加巴喷丁类药物相关精神疾病:基于2004 - 2023年FAERS数据库的分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jingjing Li, Zhicheng Dai, Zhengwei Zhang, Chen Chen, Xuehui Xiong, Falin Xu
{"title":"加巴喷丁类药物相关精神疾病:基于2004 - 2023年FAERS数据库的分析","authors":"Jingjing Li, Zhicheng Dai, Zhengwei Zhang, Chen Chen, Xuehui Xiong, Falin Xu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2448833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, are commonly used for neuropathic pain but have safety concerns. This study analyzed U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to assess risks of psychiatric disorders as adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from 2004 to 2023 were extracted for disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to evaluate the association between gabapentinoids and psychiatric AEs. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests assessed the incidence and onset profiles, while chi-square examined mortality and hospitalization rates differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 174,321 AE reports, 22.67% involved psychiatric disorders. Gabapentinoids increased psychiatric disorder incidence at SOC level, with events like anxiety and suicidal ideation. Differences in incidence and health outcomes between gabapentin and pregabalin were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a correlation between the use of gabapentinoids and psychiatric disorders. Further research is needed into the mechanisms and prevention strategies for these adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gabapentinoids related psychiatric disorders: an analysis based on the FAERS database from 2004 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Li, Zhicheng Dai, Zhengwei Zhang, Chen Chen, Xuehui Xiong, Falin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2448833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, are commonly used for neuropathic pain but have safety concerns. This study analyzed U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to assess risks of psychiatric disorders as adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from 2004 to 2023 were extracted for disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to evaluate the association between gabapentinoids and psychiatric AEs. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests assessed the incidence and onset profiles, while chi-square examined mortality and hospitalization rates differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 174,321 AE reports, 22.67% involved psychiatric disorders. Gabapentinoids increased psychiatric disorder incidence at SOC level, with events like anxiety and suicidal ideation. Differences in incidence and health outcomes between gabapentin and pregabalin were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a correlation between the use of gabapentinoids and psychiatric disorders. Further research is needed into the mechanisms and prevention strategies for these adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2448833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2448833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加巴喷丁类药物,包括加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林,通常用于神经性疼痛,但存在安全性问题。本研究分析了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,以评估精神疾病作为不良反应的风险。研究设计和方法:提取2004 - 2023年的数据,采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)进行歧化分析,评估加巴喷丁类药物与精神病学不良事件之间的关系。Kaplan-Meier检验和log-rank检验评估了发病率和发病情况,而卡方检验了死亡率和住院率的差异。结果:在174,321例AE报告中,22.67%涉及精神障碍。加巴喷丁类药物增加了SOC水平的精神障碍发生率,包括焦虑和自杀意念等事件。加巴喷丁与普瑞巴林在发病率和健康结局上存在显著差异(p)。结论:加巴喷丁类药物的使用与精神疾病存在相关性。需要进一步研究这些不良反应的机制和预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gabapentinoids related psychiatric disorders: an analysis based on the FAERS database from 2004 to 2023.

Background: Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, are commonly used for neuropathic pain but have safety concerns. This study analyzed U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to assess risks of psychiatric disorders as adverse effects.

Research design and methods: Data from 2004 to 2023 were extracted for disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to evaluate the association between gabapentinoids and psychiatric AEs. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests assessed the incidence and onset profiles, while chi-square examined mortality and hospitalization rates differences.

Results: Of 174,321 AE reports, 22.67% involved psychiatric disorders. Gabapentinoids increased psychiatric disorder incidence at SOC level, with events like anxiety and suicidal ideation. Differences in incidence and health outcomes between gabapentin and pregabalin were significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: There is a correlation between the use of gabapentinoids and psychiatric disorders. Further research is needed into the mechanisms and prevention strategies for these adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信