在普遍检测和治疗时代监测晚期疾病:南非CD4计数检测趋势

Cornelius Nattey, Dorina Onoya, Khumbo Shumba, Dickman Gareta, William Macleod, Matthew P Fox, Adrian Puren, Koleka Mlisana, Jacob Bor
{"title":"在普遍检测和治疗时代监测晚期疾病:南非CD4计数检测趋势","authors":"Cornelius Nattey, Dorina Onoya, Khumbo Shumba, Dickman Gareta, William Macleod, Matthew P Fox, Adrian Puren, Koleka Mlisana, Jacob Bor","doi":"10.1186/s44263-024-00118-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Under South Africa's Universal Test and Treat (UTT) policy, CD4 counts are no longer required to determine HIV treatment eligibility. However, CD4 count at presentation remains an important marker of disease progression. We assessed whether CD4 testing declined in the UTT era and, if so, by how much.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed CD4 count data from the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) National HIV Cohort and TIER.Net database for individuals in HIV care across five South African provinces. \"First CD4 count\" was defined as the first CD4 test recorded for each patient. In TIER.Net, \"date of presentation\" was the earliest date of HIV testing, CD4 measurement, or clinic visit. Trends in first CD4 testing volumes (2004-2018) were analyzed, with interrupted time-series analyses assessing the impact of UTT (September 2016).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data included 5,274,218 (NHLS) and 2,265,557 (TIER.Net) individuals with a first CD4 count. In NHLS, first CD4 counts increased from 47,604 in 2004 to 383,705 in 2010 and then declined. Lower volumes were recorded in TIER.Net. Adjusting for prior trends, first CD4 counts increased slightly after UTT, by 32 individuals/day in NHLS (95% CI: - 6 to 61) and 88 individuals/day in TIER.Net (95% CI: 30 to 148). Among TIER.Net patients, the percentage with a CD4 count decreased by 4.3% (95% CI: - 5.2 to - 3.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no major decline in CD4 testing at presentation following UTT, contrasting findings from resource-constrained settings with greater reliance on external donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring for advanced disease in the universal test and treat era: trends in CD4 count testing in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Cornelius Nattey, Dorina Onoya, Khumbo Shumba, Dickman Gareta, William Macleod, Matthew P Fox, Adrian Puren, Koleka Mlisana, Jacob Bor\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-024-00118-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Under South Africa's Universal Test and Treat (UTT) policy, CD4 counts are no longer required to determine HIV treatment eligibility. However, CD4 count at presentation remains an important marker of disease progression. We assessed whether CD4 testing declined in the UTT era and, if so, by how much.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed CD4 count data from the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) National HIV Cohort and TIER.Net database for individuals in HIV care across five South African provinces. \\\"First CD4 count\\\" was defined as the first CD4 test recorded for each patient. In TIER.Net, \\\"date of presentation\\\" was the earliest date of HIV testing, CD4 measurement, or clinic visit. Trends in first CD4 testing volumes (2004-2018) were analyzed, with interrupted time-series analyses assessing the impact of UTT (September 2016).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data included 5,274,218 (NHLS) and 2,265,557 (TIER.Net) individuals with a first CD4 count. In NHLS, first CD4 counts increased from 47,604 in 2004 to 383,705 in 2010 and then declined. Lower volumes were recorded in TIER.Net. Adjusting for prior trends, first CD4 counts increased slightly after UTT, by 32 individuals/day in NHLS (95% CI: - 6 to 61) and 88 individuals/day in TIER.Net (95% CI: 30 to 148). Among TIER.Net patients, the percentage with a CD4 count decreased by 4.3% (95% CI: - 5.2 to - 3.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no major decline in CD4 testing at presentation following UTT, contrasting findings from resource-constrained settings with greater reliance on external donors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694356/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00118-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00118-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据南非的普遍检测和治疗(UTT)政策,不再需要CD4计数来确定HIV治疗资格。然而,CD4计数仍然是疾病进展的重要标志。我们评估了CD4检测是否在UTT时代下降,如果是,下降了多少。方法:我们分析了来自国家卫生实验室服务(NHLS)国家HIV队列和TIER的CD4计数数据。南非五个省艾滋病毒护理个人的网络数据库。“首次CD4计数”定义为每个患者记录的第一次CD4检测。在层。在Net中,“陈述日期”指的是HIV检测、CD4测量或诊所就诊的最早日期。分析了首次CD4检测量的趋势(2004-2018年),并进行了中断时间序列分析,评估了UTT的影响(2016年9月)。结果:数据包括首次CD4计数的5,274,218 (NHLS)和2,265,557 (TIER.Net)个体。在国家健康服务体系中,CD4细胞计数从2004年的47,604增加到2010年的383,705,然后下降。在TIER.Net中记录了较低的卷。调整之前的趋势后,第一次CD4计数在UTT后略有增加,NHLS中增加32个/天(95% CI: - 6至61),TIER中增加88个/天。净(95% CI: 30 ~ 148)。间层。在患者中,CD4计数的百分比下降了4.3% (95% CI: - 5.2至- 3.0%)。结论:我们发现,在UTT后就诊时CD4检测没有明显下降,这与资源受限、更依赖外部供体的情况形成了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring for advanced disease in the universal test and treat era: trends in CD4 count testing in South Africa.

Background: Under South Africa's Universal Test and Treat (UTT) policy, CD4 counts are no longer required to determine HIV treatment eligibility. However, CD4 count at presentation remains an important marker of disease progression. We assessed whether CD4 testing declined in the UTT era and, if so, by how much.

Methods: We analysed CD4 count data from the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) National HIV Cohort and TIER.Net database for individuals in HIV care across five South African provinces. "First CD4 count" was defined as the first CD4 test recorded for each patient. In TIER.Net, "date of presentation" was the earliest date of HIV testing, CD4 measurement, or clinic visit. Trends in first CD4 testing volumes (2004-2018) were analyzed, with interrupted time-series analyses assessing the impact of UTT (September 2016).

Results: Data included 5,274,218 (NHLS) and 2,265,557 (TIER.Net) individuals with a first CD4 count. In NHLS, first CD4 counts increased from 47,604 in 2004 to 383,705 in 2010 and then declined. Lower volumes were recorded in TIER.Net. Adjusting for prior trends, first CD4 counts increased slightly after UTT, by 32 individuals/day in NHLS (95% CI: - 6 to 61) and 88 individuals/day in TIER.Net (95% CI: 30 to 148). Among TIER.Net patients, the percentage with a CD4 count decreased by 4.3% (95% CI: - 5.2 to - 3.0%).

Conclusions: We found no major decline in CD4 testing at presentation following UTT, contrasting findings from resource-constrained settings with greater reliance on external donors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信