利用双侧横突根最背侧位置作为解剖标志的超声辅助胸中硬膜外导管置入:一项尸体观察研究和一项临床随机对照试验。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111740
Tatsuya Kunigo, Yusuke Yoshikawa, Shunichi Niki, Masahiro Ohtani, Mami Muraki, Asako Nitta, Yuki Ohsaki, Kanna Nagaishi, Michiaki Yamakage
{"title":"利用双侧横突根最背侧位置作为解剖标志的超声辅助胸中硬膜外导管置入:一项尸体观察研究和一项临床随机对照试验。","authors":"Tatsuya Kunigo, Yusuke Yoshikawa, Shunichi Niki, Masahiro Ohtani, Mami Muraki, Asako Nitta, Yuki Ohsaki, Kanna Nagaishi, Michiaki Yamakage","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>We developed an innovative method for ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement and assessed its potential to reduce procedural duration for trainees.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sapporo Medical University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 52 adult patients scheduled for thoracic or abdominal surgery and four cadavers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to either group receiving conventional palpation (conventional group) or combination of the ultrasound examination and conventional palpation (ultrasound group).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was total procedure time (sum of skin marking time and needling time) by trainees. The secondary outcomes were (1) skin marking time, (2) needling time, (3) multiple skin punctures, (4) needle redirection, (5) complications, and (6) failed cases.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Through dissection of four cadavers, the most dorsal site of the transverse process root was identifiable by ultrasound and the reliable indicator of the interlaminar space. We devised ultrasound-assisted middle thoracic epidural catheter placement utilizing the most dorsal sites of bilateral transverse process roots as anatomical landmarks. Trainees in the ultrasound group had significantly longer skin marking time and significantly shorter needling time than those in the conventional group (107 [87-158] vs 46 s [34-54] s, p < 0.001 and 197 [156-328] vs 341 [303-488] s, p = 0.003). Consequently, there was no significant difference between the two groups in total procedure time (326 [263-467] s vs 391 [354-533] s, p = 0.167). Moreover, the probability of trainee failure in epidural anesthesia was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (2/26 [17.7 %] vs 10/26 [38.5 %], p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement resulted in expedited needling and enhanced success rates among trainees, although there was no significant difference between total procedure time when using ultrasound guidance and that when using conventional palpation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"101 ","pages":"111740"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-assisted middle thoracic epidural catheter placement utilizing the most dorsal sites of bilateral transverse process roots as anatomical landmarks: A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Kunigo, Yusuke Yoshikawa, Shunichi Niki, Masahiro Ohtani, Mami Muraki, Asako Nitta, Yuki Ohsaki, Kanna Nagaishi, Michiaki Yamakage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>We developed an innovative method for ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement and assessed its potential to reduce procedural duration for trainees.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sapporo Medical University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 52 adult patients scheduled for thoracic or abdominal surgery and four cadavers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to either group receiving conventional palpation (conventional group) or combination of the ultrasound examination and conventional palpation (ultrasound group).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was total procedure time (sum of skin marking time and needling time) by trainees. The secondary outcomes were (1) skin marking time, (2) needling time, (3) multiple skin punctures, (4) needle redirection, (5) complications, and (6) failed cases.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Through dissection of four cadavers, the most dorsal site of the transverse process root was identifiable by ultrasound and the reliable indicator of the interlaminar space. We devised ultrasound-assisted middle thoracic epidural catheter placement utilizing the most dorsal sites of bilateral transverse process roots as anatomical landmarks. Trainees in the ultrasound group had significantly longer skin marking time and significantly shorter needling time than those in the conventional group (107 [87-158] vs 46 s [34-54] s, p < 0.001 and 197 [156-328] vs 341 [303-488] s, p = 0.003). Consequently, there was no significant difference between the two groups in total procedure time (326 [263-467] s vs 391 [354-533] s, p = 0.167). Moreover, the probability of trainee failure in epidural anesthesia was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (2/26 [17.7 %] vs 10/26 [38.5 %], p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement resulted in expedited needling and enhanced success rates among trainees, although there was no significant difference between total procedure time when using ultrasound guidance and that when using conventional palpation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"111740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:我们开发了一种超声辅助胸椎硬膜外导管置入的创新方法,并评估了其减少受训者手术时间的潜力。设计:一项尸体观察研究和一项临床随机对照试验。单位:札幌医科大学附属医院。患者:共52名计划进行胸部或腹部手术的成年患者和4具尸体。干预措施:患者随机分为常规触诊组(常规组)和超声检查与常规触诊联合组(超声组)。测量:主要观察指标为受训者的总手术时间(皮肤标记时间和针刺时间的总和)。次要结果为(1)皮肤标记时间,(2)针刺时间,(3)多次皮肤穿刺,(4)针重定向,(5)并发症,(6)失败病例。主要结果:通过对4具尸体的解剖,超声可识别横突根最背侧位置,并可作为椎间间隙的可靠指示。我们设计了超声辅助下的胸中硬膜外导管置入,利用双侧横突根最背侧的位置作为解剖标志。超声组受训者的皮肤标记时间明显长于常规组(107 [87-158]vs 46 s[34-54]),针刺时间明显短于常规组(107 [87-158]vs 46 s[34-54])。结论:我们的胸腔硬膜外置管新技术加快了受训者的穿刺速度,提高了受训者的成功率,尽管超声引导和常规触诊的总手术时间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-assisted middle thoracic epidural catheter placement utilizing the most dorsal sites of bilateral transverse process roots as anatomical landmarks: A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.

Study objective: We developed an innovative method for ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement and assessed its potential to reduce procedural duration for trainees.

Design: A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Sapporo Medical University Hospital.

Patients: A total of 52 adult patients scheduled for thoracic or abdominal surgery and four cadavers.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either group receiving conventional palpation (conventional group) or combination of the ultrasound examination and conventional palpation (ultrasound group).

Measurements: The primary outcome was total procedure time (sum of skin marking time and needling time) by trainees. The secondary outcomes were (1) skin marking time, (2) needling time, (3) multiple skin punctures, (4) needle redirection, (5) complications, and (6) failed cases.

Main results: Through dissection of four cadavers, the most dorsal site of the transverse process root was identifiable by ultrasound and the reliable indicator of the interlaminar space. We devised ultrasound-assisted middle thoracic epidural catheter placement utilizing the most dorsal sites of bilateral transverse process roots as anatomical landmarks. Trainees in the ultrasound group had significantly longer skin marking time and significantly shorter needling time than those in the conventional group (107 [87-158] vs 46 s [34-54] s, p < 0.001 and 197 [156-328] vs 341 [303-488] s, p = 0.003). Consequently, there was no significant difference between the two groups in total procedure time (326 [263-467] s vs 391 [354-533] s, p = 0.167). Moreover, the probability of trainee failure in epidural anesthesia was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (2/26 [17.7 %] vs 10/26 [38.5 %], p = 0.019).

Conclusions: Our novel technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement resulted in expedited needling and enhanced success rates among trainees, although there was no significant difference between total procedure time when using ultrasound guidance and that when using conventional palpation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信