Yanhua Yue, Yingjie Miao, Yifang Zhou, Yangling Shen, Luo Lu, Fei Wang, Yang Cao, Bai He, Weiying Gu
{"title":"自体造血干细胞移植可影响多发性骨髓瘤患者的预后。","authors":"Yanhua Yue, Yingjie Miao, Yifang Zhou, Yangling Shen, Luo Lu, Fei Wang, Yang Cao, Bai He, Weiying Gu","doi":"10.1080/16078454.2024.2448024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, there is limited understanding regarding the prognostic significance of time to progression (TTP) after first remission in multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 209 patients with MM. These patients were categorized into ≤ 6 months, ≤ 12 months, ≤ 24 months, > 24 months, 6-12 months, and 12-24 months subgroups based on TTP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in ≤ 12 months group exhibited shorter median overall survival (OS) and OS-1 compared to those in ≤ 24 months group (61.73 vs 96.10 months, <i>P</i> = 0.02; 54.00 vs 74.17 months, <i>P</i> = 0.048). ≤ 6 months group exhibited shorter median OS and OS-1 compared to 6-12 months group (33.63 vs 79.60 months, <i>P</i> = 0.022; 19.93 vs 65.17 months, <i>P</i> = 0.015). Patients in 6-12 months group had shorter median OS and OS-1 compared to those in 12-24 months group (79.60 vs 100.43 months, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 65.17 vs 77.17 months, <i>P</i> = 0.012).No significant difference in OS was observed between patients in 12-24 months and > 24 months groups. For patients who experienced progression within 12 or 24 months after remission, undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after progression conferred a median OS and OS-2 advantage over receiving post-progression chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TTP was an independent predictor for OS in patients with MM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with MM who experience earlier disease progression within 12 months after remission have a worse prognosis, and post-progression ASCT can improve their survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13161,"journal":{"name":"Hematology","volume":"30 1","pages":"2448024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to progression predicts outcome of patients with multiple myeloma that can be influenced by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Yanhua Yue, Yingjie Miao, Yifang Zhou, Yangling Shen, Luo Lu, Fei Wang, Yang Cao, Bai He, Weiying Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16078454.2024.2448024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, there is limited understanding regarding the prognostic significance of time to progression (TTP) after first remission in multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 209 patients with MM. These patients were categorized into ≤ 6 months, ≤ 12 months, ≤ 24 months, > 24 months, 6-12 months, and 12-24 months subgroups based on TTP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in ≤ 12 months group exhibited shorter median overall survival (OS) and OS-1 compared to those in ≤ 24 months group (61.73 vs 96.10 months, <i>P</i> = 0.02; 54.00 vs 74.17 months, <i>P</i> = 0.048). ≤ 6 months group exhibited shorter median OS and OS-1 compared to 6-12 months group (33.63 vs 79.60 months, <i>P</i> = 0.022; 19.93 vs 65.17 months, <i>P</i> = 0.015). Patients in 6-12 months group had shorter median OS and OS-1 compared to those in 12-24 months group (79.60 vs 100.43 months, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 65.17 vs 77.17 months, <i>P</i> = 0.012).No significant difference in OS was observed between patients in 12-24 months and > 24 months groups. For patients who experienced progression within 12 or 24 months after remission, undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after progression conferred a median OS and OS-2 advantage over receiving post-progression chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TTP was an independent predictor for OS in patients with MM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with MM who experience earlier disease progression within 12 months after remission have a worse prognosis, and post-progression ASCT can improve their survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2448024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2024.2448024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2024.2448024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目前,对于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)首次缓解后的进展时间(TTP)的预后意义了解有限。方法:回顾性分析209例MM患者的临床资料,根据TTP将患者分为≤6个月、≤12个月、≤24个月、> 24个月、6-12个月和12-24个月亚组。结果:≤12个月组患者的中位总生存期(OS)和OS-1均短于≤24个月组(61.73 vs 96.10个月,P = 0.02;54.00 vs 74.17个月,P = 0.048)。≤6个月组的中位OS和OS-1较6-12个月组短(33.63 vs 79.60个月,P = 0.022;19.93 vs 65.17个月,P = 0.015)。6-12个月组患者的中位OS和OS-1较12-24个月组短(79.60个月vs 100.43个月,P < 0.001;65.17 vs 77.17个月,P = 0.012)。12-24个月组与bb0 -24个月组的OS无显著差异。对于缓解后12或24个月内出现进展的患者,在进展后接受自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)比接受进展后化疗具有中位OS和OS-2优势。多变量分析证实TTP是MM患者OS的独立预测因子。结论:缓解后12个月内病情进展较早的MM患者预后较差,进展后ASCT可改善其生存结局。
Time to progression predicts outcome of patients with multiple myeloma that can be influenced by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Objectives: Currently, there is limited understanding regarding the prognostic significance of time to progression (TTP) after first remission in multiple myeloma (MM).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 209 patients with MM. These patients were categorized into ≤ 6 months, ≤ 12 months, ≤ 24 months, > 24 months, 6-12 months, and 12-24 months subgroups based on TTP.
Results: Patients in ≤ 12 months group exhibited shorter median overall survival (OS) and OS-1 compared to those in ≤ 24 months group (61.73 vs 96.10 months, P = 0.02; 54.00 vs 74.17 months, P = 0.048). ≤ 6 months group exhibited shorter median OS and OS-1 compared to 6-12 months group (33.63 vs 79.60 months, P = 0.022; 19.93 vs 65.17 months, P = 0.015). Patients in 6-12 months group had shorter median OS and OS-1 compared to those in 12-24 months group (79.60 vs 100.43 months, P < 0.001; 65.17 vs 77.17 months, P = 0.012).No significant difference in OS was observed between patients in 12-24 months and > 24 months groups. For patients who experienced progression within 12 or 24 months after remission, undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after progression conferred a median OS and OS-2 advantage over receiving post-progression chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TTP was an independent predictor for OS in patients with MM.
Conclusion: Patients with MM who experience earlier disease progression within 12 months after remission have a worse prognosis, and post-progression ASCT can improve their survival outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Hematology is an international journal publishing original and review articles in the field of general hematology, including oncology, pathology, biology, clinical research and epidemiology. Of the fixed sections, annotations are accepted on any general or scientific field: technical annotations covering current laboratory practice in general hematology, blood transfusion and clinical trials, and current clinical practice reviews the consensus driven areas of care and management.