COVID-19接触者追踪技术背景下防护动机理论的延伸与检验——以韩美比较为例

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Soo Jung Hong, Hichang Cho
{"title":"COVID-19接触者追踪技术背景下防护动机理论的延伸与检验——以韩美比较为例","authors":"Soo Jung Hong, Hichang Cho","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study applies protection motivation theory (PMT) to the COVID-19 contact-tracing context by including privacy concerns, collective efficacy, and a mediator (fear of COVID-19) and tests it in the US and South Korea. The study uses a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach and a sample of 418 Americans and 444 South Koreans. According to the results, fear was positively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample but not in the Korean sample. Coping appraisals positively affected adoption intentions in both samples. However, while all types of coping appraisals were significant in the Korean sample, response efficacy was the only significant predictor among US participants. Privacy concerns were negatively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample, but not in the Korean sample. The results indicate that differences exist in the mediating role of fear connecting threat appraisals and adoption intentions in both countries. These findings hold important implications for future studies in AI-based health communication, especially in the areas of privacy management, protection motivation, and diverse cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending and Testing Protection Motivation Theory in the Context of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: A Comparison of South Korea and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Soo Jung Hong, Hichang Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study applies protection motivation theory (PMT) to the COVID-19 contact-tracing context by including privacy concerns, collective efficacy, and a mediator (fear of COVID-19) and tests it in the US and South Korea. The study uses a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach and a sample of 418 Americans and 444 South Koreans. According to the results, fear was positively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample but not in the Korean sample. Coping appraisals positively affected adoption intentions in both samples. However, while all types of coping appraisals were significant in the Korean sample, response efficacy was the only significant predictor among US participants. Privacy concerns were negatively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample, but not in the Korean sample. The results indicate that differences exist in the mediating role of fear connecting threat appraisals and adoption intentions in both countries. These findings hold important implications for future studies in AI-based health communication, especially in the areas of privacy management, protection motivation, and diverse cultural contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2447107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将保护动机理论(PMT)应用于COVID-19接触者追踪情境,包括隐私问题、集体效能和中介因素(对COVID-19的恐惧),并在美国和韩国进行了测试。这项研究使用了结构方程模型(SEM)方法,并选取了418名美国人和444名韩国人作为样本。结果显示,在美国样本中,恐惧与收养意愿呈正相关,而在韩国样本中则没有。应对评估正向影响两个样本的收养意愿。然而,尽管所有类型的应对评估在韩国样本中都是显著的,但在美国参与者中,反应效能是唯一显著的预测因子。在美国样本中,隐私问题与采用意图呈负相关,但在韩国样本中没有。结果表明,两国在恐惧连接威胁评估和收养意愿的中介作用上存在差异。这些发现对未来基于人工智能的健康传播研究具有重要意义,特别是在隐私管理、保护动机和不同文化背景方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extending and Testing Protection Motivation Theory in the Context of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: A Comparison of South Korea and the United States.

This study applies protection motivation theory (PMT) to the COVID-19 contact-tracing context by including privacy concerns, collective efficacy, and a mediator (fear of COVID-19) and tests it in the US and South Korea. The study uses a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach and a sample of 418 Americans and 444 South Koreans. According to the results, fear was positively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample but not in the Korean sample. Coping appraisals positively affected adoption intentions in both samples. However, while all types of coping appraisals were significant in the Korean sample, response efficacy was the only significant predictor among US participants. Privacy concerns were negatively associated with adoption intentions in the US sample, but not in the Korean sample. The results indicate that differences exist in the mediating role of fear connecting threat appraisals and adoption intentions in both countries. These findings hold important implications for future studies in AI-based health communication, especially in the areas of privacy management, protection motivation, and diverse cultural contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信