic health center that participated in a randomized trial of communication facilitators. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide data collection and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFIR constructs of relative advantage, communication, and critical incidents facilitated the intervention's implementation. CFIR constructs of access to knowledge and information, relational connections, and clinician knowledge and belief hindered its implementation. Clinicians reported that facilitators provided continuity to patients and families, support in a trusting and proactive manner over transitions of care, and bridged communication between families and clinicians particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Limited information about the intervention prevented clinicians from working with facilitators earlier in the course of the intervention. Differences in beliefs regarding facilitator involvement during family meetings also hampered the intervention's implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should incorporate implementation strategies that help connect facilitators to clinicians early in the intervention period which may improve role clarity and enhance collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危重患者及其家属在ICU住院期间和护理过渡期间经常遇到沟通挑战。使用沟通促进者的干预可能有助于解决这些挑战。目的:从临床医生的角度,我们确定了实施沟通干预的促进因素和障碍。方法:采用有目的抽样,我们对参加交流促进者随机试验的学术卫生中心重症监护病房的17名临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。我们使用实施研究统一框架(CFIR)来指导数据收集和分析。结果:相对优势、沟通和关键事件的CFIR结构促进了干预的实施。知识和信息的获取、关系连接和临床医生的知识和信念的构建阻碍了CFIR的实施。临床医生报告说,辅导员为患者和家属提供了连续性,以信任和积极的方式支持护理过渡,并在家庭和临床医生之间架起了沟通的桥梁,特别是在Covid-19大流行期间。关于干预的有限信息阻碍了临床医生在干预过程的早期与辅导员合作。在家庭会议中对促进者参与的不同看法也阻碍了干预措施的实施。结论:未来的研究应纳入实施策略,帮助在干预期早期将促进者与临床医生联系起来,这可能会提高角色清晰度并加强合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives on Implementing a Communication Facilitator Intervention From a Critical Care Setting.

Context: Critically-ill patients and their families often experience communication challenges during their ICU stay and across care transitions. An intervention using communication facilitators may help address these challenges.

Objectives: Using clinicians' perspectives, we identified facilitators and barriers to implementing a communication intervention.

Methods: Using purposive sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 clinicians from an intensive care unit at an academic health center that participated in a randomized trial of communication facilitators. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide data collection and analysis.

Results: CFIR constructs of relative advantage, communication, and critical incidents facilitated the intervention's implementation. CFIR constructs of access to knowledge and information, relational connections, and clinician knowledge and belief hindered its implementation. Clinicians reported that facilitators provided continuity to patients and families, support in a trusting and proactive manner over transitions of care, and bridged communication between families and clinicians particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Limited information about the intervention prevented clinicians from working with facilitators earlier in the course of the intervention. Differences in beliefs regarding facilitator involvement during family meetings also hampered the intervention's implementation.

Conclusions: Future studies should incorporate implementation strategies that help connect facilitators to clinicians early in the intervention period which may improve role clarity and enhance collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信