实施新颖的“肿瘤前沿”课程,使四年级医学生参与循证、多学科的肿瘤护理。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Curtis Liu, Cole Ferguson, Mayuri Vaish, Mona Arbab, Radhika Kainthla, Kiran A Kumar, Chul Ahn, Sandra L Hofmann, Samira Syed
{"title":"实施新颖的“肿瘤前沿”课程,使四年级医学生参与循证、多学科的肿瘤护理。","authors":"Curtis Liu, Cole Ferguson, Mayuri Vaish, Mona Arbab, Radhika Kainthla, Kiran A Kumar, Chul Ahn, Sandra L Hofmann, Samira Syed","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02557-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few medical students are exposed to evidence-based, multidisciplinary oncology care, and few studies in oncology education reflect consolidated pre-clinical curricula. We developed a four-week curriculum, \"Frontiers in Neoplasia,\" for fourth-year medical students, which included didactic lectures, interactive site visits, and team-based simulations of tumor boards and clinical trial design. A mixed methods approach was utilized to investigate the course's impact on students' understanding and interest in oncology, involving pre- and post-course responses to Likert-scale and open-ended questions. Quantitative results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, while open-ended course feedback was analyzed using iterative thematic coding analysis. Of the 107 fourth-year medical students enrolled between 2021 and 2024, 94 (88%) completed the pre-survey and 96 (90%) completed the post-survey. Students enjoyed the course, with 96.9% of students reporting they would choose this course again. Quantitative analysis showed a significant increase in students' comfort in evidence-based medicine in oncology (p < .001) and interest in keeping up-to-date with oncology literature (p < .001). Qualitatively, students reported enjoying the multidisciplinary curriculum, diverse hybrid-format learning modalities, and applicability of coursework to their careers. Exposure to our novel oncology curriculum featuring dynamic learning experiences and hybrid format significantly increased medical students' interest and understanding of evidence-based medicine in multidisciplinary comprehensive cancer care. Our findings support the hybrid learning model, which provided flexibility and student engagement. Through this course, we successfully increased interest and understanding of cancer care among final-year medical students, and we believe this program could be applied to other medical schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a Novel \\\"Frontiers in Neoplasia\\\" Curriculum to Engage Fourth-Year Medical Students in Evidence-Based, Multidisciplinary Oncology Care.\",\"authors\":\"Curtis Liu, Cole Ferguson, Mayuri Vaish, Mona Arbab, Radhika Kainthla, Kiran A Kumar, Chul Ahn, Sandra L Hofmann, Samira Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-024-02557-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Few medical students are exposed to evidence-based, multidisciplinary oncology care, and few studies in oncology education reflect consolidated pre-clinical curricula. We developed a four-week curriculum, \\\"Frontiers in Neoplasia,\\\" for fourth-year medical students, which included didactic lectures, interactive site visits, and team-based simulations of tumor boards and clinical trial design. A mixed methods approach was utilized to investigate the course's impact on students' understanding and interest in oncology, involving pre- and post-course responses to Likert-scale and open-ended questions. Quantitative results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, while open-ended course feedback was analyzed using iterative thematic coding analysis. Of the 107 fourth-year medical students enrolled between 2021 and 2024, 94 (88%) completed the pre-survey and 96 (90%) completed the post-survey. Students enjoyed the course, with 96.9% of students reporting they would choose this course again. Quantitative analysis showed a significant increase in students' comfort in evidence-based medicine in oncology (p < .001) and interest in keeping up-to-date with oncology literature (p < .001). Qualitatively, students reported enjoying the multidisciplinary curriculum, diverse hybrid-format learning modalities, and applicability of coursework to their careers. Exposure to our novel oncology curriculum featuring dynamic learning experiences and hybrid format significantly increased medical students' interest and understanding of evidence-based medicine in multidisciplinary comprehensive cancer care. Our findings support the hybrid learning model, which provided flexibility and student engagement. Through this course, we successfully increased interest and understanding of cancer care among final-year medical students, and we believe this program could be applied to other medical schools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02557-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02557-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有医科学生接触到以证据为基础的多学科肿瘤学护理,很少有肿瘤学教育的研究反映了统一的临床前课程。我们为四年级医学生开发了一个为期四周的课程,“肿瘤的前沿”,其中包括教学讲座、互动式实地考察、基于团队的肿瘤委员会模拟和临床试验设计。采用混合方法来调查课程对学生对肿瘤学的理解和兴趣的影响,包括课程前和课程后对李克特量表和开放式问题的反应。定量结果采用Wilcoxon秩和检验分析,开放式课程反馈采用迭代主题编码分析分析。在2021年至2024年期间入学的107名四年级医学生中,94名(88%)完成了预调查,96名(90%)完成了后调查。学生们很喜欢这门课,96.9%的学生表示他们会再次选择这门课。定量分析显示,肿瘤学循证医学专业学生的舒适度显著提高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing a Novel "Frontiers in Neoplasia" Curriculum to Engage Fourth-Year Medical Students in Evidence-Based, Multidisciplinary Oncology Care.

Few medical students are exposed to evidence-based, multidisciplinary oncology care, and few studies in oncology education reflect consolidated pre-clinical curricula. We developed a four-week curriculum, "Frontiers in Neoplasia," for fourth-year medical students, which included didactic lectures, interactive site visits, and team-based simulations of tumor boards and clinical trial design. A mixed methods approach was utilized to investigate the course's impact on students' understanding and interest in oncology, involving pre- and post-course responses to Likert-scale and open-ended questions. Quantitative results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, while open-ended course feedback was analyzed using iterative thematic coding analysis. Of the 107 fourth-year medical students enrolled between 2021 and 2024, 94 (88%) completed the pre-survey and 96 (90%) completed the post-survey. Students enjoyed the course, with 96.9% of students reporting they would choose this course again. Quantitative analysis showed a significant increase in students' comfort in evidence-based medicine in oncology (p < .001) and interest in keeping up-to-date with oncology literature (p < .001). Qualitatively, students reported enjoying the multidisciplinary curriculum, diverse hybrid-format learning modalities, and applicability of coursework to their careers. Exposure to our novel oncology curriculum featuring dynamic learning experiences and hybrid format significantly increased medical students' interest and understanding of evidence-based medicine in multidisciplinary comprehensive cancer care. Our findings support the hybrid learning model, which provided flexibility and student engagement. Through this course, we successfully increased interest and understanding of cancer care among final-year medical students, and we believe this program could be applied to other medical schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信