机器学习在心电图心肌纤维化检测中的作用:范围综述。

Q2 Medicine
JMIR Cardio Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.2196/60697
Julia Handra, Hannah James, Ashery Mbilinyi, Ashley Moller-Hansen, Callum O'Riley, Jason Andrade, Marc Deyell, Cameron Hague, Nathaniel Hawkins, Kendall Ho, Ricky Hu, Jonathon Leipsic, Roger Tam
{"title":"机器学习在心电图心肌纤维化检测中的作用:范围综述。","authors":"Julia Handra, Hannah James, Ashery Mbilinyi, Ashley Moller-Hansen, Callum O'Riley, Jason Andrade, Marc Deyell, Cameron Hague, Nathaniel Hawkins, Kendall Ho, Ricky Hu, Jonathon Leipsic, Roger Tam","doi":"10.2196/60697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Cardiac fibrosis impacts the underlying pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases by altering structural integrity and impairing electrical conduction. Identifying cardiac fibrosis is essential for the prognosis and management of cardiovascular disease; however, current diagnostic methods face challenges due to invasiveness, cost, and inaccessibility. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely available and cost-effective for monitoring cardiac electrical activity. While ECG-based methods for inferring fibrosis exist, they are not commonly used due to accuracy limitations and the need for cardiac expertise. However, the ECG shows promise as a target for machine learning (ML) applications in fibrosis detection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the current state of ECG-based ML approaches for cardiac fibrosis detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of research in ECG-based ML applications to identify cardiac fibrosis. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and DBLP databases, including publications up to October 2024. Studies were included if they applied ML techniques to detect cardiac fibrosis using ECG or vectorcardiogram data and provided sufficient methodological details and outcome metrics. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data on the ML models used, their performance metrics, study designs, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 studies evaluating ML approaches for detecting cardiac fibrosis using ECG data. These studies used various ML techniques, including classical (8/11, 73%), ensemble (3/11, 27%), and deep learning models (4/11, 36%). Support vector machines were the most used classical model (6/11, 55%), with the best-performing models of each study achieving accuracies of 77% to 93%. Among deep learning approaches, convolutional neural networks showed promising results, with one study reporting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 when combined with clinical features. Notably, a large-scale convolutional neural network study (n=14,052) achieved an AUC of 0.84 for detecting cardiac fibrosis, outperforming cardiologists (AUC 0.63-0.66). However, many studies had limited sample sizes and lacked external validation, potentially impacting the generalizability of the findings. Variability in reporting methods may affect the reproducibility and applicability of these ML-based approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML-augmented ECG analysis shows promise for accessible and cost-effective detection of cardiac fibrosis. However, there are common limitations with respect to study design and insufficient external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability and clinical applicability of the findings. Inconsistencies in methodologies and incomplete reporting further impede cross-study comparisons. Future work may benefit from using prospective study designs, larger and more clinically and demographically diverse datasets, advanced ML models, and rigorous external validation. Addressing these challenges could pave the way for the clinical implementation of ML-based ECG detection of cardiac fibrosis to improve patient outcomes and health care resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":"8 ","pages":"e60697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Machine Learning in the Detection of Cardiac Fibrosis in Electrocardiograms: Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Handra, Hannah James, Ashery Mbilinyi, Ashley Moller-Hansen, Callum O'Riley, Jason Andrade, Marc Deyell, Cameron Hague, Nathaniel Hawkins, Kendall Ho, Ricky Hu, Jonathon Leipsic, Roger Tam\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/60697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Cardiac fibrosis impacts the underlying pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases by altering structural integrity and impairing electrical conduction. Identifying cardiac fibrosis is essential for the prognosis and management of cardiovascular disease; however, current diagnostic methods face challenges due to invasiveness, cost, and inaccessibility. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely available and cost-effective for monitoring cardiac electrical activity. While ECG-based methods for inferring fibrosis exist, they are not commonly used due to accuracy limitations and the need for cardiac expertise. However, the ECG shows promise as a target for machine learning (ML) applications in fibrosis detection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the current state of ECG-based ML approaches for cardiac fibrosis detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of research in ECG-based ML applications to identify cardiac fibrosis. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and DBLP databases, including publications up to October 2024. Studies were included if they applied ML techniques to detect cardiac fibrosis using ECG or vectorcardiogram data and provided sufficient methodological details and outcome metrics. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data on the ML models used, their performance metrics, study designs, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 studies evaluating ML approaches for detecting cardiac fibrosis using ECG data. These studies used various ML techniques, including classical (8/11, 73%), ensemble (3/11, 27%), and deep learning models (4/11, 36%). Support vector machines were the most used classical model (6/11, 55%), with the best-performing models of each study achieving accuracies of 77% to 93%. Among deep learning approaches, convolutional neural networks showed promising results, with one study reporting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 when combined with clinical features. Notably, a large-scale convolutional neural network study (n=14,052) achieved an AUC of 0.84 for detecting cardiac fibrosis, outperforming cardiologists (AUC 0.63-0.66). However, many studies had limited sample sizes and lacked external validation, potentially impacting the generalizability of the findings. Variability in reporting methods may affect the reproducibility and applicability of these ML-based approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML-augmented ECG analysis shows promise for accessible and cost-effective detection of cardiac fibrosis. However, there are common limitations with respect to study design and insufficient external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability and clinical applicability of the findings. Inconsistencies in methodologies and incomplete reporting further impede cross-study comparisons. Future work may benefit from using prospective study designs, larger and more clinically and demographically diverse datasets, advanced ML models, and rigorous external validation. Addressing these challenges could pave the way for the clinical implementation of ML-based ECG detection of cardiac fibrosis to improve patient outcomes and health care resource allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Cardio\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e60697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Cardio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/60697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管疾病仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因。心脏纤维化通过改变结构完整性和损害电传导影响许多心血管疾病的潜在病理生理。识别心脏纤维化对心血管疾病的预后和治疗至关重要;然而,目前的诊断方法由于侵入性、成本和不可及性而面临挑战。心电图(ECGs)广泛用于监测心电活动,并且具有成本效益。虽然存在基于心电图推断纤维化的方法,但由于准确性的限制和对心脏专业知识的需求,这些方法并不常用。然而,心电图显示出作为机器学习(ML)在纤维化检测中的应用目标的希望。目的:本研究旨在综合和批判性地评价目前基于心电图的心肌纤维化检测方法的现状。方法:我们对基于心电图的ML应用识别心脏纤维化的研究进行了范围综述。在PubMed、IEEE explore、Scopus、Web of Science和DBLP数据库中进行了全面的搜索,包括截至2024年10月的出版物。如果研究应用ML技术使用ECG或矢量心电图数据检测心脏纤维化,并提供足够的方法学细节和结果指标,则纳入研究。两名审稿人独立评估了合格性,并提取了所使用的ML模型、其性能指标、研究设计和局限性的数据。结果:我们确定了11项研究,评估了使用ECG数据检测心脏纤维化的ML方法。这些研究使用了各种ML技术,包括经典(8/11,73%)、集成(3/11,27%)和深度学习模型(4/11,36%)。支持向量机是最常用的经典模型(6/11,55%),每项研究中表现最好的模型的准确率为77%至93%。在深度学习方法中,卷积神经网络显示出令人满意的结果,一项研究报告,当结合临床特征时,接受者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)为0.89。值得注意的是,一项大规模卷积神经网络研究(n= 14052)在检测心脏纤维化方面的AUC为0.84,优于心脏病专家(AUC为0.63-0.66)。然而,许多研究样本量有限,缺乏外部验证,可能影响研究结果的普遍性。报告方法的可变性可能会影响这些基于ml的方法的可重复性和适用性。结论:ml增强心电图分析有望实现可及且具有成本效益的心脏纤维化检测。然而,在研究设计和外部验证不足方面存在共同的局限性,引起了对研究结果的普遍性和临床适用性的关注。方法的不一致和不完整的报告进一步阻碍了交叉研究的比较。未来的工作可能会受益于前瞻性研究设计、更大、更临床和人口统计学多样化的数据集、先进的ML模型和严格的外部验证。解决这些挑战可以为临床实施基于ml的心电检测心脏纤维化铺平道路,以改善患者预后和卫生保健资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Machine Learning in the Detection of Cardiac Fibrosis in Electrocardiograms: Scoping Review.

Background: Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Cardiac fibrosis impacts the underlying pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases by altering structural integrity and impairing electrical conduction. Identifying cardiac fibrosis is essential for the prognosis and management of cardiovascular disease; however, current diagnostic methods face challenges due to invasiveness, cost, and inaccessibility. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely available and cost-effective for monitoring cardiac electrical activity. While ECG-based methods for inferring fibrosis exist, they are not commonly used due to accuracy limitations and the need for cardiac expertise. However, the ECG shows promise as a target for machine learning (ML) applications in fibrosis detection.

Objective: This study aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the current state of ECG-based ML approaches for cardiac fibrosis detection.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of research in ECG-based ML applications to identify cardiac fibrosis. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and DBLP databases, including publications up to October 2024. Studies were included if they applied ML techniques to detect cardiac fibrosis using ECG or vectorcardiogram data and provided sufficient methodological details and outcome metrics. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data on the ML models used, their performance metrics, study designs, and limitations.

Results: We identified 11 studies evaluating ML approaches for detecting cardiac fibrosis using ECG data. These studies used various ML techniques, including classical (8/11, 73%), ensemble (3/11, 27%), and deep learning models (4/11, 36%). Support vector machines were the most used classical model (6/11, 55%), with the best-performing models of each study achieving accuracies of 77% to 93%. Among deep learning approaches, convolutional neural networks showed promising results, with one study reporting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 when combined with clinical features. Notably, a large-scale convolutional neural network study (n=14,052) achieved an AUC of 0.84 for detecting cardiac fibrosis, outperforming cardiologists (AUC 0.63-0.66). However, many studies had limited sample sizes and lacked external validation, potentially impacting the generalizability of the findings. Variability in reporting methods may affect the reproducibility and applicability of these ML-based approaches.

Conclusions: ML-augmented ECG analysis shows promise for accessible and cost-effective detection of cardiac fibrosis. However, there are common limitations with respect to study design and insufficient external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability and clinical applicability of the findings. Inconsistencies in methodologies and incomplete reporting further impede cross-study comparisons. Future work may benefit from using prospective study designs, larger and more clinically and demographically diverse datasets, advanced ML models, and rigorous external validation. Addressing these challenges could pave the way for the clinical implementation of ML-based ECG detection of cardiac fibrosis to improve patient outcomes and health care resource allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cardio
JMIR Cardio Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信