Julian Hamfjord , Tormod Kyrre Guren , Bengt Glimelius , Halfdan Sorbye , Per Pfeiffer , Olav Dajani , Ole Christian Lingjærde , Kjell Magne Tveit , Karen-Lise Garm Spindler , Niels Pallisgaard , Elin H. Kure
{"title":"探讨RAS-/ braf突变的转移性结直肠癌患者CEA、ctDNA和cfDNA的早期动力学特征","authors":"Julian Hamfjord , Tormod Kyrre Guren , Bengt Glimelius , Halfdan Sorbye , Per Pfeiffer , Olav Dajani , Ole Christian Lingjærde , Kjell Magne Tveit , Karen-Lise Garm Spindler , Niels Pallisgaard , Elin H. Kure","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) respond differently to first-line chemotherapy. Early identification of patients with limited or no clinical benefit could prompt a timelier introduction of second-line therapy and potentially lead to improved overall outcomes. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is currently the only blood-based marker in clinical use for disease control monitoring in mCRC. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could become a useful surrogate for oncological outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Forty patients with <em>RAS-</em>/<em>BRAF-</em>mutated mCRC from the prospective NORDIC-VII trial (NCT00145314) were included. An exploratory model system was made to describe the early on-treatment kinetics of CEA, cfDNA and ctDNA during first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and investigate the associations with radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Summary metrics were made, representing percentage change from treatment start to time-grid day 7 (P<sub>7</sub>), day 14 (P<sub>14</sub>), and day 49 (P<sub>49</sub>); slope from time-grid day 0 to 7 (S<sub>7</sub>), day 8 to 14 (S<sub>14</sub>), and day 15 to 49 (S<sub>49</sub>); and area under the curve from time-grid day 0 to 49 (AUC). Notably P<sub>49</sub> and S<sub>49</sub> for ctDNA and CEA were associated with radiological response and/or PFS. The early dynamics of the two markers differed substantially, with faster and more marked changes in ctDNA compared with CEA. Nine patients did not reach complete/near complete molecular ctDNA response close to first evaluation (∼week 8), a state associated with a short PFS (HR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.22-6.06; <em>P</em> = .01) and OS (HR 3.12; 95% CI, 1.35-7.23; <em>P</em> < .01). Contrary, twenty-two patients did not reach radiological response (i.e., complete or partial response) at first evaluation, but this was not associated with PFS (HR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.64-2.30; <em>P</em> = .55) nor OS (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.70-2.68; <em>P</em> = .37).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early dynamics of ctDNA during first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy hold prognostic value, supporting the idea of prospectively validating a ctDNA-RECIST framework in the early care pathway of mCRC patients.</div><div><strong>Trial registration:</strong> ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00145314</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Pages 153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Early Kinetic Profiles of CEA, ctDNA and cfDNA in Patients With RAS-/BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Julian Hamfjord , Tormod Kyrre Guren , Bengt Glimelius , Halfdan Sorbye , Per Pfeiffer , Olav Dajani , Ole Christian Lingjærde , Kjell Magne Tveit , Karen-Lise Garm Spindler , Niels Pallisgaard , Elin H. Kure\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) respond differently to first-line chemotherapy. Early identification of patients with limited or no clinical benefit could prompt a timelier introduction of second-line therapy and potentially lead to improved overall outcomes. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is currently the only blood-based marker in clinical use for disease control monitoring in mCRC. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could become a useful surrogate for oncological outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Forty patients with <em>RAS-</em>/<em>BRAF-</em>mutated mCRC from the prospective NORDIC-VII trial (NCT00145314) were included. An exploratory model system was made to describe the early on-treatment kinetics of CEA, cfDNA and ctDNA during first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and investigate the associations with radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Summary metrics were made, representing percentage change from treatment start to time-grid day 7 (P<sub>7</sub>), day 14 (P<sub>14</sub>), and day 49 (P<sub>49</sub>); slope from time-grid day 0 to 7 (S<sub>7</sub>), day 8 to 14 (S<sub>14</sub>), and day 15 to 49 (S<sub>49</sub>); and area under the curve from time-grid day 0 to 49 (AUC). Notably P<sub>49</sub> and S<sub>49</sub> for ctDNA and CEA were associated with radiological response and/or PFS. The early dynamics of the two markers differed substantially, with faster and more marked changes in ctDNA compared with CEA. Nine patients did not reach complete/near complete molecular ctDNA response close to first evaluation (∼week 8), a state associated with a short PFS (HR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.22-6.06; <em>P</em> = .01) and OS (HR 3.12; 95% CI, 1.35-7.23; <em>P</em> < .01). Contrary, twenty-two patients did not reach radiological response (i.e., complete or partial response) at first evaluation, but this was not associated with PFS (HR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.64-2.30; <em>P</em> = .55) nor OS (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.70-2.68; <em>P</em> = .37).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early dynamics of ctDNA during first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy hold prognostic value, supporting the idea of prospectively validating a ctDNA-RECIST framework in the early care pathway of mCRC patients.</div><div><strong>Trial registration:</strong> ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00145314</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 153-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824001130\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824001130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring Early Kinetic Profiles of CEA, ctDNA and cfDNA in Patients With RAS-/BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Introduction
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) respond differently to first-line chemotherapy. Early identification of patients with limited or no clinical benefit could prompt a timelier introduction of second-line therapy and potentially lead to improved overall outcomes. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is currently the only blood-based marker in clinical use for disease control monitoring in mCRC. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could become a useful surrogate for oncological outcomes.
Materials and Methods
Forty patients with RAS-/BRAF-mutated mCRC from the prospective NORDIC-VII trial (NCT00145314) were included. An exploratory model system was made to describe the early on-treatment kinetics of CEA, cfDNA and ctDNA during first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and investigate the associations with radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Summary metrics were made, representing percentage change from treatment start to time-grid day 7 (P7), day 14 (P14), and day 49 (P49); slope from time-grid day 0 to 7 (S7), day 8 to 14 (S14), and day 15 to 49 (S49); and area under the curve from time-grid day 0 to 49 (AUC). Notably P49 and S49 for ctDNA and CEA were associated with radiological response and/or PFS. The early dynamics of the two markers differed substantially, with faster and more marked changes in ctDNA compared with CEA. Nine patients did not reach complete/near complete molecular ctDNA response close to first evaluation (∼week 8), a state associated with a short PFS (HR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.22-6.06; P = .01) and OS (HR 3.12; 95% CI, 1.35-7.23; P < .01). Contrary, twenty-two patients did not reach radiological response (i.e., complete or partial response) at first evaluation, but this was not associated with PFS (HR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.64-2.30; P = .55) nor OS (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.70-2.68; P = .37).
Conclusion
Early dynamics of ctDNA during first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy hold prognostic value, supporting the idea of prospectively validating a ctDNA-RECIST framework in the early care pathway of mCRC patients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.