什么是“非医生义务”?调查研究探讨他们对麻醉学住院医师教育的影响并建立一个概念框架。

IF 0.5 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A&A practice Pub Date : 2025-01-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001885
Nicholas R Cormier, Daniel A Kinney, Robert R Gaiser
{"title":"什么是“非医生义务”?调查研究探讨他们对麻醉学住院医师教育的影响并建立一个概念框架。","authors":"Nicholas R Cormier, Daniel A Kinney, Robert R Gaiser","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education defines \"nonphysician obligations\" as \"duties performed by nursing and allied health professionals, transport services, or clerical staff.\" How anesthesiology trainees understand the concept of \"nonphysician obligations\" and are impacted by these obligations is incompletely understood. The objective of the study was to identify how anesthesiology trainees define \"nonphysician obligations,\" which obligations impact trainee education, and what attitudes trainees hold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was administered to Anesthesiology residents (N = 86) at a large academic hospital in 2023. Respondents defined \"nonphysician obligations,\" listed obligations that impacted their education, and indicated the frequency of these obligations. Respondents scored their agreement with statements appraising attitudes toward the clarity and consistency of the term and classified anesthesiology tasks as physician/nonphysician. The authors developed a conceptual framework defining \"nonphysician obligations\" using grounded theory and categorized the participants' responses based on this framework. Tallies assessed which obligations and attitudes were most prominent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 82.6% (n = 71). Respondents defined nonphysician obligations with either a patient-centered or physician-centered framework. Tasks spanning nursing, patient transport, anesthesia technicians, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and care coordinators impacted education most. Outlier definitions and obligations emerged, including personal and household obligations. Fifty-seven percent of trainees disagreed that the definition of nonphysician obligations was clear. Forty-seven percent agreed definitions held by anesthesiology trainees were aligned. Sixty-two percent felt that different medical specialties did not share a common definition. Classification of typical anesthesiology tasks as physician/ nonphysician was heterogenous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\"Nonphysician obligations\" are defined by a new, nuanced, specialty-specific explanatory framework, and those that impact education are summarized in distinct classes. Trainee definitions and attitudes expose possible faults in how nonphysician obligations are currently evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":56372,"journal":{"name":"A&A practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"e01885"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Are \\\"Nonphysician Obligations\\\" Anyway? A Survey Study Exploring Their Impact on Anesthesiology Resident Education and Developing a Conceptual Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas R Cormier, Daniel A Kinney, Robert R Gaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education defines \\\"nonphysician obligations\\\" as \\\"duties performed by nursing and allied health professionals, transport services, or clerical staff.\\\" How anesthesiology trainees understand the concept of \\\"nonphysician obligations\\\" and are impacted by these obligations is incompletely understood. The objective of the study was to identify how anesthesiology trainees define \\\"nonphysician obligations,\\\" which obligations impact trainee education, and what attitudes trainees hold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was administered to Anesthesiology residents (N = 86) at a large academic hospital in 2023. Respondents defined \\\"nonphysician obligations,\\\" listed obligations that impacted their education, and indicated the frequency of these obligations. Respondents scored their agreement with statements appraising attitudes toward the clarity and consistency of the term and classified anesthesiology tasks as physician/nonphysician. The authors developed a conceptual framework defining \\\"nonphysician obligations\\\" using grounded theory and categorized the participants' responses based on this framework. Tallies assessed which obligations and attitudes were most prominent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 82.6% (n = 71). Respondents defined nonphysician obligations with either a patient-centered or physician-centered framework. Tasks spanning nursing, patient transport, anesthesia technicians, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and care coordinators impacted education most. Outlier definitions and obligations emerged, including personal and household obligations. Fifty-seven percent of trainees disagreed that the definition of nonphysician obligations was clear. Forty-seven percent agreed definitions held by anesthesiology trainees were aligned. Sixty-two percent felt that different medical specialties did not share a common definition. Classification of typical anesthesiology tasks as physician/ nonphysician was heterogenous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\\"Nonphysician obligations\\\" are defined by a new, nuanced, specialty-specific explanatory framework, and those that impact education are summarized in distinct classes. Trainee definitions and attitudes expose possible faults in how nonphysician obligations are currently evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A&A practice\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"e01885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A&A practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究生医学教育认证委员会将“非医师义务”定义为“护理和专职卫生专业人员、运输服务人员或文职人员履行的职责”。麻醉学受训者如何理解“非医师义务”的概念以及如何受到这些义务的影响尚不完全清楚。本研究的目的是确定麻醉学受训者如何定义“非医师义务”,哪些义务影响受训者教育,以及受训者持有什么态度。方法:对某大型专科医院2023年麻醉科住院医师86名进行调查。受访者定义了“非医生义务”,列出了影响他们教育的义务,并指出了这些义务的频率。受访者对他们对术语的清晰度和一致性的评价态度的陈述进行了评分,并将麻醉学任务分类为医生/非医生。作者开发了一个概念性框架来定义“非医生义务”,并根据该框架对参与者的反应进行了分类。统计评估了哪些义务和态度最为突出。结果:有效率为82.6% (n = 71)。受访者用以患者为中心或以医生为中心的框架来定义非医生义务。护理、病人转运、麻醉技师、注册麻醉师护士和护理协调员等任务对教育的影响最大。出现了异常的定义和义务,包括个人和家庭义务。57%的受训者不认为非医生义务的定义是明确的。47%的人同意麻醉学学员所持有的定义是一致的。62%的人认为不同的医学专业没有共同的定义。典型麻醉学任务的医师/非医师分类存在异质性。结论:“非医生义务”由一个新的、细致的、特定专业的解释框架来定义,而那些影响教育的义务则在不同的班级中进行总结。受训者的定义和态度暴露了目前评估非医生义务的可能错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Are "Nonphysician Obligations" Anyway? A Survey Study Exploring Their Impact on Anesthesiology Resident Education and Developing a Conceptual Framework.

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education defines "nonphysician obligations" as "duties performed by nursing and allied health professionals, transport services, or clerical staff." How anesthesiology trainees understand the concept of "nonphysician obligations" and are impacted by these obligations is incompletely understood. The objective of the study was to identify how anesthesiology trainees define "nonphysician obligations," which obligations impact trainee education, and what attitudes trainees hold.

Methods: A survey was administered to Anesthesiology residents (N = 86) at a large academic hospital in 2023. Respondents defined "nonphysician obligations," listed obligations that impacted their education, and indicated the frequency of these obligations. Respondents scored their agreement with statements appraising attitudes toward the clarity and consistency of the term and classified anesthesiology tasks as physician/nonphysician. The authors developed a conceptual framework defining "nonphysician obligations" using grounded theory and categorized the participants' responses based on this framework. Tallies assessed which obligations and attitudes were most prominent.

Results: The response rate was 82.6% (n = 71). Respondents defined nonphysician obligations with either a patient-centered or physician-centered framework. Tasks spanning nursing, patient transport, anesthesia technicians, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and care coordinators impacted education most. Outlier definitions and obligations emerged, including personal and household obligations. Fifty-seven percent of trainees disagreed that the definition of nonphysician obligations was clear. Forty-seven percent agreed definitions held by anesthesiology trainees were aligned. Sixty-two percent felt that different medical specialties did not share a common definition. Classification of typical anesthesiology tasks as physician/ nonphysician was heterogenous.

Conclusions: "Nonphysician obligations" are defined by a new, nuanced, specialty-specific explanatory framework, and those that impact education are summarized in distinct classes. Trainee definitions and attitudes expose possible faults in how nonphysician obligations are currently evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
A&A practice
A&A practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信