Emiola O Olapade-Olaopa, Miriam Mutebi, Nicholas Cofie, Nancy Dalgarno, Klodiana Kolomitro, Verna Vanderpuye, Fidel Rubagumya, Angela Coderre-Ball, Scott Berry, Nazik Hammad
{"title":"非洲肿瘤学家的专业发展:检查专业发展活动,满意度,障碍和推动因素。","authors":"Emiola O Olapade-Olaopa, Miriam Mutebi, Nicholas Cofie, Nancy Dalgarno, Klodiana Kolomitro, Verna Vanderpuye, Fidel Rubagumya, Angela Coderre-Ball, Scott Berry, Nazik Hammad","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02527-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Africa is currently facing unprecedented growth in its cancer burden. Training an adequate number of skilled physicians is critical to addressing this challenge. We examine African oncology faculty's professional development (PD) activities, associated barriers, enablers, satisfaction levels, and highlight the implications for improving the quality of the oncology faculty workforce in SSA. We surveyed oncology faculty (n = 69) through the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer listserv and conducted semi-structured interviews with nine (n = 9) faculty involved in African oncology training programs to ascertain their views on PD activities including, method of delivery, curriculum development, teaching, learning, and mentorship. Descriptive, inferential, and thematic analytical techniques were used to analyze the data. Ninety-two percent of African oncology faculty have participated in a PD activity and about 34% were dissatisfied with their overall PD. Access to curriculum development opportunities (OR = 2.10, p < 0.05), mentorship opportunities (OR = 3.12, p < 0.001), and a longer duration of practice (OR = 8.66, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with better overall satisfaction with PD. Barriers cited for PD included the competitive nature of PD courses and programs, limited online learning opportunities, poor internet access, time constraints, language barriers, and high costs associated with PD activities. Enablers for improving PD include improving institutional culture of learning and ensuring greater access to local institutional support. African oncologists are faced with many professional development challenges. Addressing these challenges may improve faculty satisfaction levels, remove barriers, and improve expected outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Development Among African Oncologists: Examining Professional Development Activities, Satisfaction Levels, Barriers, and Enablers.\",\"authors\":\"Emiola O Olapade-Olaopa, Miriam Mutebi, Nicholas Cofie, Nancy Dalgarno, Klodiana Kolomitro, Verna Vanderpuye, Fidel Rubagumya, Angela Coderre-Ball, Scott Berry, Nazik Hammad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-024-02527-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Africa is currently facing unprecedented growth in its cancer burden. Training an adequate number of skilled physicians is critical to addressing this challenge. We examine African oncology faculty's professional development (PD) activities, associated barriers, enablers, satisfaction levels, and highlight the implications for improving the quality of the oncology faculty workforce in SSA. We surveyed oncology faculty (n = 69) through the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer listserv and conducted semi-structured interviews with nine (n = 9) faculty involved in African oncology training programs to ascertain their views on PD activities including, method of delivery, curriculum development, teaching, learning, and mentorship. Descriptive, inferential, and thematic analytical techniques were used to analyze the data. Ninety-two percent of African oncology faculty have participated in a PD activity and about 34% were dissatisfied with their overall PD. Access to curriculum development opportunities (OR = 2.10, p < 0.05), mentorship opportunities (OR = 3.12, p < 0.001), and a longer duration of practice (OR = 8.66, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with better overall satisfaction with PD. Barriers cited for PD included the competitive nature of PD courses and programs, limited online learning opportunities, poor internet access, time constraints, language barriers, and high costs associated with PD activities. Enablers for improving PD include improving institutional culture of learning and ensuring greater access to local institutional support. African oncologists are faced with many professional development challenges. Addressing these challenges may improve faculty satisfaction levels, remove barriers, and improve expected outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02527-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02527-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非洲目前面临着癌症负担前所未有的增长。培训足够数量的熟练医生对于应对这一挑战至关重要。我们研究了非洲肿瘤教师的专业发展(PD)活动,相关障碍,使能因素,满意度水平,并强调了提高SSA肿瘤教师队伍质量的意义。我们通过非洲癌症研究和培训组织的listserv调查了肿瘤学教师(n = 69),并对参与非洲肿瘤学培训项目的9名教师(n = 9)进行了半结构化访谈,以确定他们对PD活动的看法,包括交付方法、课程开发、教学、学习和指导。采用描述性、推理性和主题性分析技术对数据进行分析。92%的非洲肿瘤学教师参加了PD活动,约34%的人对他们的总体PD不满意。获得课程发展机会(OR = 2.10, p
Professional Development Among African Oncologists: Examining Professional Development Activities, Satisfaction Levels, Barriers, and Enablers.
Africa is currently facing unprecedented growth in its cancer burden. Training an adequate number of skilled physicians is critical to addressing this challenge. We examine African oncology faculty's professional development (PD) activities, associated barriers, enablers, satisfaction levels, and highlight the implications for improving the quality of the oncology faculty workforce in SSA. We surveyed oncology faculty (n = 69) through the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer listserv and conducted semi-structured interviews with nine (n = 9) faculty involved in African oncology training programs to ascertain their views on PD activities including, method of delivery, curriculum development, teaching, learning, and mentorship. Descriptive, inferential, and thematic analytical techniques were used to analyze the data. Ninety-two percent of African oncology faculty have participated in a PD activity and about 34% were dissatisfied with their overall PD. Access to curriculum development opportunities (OR = 2.10, p < 0.05), mentorship opportunities (OR = 3.12, p < 0.001), and a longer duration of practice (OR = 8.66, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with better overall satisfaction with PD. Barriers cited for PD included the competitive nature of PD courses and programs, limited online learning opportunities, poor internet access, time constraints, language barriers, and high costs associated with PD activities. Enablers for improving PD include improving institutional culture of learning and ensuring greater access to local institutional support. African oncologists are faced with many professional development challenges. Addressing these challenges may improve faculty satisfaction levels, remove barriers, and improve expected outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.