Kee D Kim, Katherine A Curran, Richard L Price, Safdar Khan
{"title":"Mobi-C人工颈椎间盘的器械概况:安全性和有效性综述","authors":"Kee D Kim, Katherine A Curran, Richard L Price, Safdar Khan","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2449504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Mobi-C Cervical Disc Replacement is a motion preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in properly indicated patients. In 2013, Mobi-C became the first cervical disc in the United States approved to treat more than one level of the cervical spine. The FDA determined Mobi-C to be statistically superior to fusion at two levels, based on the primary endpoint of a prospective, concurrently controlled and randomized multicenter clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The history of Mobi-C and cervical disc arthroplasty is discussed. The unique biomechanics and structure of Mobi-C, the clinical results, the long term follow-up, the disc's biomechanics, and cost-effectiveness research are described. The competitive landscape is overviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The evidence in this article supports the use of the Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis as a viable alternative to fusion surgery in selected patients. Mobi-C has a relatively long track record compared to most other cervical disc prostheses. Thus far, Mobi-C is a very good option for preserving cervical motion based on long term follow-up, for achieving favorable clinical outcomes, and for maintaining patient safety. The Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis is generally viewed positively, supported by clinical experience and research findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Device profile of the Mobi-C artificial cervical disc: an overview of its safety and efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Kee D Kim, Katherine A Curran, Richard L Price, Safdar Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2024.2449504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Mobi-C Cervical Disc Replacement is a motion preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in properly indicated patients. In 2013, Mobi-C became the first cervical disc in the United States approved to treat more than one level of the cervical spine. The FDA determined Mobi-C to be statistically superior to fusion at two levels, based on the primary endpoint of a prospective, concurrently controlled and randomized multicenter clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The history of Mobi-C and cervical disc arthroplasty is discussed. The unique biomechanics and structure of Mobi-C, the clinical results, the long term follow-up, the disc's biomechanics, and cost-effectiveness research are described. The competitive landscape is overviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The evidence in this article supports the use of the Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis as a viable alternative to fusion surgery in selected patients. Mobi-C has a relatively long track record compared to most other cervical disc prostheses. Thus far, Mobi-C is a very good option for preserving cervical motion based on long term follow-up, for achieving favorable clinical outcomes, and for maintaining patient safety. The Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis is generally viewed positively, supported by clinical experience and research findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2449504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2449504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Device profile of the Mobi-C artificial cervical disc: an overview of its safety and efficacy.
Introduction: The Mobi-C Cervical Disc Replacement is a motion preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in properly indicated patients. In 2013, Mobi-C became the first cervical disc in the United States approved to treat more than one level of the cervical spine. The FDA determined Mobi-C to be statistically superior to fusion at two levels, based on the primary endpoint of a prospective, concurrently controlled and randomized multicenter clinical trial.
Areas covered: The history of Mobi-C and cervical disc arthroplasty is discussed. The unique biomechanics and structure of Mobi-C, the clinical results, the long term follow-up, the disc's biomechanics, and cost-effectiveness research are described. The competitive landscape is overviewed.
Expert opinion: The evidence in this article supports the use of the Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis as a viable alternative to fusion surgery in selected patients. Mobi-C has a relatively long track record compared to most other cervical disc prostheses. Thus far, Mobi-C is a very good option for preserving cervical motion based on long term follow-up, for achieving favorable clinical outcomes, and for maintaining patient safety. The Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis is generally viewed positively, supported by clinical experience and research findings.