{"title":"解释和对抗肥胖的整体方法","authors":"Tobias Anker Stripp, Per Torp Sangild","doi":"10.1038/s42255-024-01197-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Obesity is a global health problem related to the Western lifestyle. Lifestyle is biological but also non-biological, and so requires more than studies of diet, exercise and mechanisms of cellular metabolism. The recent Perspective by Magkos et al.<sup>1</sup> provides an excellent overview of leading causal models in metabolic obesity research and new areas for future exploration. Specifically, they contrast the energy balance model (EBM) and the carbohydrate–insulin model (CIM). The latter can be considered a version of the fuel partitioning model (FPM)<sup>2</sup>. We draw attention to the need for holistic, interdisciplinary approaches, with potential new ontological perspectives, to explain and combat obesity beyond what is currently considered within said existing biological models. The World Health Organization’s 1946 definition of health as “… complete physical, mental, and social well-being” points to such a holistic understanding of health. Over the past decades, spirituality has been suggested as a necessary fourth dimension of human health<sup>3</sup>. Although Magkos et al. include “psychosocial” among “other factors” in their model, they hardly discuss mental or social factors and leave out spirituality.</p><p>Drawing on experience from palliative care, spirituality is widely defined as the “dynamic and intrinsic aspect of humanity through which persons seek ultimate meaning, purpose, and transcendence, and experience relationship to self, family, others, community, society, nature, and the significant or sacred. Spirituality is expressed through beliefs, values, traditions, and practices”<sup>5</sup>. Recent epidemiological studies show robust associations between spirituality and health outcomes<sup>6</sup>. Such relations are challenging to explain entirely by altered metabolism or psychosocial factors, and the observed effects may be partly determined by independent effects of spirituality<sup>7</sup>. The majority of the global population expresses faith convictions in some form (spiritual, religious, secular and/or existential)<sup>6,7,8</sup>. Spiritual needs and expressions are common, including in modern, secular cultures<sup>8</sup>. Hence, personal or communal spirituality may influence how people understand and relate to their body, food and eating<sup>9</sup>. Beyond psychosocial issues, existential anxiety may stimulate appetite and fat storage, in line with conventional EBM and FPM theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":19038,"journal":{"name":"Nature metabolism","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holistic approaches to explain and combat obesity\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Anker Stripp, Per Torp Sangild\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s42255-024-01197-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Obesity is a global health problem related to the Western lifestyle. Lifestyle is biological but also non-biological, and so requires more than studies of diet, exercise and mechanisms of cellular metabolism. The recent Perspective by Magkos et al.<sup>1</sup> provides an excellent overview of leading causal models in metabolic obesity research and new areas for future exploration. Specifically, they contrast the energy balance model (EBM) and the carbohydrate–insulin model (CIM). The latter can be considered a version of the fuel partitioning model (FPM)<sup>2</sup>. We draw attention to the need for holistic, interdisciplinary approaches, with potential new ontological perspectives, to explain and combat obesity beyond what is currently considered within said existing biological models. The World Health Organization’s 1946 definition of health as “… complete physical, mental, and social well-being” points to such a holistic understanding of health. Over the past decades, spirituality has been suggested as a necessary fourth dimension of human health<sup>3</sup>. Although Magkos et al. include “psychosocial” among “other factors” in their model, they hardly discuss mental or social factors and leave out spirituality.</p><p>Drawing on experience from palliative care, spirituality is widely defined as the “dynamic and intrinsic aspect of humanity through which persons seek ultimate meaning, purpose, and transcendence, and experience relationship to self, family, others, community, society, nature, and the significant or sacred. Spirituality is expressed through beliefs, values, traditions, and practices”<sup>5</sup>. Recent epidemiological studies show robust associations between spirituality and health outcomes<sup>6</sup>. Such relations are challenging to explain entirely by altered metabolism or psychosocial factors, and the observed effects may be partly determined by independent effects of spirituality<sup>7</sup>. The majority of the global population expresses faith convictions in some form (spiritual, religious, secular and/or existential)<sup>6,7,8</sup>. Spiritual needs and expressions are common, including in modern, secular cultures<sup>8</sup>. Hence, personal or communal spirituality may influence how people understand and relate to their body, food and eating<sup>9</sup>. Beyond psychosocial issues, existential anxiety may stimulate appetite and fat storage, in line with conventional EBM and FPM theories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature metabolism\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01197-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01197-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Obesity is a global health problem related to the Western lifestyle. Lifestyle is biological but also non-biological, and so requires more than studies of diet, exercise and mechanisms of cellular metabolism. The recent Perspective by Magkos et al.1 provides an excellent overview of leading causal models in metabolic obesity research and new areas for future exploration. Specifically, they contrast the energy balance model (EBM) and the carbohydrate–insulin model (CIM). The latter can be considered a version of the fuel partitioning model (FPM)2. We draw attention to the need for holistic, interdisciplinary approaches, with potential new ontological perspectives, to explain and combat obesity beyond what is currently considered within said existing biological models. The World Health Organization’s 1946 definition of health as “… complete physical, mental, and social well-being” points to such a holistic understanding of health. Over the past decades, spirituality has been suggested as a necessary fourth dimension of human health3. Although Magkos et al. include “psychosocial” among “other factors” in their model, they hardly discuss mental or social factors and leave out spirituality.
Drawing on experience from palliative care, spirituality is widely defined as the “dynamic and intrinsic aspect of humanity through which persons seek ultimate meaning, purpose, and transcendence, and experience relationship to self, family, others, community, society, nature, and the significant or sacred. Spirituality is expressed through beliefs, values, traditions, and practices”5. Recent epidemiological studies show robust associations between spirituality and health outcomes6. Such relations are challenging to explain entirely by altered metabolism or psychosocial factors, and the observed effects may be partly determined by independent effects of spirituality7. The majority of the global population expresses faith convictions in some form (spiritual, religious, secular and/or existential)6,7,8. Spiritual needs and expressions are common, including in modern, secular cultures8. Hence, personal or communal spirituality may influence how people understand and relate to their body, food and eating9. Beyond psychosocial issues, existential anxiety may stimulate appetite and fat storage, in line with conventional EBM and FPM theories.
期刊介绍:
Nature Metabolism is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers a broad range of topics in metabolism research. It aims to advance the understanding of metabolic and homeostatic processes at a cellular and physiological level. The journal publishes research from various fields, including fundamental cell biology, basic biomedical and translational research, and integrative physiology. It focuses on how cellular metabolism affects cellular function, the physiology and homeostasis of organs and tissues, and the regulation of organismal energy homeostasis. It also investigates the molecular pathophysiology of metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity, as well as their treatment. Nature Metabolism follows the standards of other Nature-branded journals, with a dedicated team of professional editors, rigorous peer-review process, high standards of copy-editing and production, swift publication, and editorial independence. The journal has a high impact factor, has a certain influence in the international area, and is deeply concerned and cited by the majority of scholars.