抗生素预防Child-Pugh A肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者感染:一项开放标签随机对照试验

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Anany Gupta, Samagra Agarwal, Sanchit Sharma, Srikanth Gopi, Deepak Gunjan, Anoop Saraya
{"title":"抗生素预防Child-Pugh A肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者感染:一项开放标签随机对照试验","authors":"Anany Gupta, Samagra Agarwal, Sanchit Sharma, Srikanth Gopi, Deepak Gunjan, Anoop Saraya","doi":"10.1007/s12072-024-10767-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Although beneficial in reducing the risk of bacterial infections in patients with advanced decompensated cirrhosis after upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed, the utility of prophylactic antibiotics in those with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis is not known. We studied if prophylactic antibiotics can be withheld in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, open-label randomised-controlled-trial with non-inferiority design. Patients of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with upper-GI bleed and hemodynamic stability were randomised to receive either no prophylactic antibiotics (test-group) or ceftriaxone [standard of care (SOC)] for 72 h alongside standard medical management. The primary outcome was infection at day-5 in both arms. Secondary outcomes included failure to control bleed, mortality at day-5, and at 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eligible patients (n = 180; mean age 45.1 ± 13.1 years, 76.9% males; median MELDNa 9 [interquartile-range: 7-12]) of predominant non-viral etiology (alcohol: 43.4%; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: 21.7%) were randomised, of whom outcomes could be reliably assessed for 172 and 140 patients at 5-day and 6-week follow-up, respectively. Rate of day-5 infections in test-group [7.0% (95% CI 2.8-15.1%)] was non-inferior to SOC arm [11.6% (95% CI 6.02-20.8%); absolute risk difference: -4.7% (95% CI -13.3% to 4.0%; non-inferior at 10% margin)]. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis following post-bleed ascites was the most common site of infection in both groups (10/16; 66.7%). Rates of failure to control bleed [0% vs 4.9; absolute-risk-difference: -4.6% (95% CI -9.1% to 0.2%)], day-5 mortality [0% vs 2.5%; absolute-risk-difference: -2.3% (-5.5% to 0.9%)], and 6-week mortality [1.4% vs 2.5%; absolute-risk-difference: -1.6% (-6.5% to 3.2%)] were comparable in both arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with hemodynamic stability, withholding prophylactic antibiotics after upper GI bleed was not associated with increased risk of post-bleed infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with upper gastrointestinal bleed: an open label randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anany Gupta, Samagra Agarwal, Sanchit Sharma, Srikanth Gopi, Deepak Gunjan, Anoop Saraya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12072-024-10767-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Although beneficial in reducing the risk of bacterial infections in patients with advanced decompensated cirrhosis after upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed, the utility of prophylactic antibiotics in those with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis is not known. We studied if prophylactic antibiotics can be withheld in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, open-label randomised-controlled-trial with non-inferiority design. Patients of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with upper-GI bleed and hemodynamic stability were randomised to receive either no prophylactic antibiotics (test-group) or ceftriaxone [standard of care (SOC)] for 72 h alongside standard medical management. The primary outcome was infection at day-5 in both arms. Secondary outcomes included failure to control bleed, mortality at day-5, and at 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eligible patients (n = 180; mean age 45.1 ± 13.1 years, 76.9% males; median MELDNa 9 [interquartile-range: 7-12]) of predominant non-viral etiology (alcohol: 43.4%; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: 21.7%) were randomised, of whom outcomes could be reliably assessed for 172 and 140 patients at 5-day and 6-week follow-up, respectively. Rate of day-5 infections in test-group [7.0% (95% CI 2.8-15.1%)] was non-inferior to SOC arm [11.6% (95% CI 6.02-20.8%); absolute risk difference: -4.7% (95% CI -13.3% to 4.0%; non-inferior at 10% margin)]. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis following post-bleed ascites was the most common site of infection in both groups (10/16; 66.7%). Rates of failure to control bleed [0% vs 4.9; absolute-risk-difference: -4.6% (95% CI -9.1% to 0.2%)], day-5 mortality [0% vs 2.5%; absolute-risk-difference: -2.3% (-5.5% to 0.9%)], and 6-week mortality [1.4% vs 2.5%; absolute-risk-difference: -1.6% (-6.5% to 3.2%)] were comparable in both arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with hemodynamic stability, withholding prophylactic antibiotics after upper GI bleed was not associated with increased risk of post-bleed infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10767-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10767-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然在上消化道(GI)出血后晚期失代偿性肝硬化患者中,预防性抗生素有利于降低细菌感染的风险,但预防性抗生素在Child-Pugh A肝硬化患者中的应用尚不清楚。我们研究了在这个队列中是否可以不使用预防性抗生素。方法:这是一项单中心、开放标签、非劣效设计的随机对照试验。Child-Pugh A肝硬化合并上消化道出血和血流动力学稳定的患者被随机分为两组,一组接受无预防性抗生素治疗(试验组),另一组接受头孢曲松[标准护理(SOC)]治疗72小时,同时接受标准医疗管理。主要终点是第5天两组的感染。次要结局包括出血控制失败、第5天和第6周死亡。结果:符合条件的患者(n = 180;平均年龄45.1±13.1岁,男性76.9%;主要非病毒性病因的中位MELDNa 9[四分位数范围:7-12])(酒精:43.4%;非酒精性脂肪性肝炎:21.7%)被随机分组,其中172例和140例患者分别在5天和6周的随访中得到可靠的结果评估。试验组第5天感染率[7.0% (95% CI 2.8 ~ 15.1%)]不低于SOC组[11.6% (95% CI 6.02 ~ 20.8%)];绝对风险差:-4.7% (95% CI -13.3% ~ 4.0%;不劣于10%的利润率)]。出血性腹水后自发性细菌性腹膜炎是两组最常见的感染部位(10/16;66.7%)。出血控制失败率[0% vs 4.9;绝对风险差异:-4.6% (95% CI -9.1%至0.2%),第5天死亡率[0%对2.5%;绝对风险差异:-2.3%(-5.5%至0.9%)]和6周死亡率[1.4%对2.5%;绝对风险差异:-1.6%(-6.5%至3.2%)]在两组中具有可比性。结论:在血流动力学稳定的Child-Pugh A肝硬化患者中,上消化道出血后停用预防性抗生素与出血后感染风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with upper gastrointestinal bleed: an open label randomised controlled trial.

Background and aims: Although beneficial in reducing the risk of bacterial infections in patients with advanced decompensated cirrhosis after upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed, the utility of prophylactic antibiotics in those with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis is not known. We studied if prophylactic antibiotics can be withheld in this cohort.

Methods: This was a single-centre, open-label randomised-controlled-trial with non-inferiority design. Patients of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with upper-GI bleed and hemodynamic stability were randomised to receive either no prophylactic antibiotics (test-group) or ceftriaxone [standard of care (SOC)] for 72 h alongside standard medical management. The primary outcome was infection at day-5 in both arms. Secondary outcomes included failure to control bleed, mortality at day-5, and at 6 weeks.

Results: Eligible patients (n = 180; mean age 45.1 ± 13.1 years, 76.9% males; median MELDNa 9 [interquartile-range: 7-12]) of predominant non-viral etiology (alcohol: 43.4%; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: 21.7%) were randomised, of whom outcomes could be reliably assessed for 172 and 140 patients at 5-day and 6-week follow-up, respectively. Rate of day-5 infections in test-group [7.0% (95% CI 2.8-15.1%)] was non-inferior to SOC arm [11.6% (95% CI 6.02-20.8%); absolute risk difference: -4.7% (95% CI -13.3% to 4.0%; non-inferior at 10% margin)]. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis following post-bleed ascites was the most common site of infection in both groups (10/16; 66.7%). Rates of failure to control bleed [0% vs 4.9; absolute-risk-difference: -4.6% (95% CI -9.1% to 0.2%)], day-5 mortality [0% vs 2.5%; absolute-risk-difference: -2.3% (-5.5% to 0.9%)], and 6-week mortality [1.4% vs 2.5%; absolute-risk-difference: -1.6% (-6.5% to 3.2%)] were comparable in both arms.

Conclusion: Among patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with hemodynamic stability, withholding prophylactic antibiotics after upper GI bleed was not associated with increased risk of post-bleed infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信