医疗参考工具和药物推广:缠结的历史。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-01959
Andrew S Lea, Jai Krishan Khurana
{"title":"医疗参考工具和药物推广:缠结的历史。","authors":"Andrew S Lea, Jai Krishan Khurana","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-01959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reference tools are often uncritically accepted as balanced, objective, definitive, and evidence-based guides to medical knowledge. Yet for centuries textbooks and manuals have been entangled in various ways with industry interests. This essay shows how reference tools have served as sites of pharmaceutical promotion. Focusing on 2 reference tools, <i>The Merck Manual</i> and <i>The Management of Pain</i>, the authors sketch the complex and dynamic ways that Merck & Company and Purdue Frederick Company used medical reference texts to advance their market interests over the 20th century. Merck leveraged its eponymous <i>Manual</i> initially to promote its own products and later to elevate its brand name amid a public relations storm. Purdue's influence on pain medicine textbooks and prescribing manuals was less direct: By subsidizing the creation of pain medicine's flagship textbook and cultivating goodwill from key leaders, the company shaped the direction of many of the field's reference tools. As reference tools evolve over the 21st century, combining in new ways with machine-learning models, a historical perspective alerts us to the enduring influence, and vulnerabilities, of these aids to thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Reference Tools and Pharmaceutical Promotion: A History of Entanglement.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S Lea, Jai Krishan Khurana\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-01959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reference tools are often uncritically accepted as balanced, objective, definitive, and evidence-based guides to medical knowledge. Yet for centuries textbooks and manuals have been entangled in various ways with industry interests. This essay shows how reference tools have served as sites of pharmaceutical promotion. Focusing on 2 reference tools, <i>The Merck Manual</i> and <i>The Management of Pain</i>, the authors sketch the complex and dynamic ways that Merck & Company and Purdue Frederick Company used medical reference texts to advance their market interests over the 20th century. Merck leveraged its eponymous <i>Manual</i> initially to promote its own products and later to elevate its brand name amid a public relations storm. Purdue's influence on pain medicine textbooks and prescribing manuals was less direct: By subsidizing the creation of pain medicine's flagship textbook and cultivating goodwill from key leaders, the company shaped the direction of many of the field's reference tools. As reference tools evolve over the 21st century, combining in new ways with machine-learning models, a historical perspective alerts us to the enduring influence, and vulnerabilities, of these aids to thought.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"279-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01959\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参考工具通常被不加批判地接受为平衡的、客观的、确定的和基于证据的医学知识指南。然而,几个世纪以来,教科书和手册一直以各种方式与行业利益纠缠在一起。这篇文章展示了参考工具如何作为药物推广的场所。专注于两个参考工具,默克手册和疼痛的管理,作者概述了复杂和动态的方式,默克公司和普渡弗雷德里克公司使用医学参考文本推进他们的市场利益在20世纪。默克公司最初利用其同名手册来推广自己的产品,后来在一场公关风暴中提升了自己的品牌知名度。普渡大学对疼痛医学教科书和处方手册的影响没有那么直接:通过资助疼痛医学旗舰教科书的编写,并培养关键领导者的好感,该公司塑造了该领域许多参考工具的发展方向。随着参考工具在21世纪的发展,以新的方式与机器学习模型相结合,历史的视角提醒我们,这些思维辅助工具的持久影响和脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Reference Tools and Pharmaceutical Promotion: A History of Entanglement.

Reference tools are often uncritically accepted as balanced, objective, definitive, and evidence-based guides to medical knowledge. Yet for centuries textbooks and manuals have been entangled in various ways with industry interests. This essay shows how reference tools have served as sites of pharmaceutical promotion. Focusing on 2 reference tools, The Merck Manual and The Management of Pain, the authors sketch the complex and dynamic ways that Merck & Company and Purdue Frederick Company used medical reference texts to advance their market interests over the 20th century. Merck leveraged its eponymous Manual initially to promote its own products and later to elevate its brand name amid a public relations storm. Purdue's influence on pain medicine textbooks and prescribing manuals was less direct: By subsidizing the creation of pain medicine's flagship textbook and cultivating goodwill from key leaders, the company shaped the direction of many of the field's reference tools. As reference tools evolve over the 21st century, combining in new ways with machine-learning models, a historical perspective alerts us to the enduring influence, and vulnerabilities, of these aids to thought.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信