将经济证据纳入临床指南:美国医师学会临床指南委员会的框架。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149
Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice, Carolyn J Crandall, Lauri A Hicks, Timothy J Wilt, Ethan M Balk, Thomas G Cooney, J Thomas Cross, Nick Fitterman, Johanna Lewis, Jennifer S Lin, Amy Linsky, Michael Maroto, Matthew C Miller, Adam J Obley, Paul Shekelle, Janice E Tufte, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Curtis S Harrod, Jennifer Yost, Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Carolyn J Crandall, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice
{"title":"将经济证据纳入临床指南:美国医师学会临床指南委员会的框架。","authors":"Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice, Carolyn J Crandall, Lauri A Hicks, Timothy J Wilt, Ethan M Balk, Thomas G Cooney, J Thomas Cross, Nick Fitterman, Johanna Lewis, Jennifer S Lin, Amy Linsky, Michael Maroto, Matthew C Miller, Adam J Obley, Paul Shekelle, Janice E Tufte, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Curtis S Harrod, Jennifer Yost, Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Carolyn J Crandall, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recognition of accelerating health care spending and alignment with the American College of Physicians (ACP) principles of promoting high-value care, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) developed a framework to standardize its approach to identifying, appraising, and considering economic evidence in the development of ACP clinical guidelines. This article presents the CGC's process for incorporating economic evidence, which encompasses cost-effectiveness analyses, economic outcomes in randomized controlled trials, and resource utilization (intervention cost) data. Economic evidence is one component of ACP recommendations. The CGC first and foremost assesses the certainty of evidence for clinical net benefit of interventions; it then considers patient values and preferences, and only then considers economic evidence to develop recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"241-248"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating Economic Evidence in Clinical Guidelines: A Framework From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice, Carolyn J Crandall, Lauri A Hicks, Timothy J Wilt, Ethan M Balk, Thomas G Cooney, J Thomas Cross, Nick Fitterman, Johanna Lewis, Jennifer S Lin, Amy Linsky, Michael Maroto, Matthew C Miller, Adam J Obley, Paul Shekelle, Janice E Tufte, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Curtis S Harrod, Jennifer Yost, Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Carolyn J Crandall, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recognition of accelerating health care spending and alignment with the American College of Physicians (ACP) principles of promoting high-value care, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) developed a framework to standardize its approach to identifying, appraising, and considering economic evidence in the development of ACP clinical guidelines. This article presents the CGC's process for incorporating economic evidence, which encompasses cost-effectiveness analyses, economic outcomes in randomized controlled trials, and resource utilization (intervention cost) data. Economic evidence is one component of ACP recommendations. The CGC first and foremost assesses the certainty of evidence for clinical net benefit of interventions; it then considers patient values and preferences, and only then considers economic evidence to develop recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"241-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认识到医疗保健支出的加速以及与美国医师学会(ACP)促进高价值护理的原则保持一致,ACP临床指南委员会(CGC)制定了一个框架,以规范其在ACP临床指南制定过程中识别、评估和考虑经济证据的方法。本文介绍了CGC纳入经济证据的过程,包括成本效益分析、随机对照试验的经济结果和资源利用(干预成本)数据。经济证据是ACP建议的一个组成部分。CGC首先评估干预措施临床净收益证据的确定性;然后,它会考虑患者的价值观和偏好,然后才会考虑经济证据来制定建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating Economic Evidence in Clinical Guidelines: A Framework From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.

In recognition of accelerating health care spending and alignment with the American College of Physicians (ACP) principles of promoting high-value care, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) developed a framework to standardize its approach to identifying, appraising, and considering economic evidence in the development of ACP clinical guidelines. This article presents the CGC's process for incorporating economic evidence, which encompasses cost-effectiveness analyses, economic outcomes in randomized controlled trials, and resource utilization (intervention cost) data. Economic evidence is one component of ACP recommendations. The CGC first and foremost assesses the certainty of evidence for clinical net benefit of interventions; it then considers patient values and preferences, and only then considers economic evidence to develop recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信