{"title":"生命最后一年补充和替代药物的使用:COMPASS癌症队列研究。","authors":"Irene Teo PhD , Michelle Chow BSc , Isha Chaudhry MSc , Chetna Malhotra MBBS MD, MPH , Semra Ozdemir PhD , Eric A. Finkelstein PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>There has been growing interest in the role of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as part of end-of-life care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study prospectively examined the prevalence, predictors and outcomes of ingestible CAM use among cancer patients in their last year of life in Singapore.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study (N = 427) utilized data across 12 months (four time points) prior to patient death. Utilizing mixed effects logistic regressions, we examined sociodemographic, clinical (symptom burden) and treatment-related factors associated with CAM use. Subsequently, the association between patient quality of life (i.e., physical, social, emotional, functional well-being) and CAM use were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Half of the patients (50%) reported using CAM at least once in the last year of life while 36% of patients reported using CAM in the last 3 months of life. Among CAM users, 67% reported using western herbal supplements while 56% reported using traditional Chinese medicine. Further, 27–28% of patients used CAM consistently (i.e., for six months or more). Most patients (73%) reported using CAM as a complementary treatment. Patients who were ethnically Chinese (OR: 5.59, 95% <em>CI</em>: 2.29–13.69), reported less financial difficulties (OR: 0.82, 95% <em>CI</em>: 0.69–0.98), and believed in other curative treatments for cancer (OR: 2.39, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.00–5.70) were more likely to use CAM. Controlling for time, CAM use (<em>β:</em> 0.60, <em>CI</em>: 0.01–1.19) was associated with higher social well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A significant proportion of terminal cancer patients reported using CAM as a complementary treatment in the last year of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages e257-e264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in the Last Year of Life: The COMPASS Cancer Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Irene Teo PhD , Michelle Chow BSc , Isha Chaudhry MSc , Chetna Malhotra MBBS MD, MPH , Semra Ozdemir PhD , Eric A. Finkelstein PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>There has been growing interest in the role of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as part of end-of-life care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study prospectively examined the prevalence, predictors and outcomes of ingestible CAM use among cancer patients in their last year of life in Singapore.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study (N = 427) utilized data across 12 months (four time points) prior to patient death. Utilizing mixed effects logistic regressions, we examined sociodemographic, clinical (symptom burden) and treatment-related factors associated with CAM use. Subsequently, the association between patient quality of life (i.e., physical, social, emotional, functional well-being) and CAM use were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Half of the patients (50%) reported using CAM at least once in the last year of life while 36% of patients reported using CAM in the last 3 months of life. Among CAM users, 67% reported using western herbal supplements while 56% reported using traditional Chinese medicine. Further, 27–28% of patients used CAM consistently (i.e., for six months or more). Most patients (73%) reported using CAM as a complementary treatment. Patients who were ethnically Chinese (OR: 5.59, 95% <em>CI</em>: 2.29–13.69), reported less financial difficulties (OR: 0.82, 95% <em>CI</em>: 0.69–0.98), and believed in other curative treatments for cancer (OR: 2.39, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.00–5.70) were more likely to use CAM. Controlling for time, CAM use (<em>β:</em> 0.60, <em>CI</em>: 0.01–1.19) was associated with higher social well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A significant proportion of terminal cancer patients reported using CAM as a complementary treatment in the last year of life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e257-e264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424012296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424012296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in the Last Year of Life: The COMPASS Cancer Cohort Study
Context
There has been growing interest in the role of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as part of end-of-life care.
Objectives
This study prospectively examined the prevalence, predictors and outcomes of ingestible CAM use among cancer patients in their last year of life in Singapore.
Methods
This study (N = 427) utilized data across 12 months (four time points) prior to patient death. Utilizing mixed effects logistic regressions, we examined sociodemographic, clinical (symptom burden) and treatment-related factors associated with CAM use. Subsequently, the association between patient quality of life (i.e., physical, social, emotional, functional well-being) and CAM use were examined.
Results
Half of the patients (50%) reported using CAM at least once in the last year of life while 36% of patients reported using CAM in the last 3 months of life. Among CAM users, 67% reported using western herbal supplements while 56% reported using traditional Chinese medicine. Further, 27–28% of patients used CAM consistently (i.e., for six months or more). Most patients (73%) reported using CAM as a complementary treatment. Patients who were ethnically Chinese (OR: 5.59, 95% CI: 2.29–13.69), reported less financial difficulties (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98), and believed in other curative treatments for cancer (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.00–5.70) were more likely to use CAM. Controlling for time, CAM use (β: 0.60, CI: 0.01–1.19) was associated with higher social well-being.
Conclusions
A significant proportion of terminal cancer patients reported using CAM as a complementary treatment in the last year of life.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.