{"title":"COVID-19接触者追踪技术背景下防护动机理论的延伸与检验——以韩美比较为例","authors":"Soo Jung Hong, Hichang Cho","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study applies protection motivation theory (PMT) to the COVID-19 contact-tracing context by including privacy concerns, collective efficacy, and a mediator (fear of COVID-19) and tests it in the US and South Korea. The study uses a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach and a sample of 418 Americans and 444 South Koreans. According to the results, fear was positively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample but not in the Korean sample. Coping appraisals positively affected adoption intentions in both samples. However, while all types of coping appraisals were significant in the Korean sample, response efficacy was the only significant predictor among US participants. Privacy concerns were negatively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample, but not in the Korean sample. The results indicate that differences exist in the mediating role of fear connecting threat appraisals and adoption intentions in both countries. These findings hold important implications for future studies in AI-based health communication, especially in the areas of privacy management, protection motivation, and diverse cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending and Testing Protection Motivation Theory in the Context of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: A Comparison of South Korea and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Soo Jung Hong, Hichang Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study applies protection motivation theory (PMT) to the COVID-19 contact-tracing context by including privacy concerns, collective efficacy, and a mediator (fear of COVID-19) and tests it in the US and South Korea. The study uses a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach and a sample of 418 Americans and 444 South Koreans. According to the results, fear was positively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample but not in the Korean sample. Coping appraisals positively affected adoption intentions in both samples. However, while all types of coping appraisals were significant in the Korean sample, response efficacy was the only significant predictor among US participants. Privacy concerns were negatively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample, but not in the Korean sample. The results indicate that differences exist in the mediating role of fear connecting threat appraisals and adoption intentions in both countries. These findings hold important implications for future studies in AI-based health communication, especially in the areas of privacy management, protection motivation, and diverse cultural contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extending and Testing Protection Motivation Theory in the Context of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: A Comparison of South Korea and the United States.
This study applies protection motivation theory (PMT) to the COVID-19 contact-tracing context by including privacy concerns, collective efficacy, and a mediator (fear of COVID-19) and tests it in the US and South Korea. The study uses a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach and a sample of 418 Americans and 444 South Koreans. According to the results, fear was positively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample but not in the Korean sample. Coping appraisals positively affected adoption intentions in both samples. However, while all types of coping appraisals were significant in the Korean sample, response efficacy was the only significant predictor among US participants. Privacy concerns were negatively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample, but not in the Korean sample. The results indicate that differences exist in the mediating role of fear connecting threat appraisals and adoption intentions in both countries. These findings hold important implications for future studies in AI-based health communication, especially in the areas of privacy management, protection motivation, and diverse cultural contexts.
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.