Andreas Nowacki, David Y Zhang, Can Sarica, Gavin J B Elias, Sweta Bajaj, Angelo Franzini, Andrea Franzini, Assel Saryyeva, Thuy Anh Khoa Nguyen, Tipu Aziz, Joachim K Krauss, Wilhelm Eisner, Andres M Lozano, Alexander L Green, Claudio Pollo
{"title":"丘脑深部脑刺激治疗中枢性卒中后疼痛综合征:一项国际多中心研究。","authors":"Andreas Nowacki, David Y Zhang, Can Sarica, Gavin J B Elias, Sweta Bajaj, Angelo Franzini, Andrea Franzini, Assel Saryyeva, Thuy Anh Khoa Nguyen, Tipu Aziz, Joachim K Krauss, Wilhelm Eisner, Andres M Lozano, Alexander L Green, Claudio Pollo","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effectiveness and optimal stimulation site of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for central poststroke pain (CPSP) remain elusive. The objective of this retrospective international multicenter study was to assess clinical as well as neuroimaging-based predictors of long-term outcomes after DBS for CPSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed patient-based clinical and neuroimaging data of previously published and unpublished cohorts from 6 international DBS centers. DBS leads were reconstructed and normalized. A stimulation map was constructed on the basis of individual stimulation settings and associated outcomes. Furthermore, the authors projected the individual segmented stroke lesions and volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the stimulating electrode onto a normalized human connectome to obtain the connectivity profiles of the individual lesions and VTAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors analyzed the data of 54 patients, of whom 15 were excluded from the final analysis due to a lack of imaging data. Among the remaining 39 patients from 6 different cohorts, the authors found 14 (35.9%) responders who were defined by pain relief of at least 50% at 12-month follow-up. Stimulation mapping identified areas in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, the sensorimotor thalamus, and the medial and intralaminar thalamus as effective for pain reduction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between responders and nonresponders. The stimulation sites of the responders showed significantly reduced structural connectivity to the sensory areas of the cerebral cortex compared to nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive, multicenter analysis corroborates the efficacy of DBS in treating CPSP for a relevant number of patients. The posterior limb of the internal capsule and the sensorimotor thalamus emerged as potential stimulation sweet spots. The difference in structural connectivity between responders and nonresponders may constitute a biomarker of effective stimulation that can help guide surgical planning in future well-designed prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thalamic deep brain stimulation for central poststroke pain syndrome: an international multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Nowacki, David Y Zhang, Can Sarica, Gavin J B Elias, Sweta Bajaj, Angelo Franzini, Andrea Franzini, Assel Saryyeva, Thuy Anh Khoa Nguyen, Tipu Aziz, Joachim K Krauss, Wilhelm Eisner, Andres M Lozano, Alexander L Green, Claudio Pollo\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effectiveness and optimal stimulation site of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for central poststroke pain (CPSP) remain elusive. The objective of this retrospective international multicenter study was to assess clinical as well as neuroimaging-based predictors of long-term outcomes after DBS for CPSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed patient-based clinical and neuroimaging data of previously published and unpublished cohorts from 6 international DBS centers. DBS leads were reconstructed and normalized. A stimulation map was constructed on the basis of individual stimulation settings and associated outcomes. Furthermore, the authors projected the individual segmented stroke lesions and volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the stimulating electrode onto a normalized human connectome to obtain the connectivity profiles of the individual lesions and VTAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors analyzed the data of 54 patients, of whom 15 were excluded from the final analysis due to a lack of imaging data. Among the remaining 39 patients from 6 different cohorts, the authors found 14 (35.9%) responders who were defined by pain relief of at least 50% at 12-month follow-up. Stimulation mapping identified areas in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, the sensorimotor thalamus, and the medial and intralaminar thalamus as effective for pain reduction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between responders and nonresponders. The stimulation sites of the responders showed significantly reduced structural connectivity to the sensory areas of the cerebral cortex compared to nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive, multicenter analysis corroborates the efficacy of DBS in treating CPSP for a relevant number of patients. The posterior limb of the internal capsule and the sensorimotor thalamus emerged as potential stimulation sweet spots. The difference in structural connectivity between responders and nonresponders may constitute a biomarker of effective stimulation that can help guide surgical planning in future well-designed prospective trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thalamic deep brain stimulation for central poststroke pain syndrome: an international multicenter study.
Objective: The effectiveness and optimal stimulation site of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for central poststroke pain (CPSP) remain elusive. The objective of this retrospective international multicenter study was to assess clinical as well as neuroimaging-based predictors of long-term outcomes after DBS for CPSP.
Methods: The authors analyzed patient-based clinical and neuroimaging data of previously published and unpublished cohorts from 6 international DBS centers. DBS leads were reconstructed and normalized. A stimulation map was constructed on the basis of individual stimulation settings and associated outcomes. Furthermore, the authors projected the individual segmented stroke lesions and volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the stimulating electrode onto a normalized human connectome to obtain the connectivity profiles of the individual lesions and VTAs.
Results: The authors analyzed the data of 54 patients, of whom 15 were excluded from the final analysis due to a lack of imaging data. Among the remaining 39 patients from 6 different cohorts, the authors found 14 (35.9%) responders who were defined by pain relief of at least 50% at 12-month follow-up. Stimulation mapping identified areas in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, the sensorimotor thalamus, and the medial and intralaminar thalamus as effective for pain reduction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between responders and nonresponders. The stimulation sites of the responders showed significantly reduced structural connectivity to the sensory areas of the cerebral cortex compared to nonresponders.
Conclusions: This comprehensive, multicenter analysis corroborates the efficacy of DBS in treating CPSP for a relevant number of patients. The posterior limb of the internal capsule and the sensorimotor thalamus emerged as potential stimulation sweet spots. The difference in structural connectivity between responders and nonresponders may constitute a biomarker of effective stimulation that can help guide surgical planning in future well-designed prospective trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.