{"title":"基于生理学的药代动力学模型在EMA新药审批中的当前应用。","authors":"Polly Paul, Pieter J Colin, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Carolien Versantvoort, Efthymios Manolis, Kevin Blake","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models are routinely used in drug development and therefore appear frequently in marketing authorization applications (MAAs) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For a model to be a key source of evidence for a regulatory decision, it must be considered qualified for the intended use. Advice on the data expected to allow qualification of a PBPK model or platform is provided in the EMA Guideline on the reporting of PBPK modeling and simulation. The present study is an EMA review of the use of PBPK models in submitted MAAs in 2022 and 2023 focussing on the concept of qualification and the reasons why models were not considered qualified. A review of the 95 MAAs with a \"full\" legal basis approved during these years showed that 25 of them contained PBPK modeling. There were 65 proposed general areas of intended use for PBPK modeling identified across the applications, with the most common being a prediction of drug-drug interactions with enzymes or transporters (69%). Finally, this review showed that most of the models submitted in applications to EMA were not considered qualified for the intended use(s). The reasons identified for this are reported and the need for further EMA guidance, particularly around requirements for qualification of PBPK models, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic modeling in New Medicinal Product Approvals at EMA.\",\"authors\":\"Polly Paul, Pieter J Colin, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Carolien Versantvoort, Efthymios Manolis, Kevin Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models are routinely used in drug development and therefore appear frequently in marketing authorization applications (MAAs) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For a model to be a key source of evidence for a regulatory decision, it must be considered qualified for the intended use. Advice on the data expected to allow qualification of a PBPK model or platform is provided in the EMA Guideline on the reporting of PBPK modeling and simulation. The present study is an EMA review of the use of PBPK models in submitted MAAs in 2022 and 2023 focussing on the concept of qualification and the reasons why models were not considered qualified. A review of the 95 MAAs with a \\\"full\\\" legal basis approved during these years showed that 25 of them contained PBPK modeling. There were 65 proposed general areas of intended use for PBPK modeling identified across the applications, with the most common being a prediction of drug-drug interactions with enzymes or transporters (69%). Finally, this review showed that most of the models submitted in applications to EMA were not considered qualified for the intended use(s). The reasons identified for this are reported and the need for further EMA guidance, particularly around requirements for qualification of PBPK models, are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于生理学的药物代谢动力学 (PBPK) 模型通常用于药物开发,因此经常出现在向欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 提交的上市许可申请 (MAA) 中。要使模型成为监管决策的关键证据来源,就必须认为该模型符合预期用途。EMA 关于 PBPK 建模和模拟报告的指导原则中提供了关于 PBPK 模型或平台合格性预期数据的建议。本研究是 EMA 对 2022 年和 2023 年提交的 MAA 中 PBPK 模型的使用情况进行的审查,重点是资格鉴定的概念以及模型未被视为合格的原因。对这两年批准的 95 项具有 "充分 "法律依据的 MAA 的审查表明,其中 25 项包含 PBPK 模型。在这些申请中,有 65 个提出了 PBPK 建模的一般预期用途领域,其中最常见的是预测药物与酶或转运体的相互作用(69%)。最后,本次审查表明,在提交给 EMA 的申请中,大多数模型被认为不符合预期用途。报告中指出了造成这种情况的原因,并讨论了 EMA 进一步提供指导的必要性,特别是对 PBPK 模型资格的要求。
Current Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic modeling in New Medicinal Product Approvals at EMA.
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models are routinely used in drug development and therefore appear frequently in marketing authorization applications (MAAs) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For a model to be a key source of evidence for a regulatory decision, it must be considered qualified for the intended use. Advice on the data expected to allow qualification of a PBPK model or platform is provided in the EMA Guideline on the reporting of PBPK modeling and simulation. The present study is an EMA review of the use of PBPK models in submitted MAAs in 2022 and 2023 focussing on the concept of qualification and the reasons why models were not considered qualified. A review of the 95 MAAs with a "full" legal basis approved during these years showed that 25 of them contained PBPK modeling. There were 65 proposed general areas of intended use for PBPK modeling identified across the applications, with the most common being a prediction of drug-drug interactions with enzymes or transporters (69%). Finally, this review showed that most of the models submitted in applications to EMA were not considered qualified for the intended use(s). The reasons identified for this are reported and the need for further EMA guidance, particularly around requirements for qualification of PBPK models, are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.