脐动脉脉搏指数参考范围的比较。

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
J R Duncan, L E Markel, K Pressman, A R Rodriguez, S G Obican, A O Odibo
{"title":"脐动脉脉搏指数参考范围的比较。","authors":"J R Duncan, L E Markel, K Pressman, A R Rodriguez, S G Obican, A O Odibo","doi":"10.1002/uog.29142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the accuracy of four published reference standards for the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) in predicting small-for-gestational age (SGA), adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications in pregnancies at risk for fetal growth restriction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a prospective study of singleton pregnancies that underwent fetal growth assessment by ultrasound between 26 and 36 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies with estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference < 20<sup>th</sup> percentile with UA-PI measurements available were included. We excluded fetuses with chromosomal anomaly or congenital malformation and those without delivery information. The predictive ability of UA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> percentile according to the reference standards of Acharya et al., the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project, the Fetal Medicine Foundation and Parra-Cordero et al. for SGA, a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes and a composite of obstetric complications was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1054 pregnancies that underwent fetal growth evaluation by ultrasound, 207 were included in our analysis. SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications were diagnosed in 94 (45.4%), 50 (24.2%) and 69 (33.3%) cases, respectively. All reference standards had similar and statistically significant but poor predictive accuracy for SGA (AUC of 0.55 to 0.56), adverse neonatal outcomes (AUC of 0.57 to 0.60) and obstetric complications (AUC of 0.55 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reference standards for UA-PI evaluated herein have poor predictive ability for SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications. At present, no particular UA-PI reference standard can be recommended over others. Larger trials are needed to answer this research question. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"65 1","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of umbilical artery pulsatility index reference ranges.\",\"authors\":\"J R Duncan, L E Markel, K Pressman, A R Rodriguez, S G Obican, A O Odibo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/uog.29142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the accuracy of four published reference standards for the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) in predicting small-for-gestational age (SGA), adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications in pregnancies at risk for fetal growth restriction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a prospective study of singleton pregnancies that underwent fetal growth assessment by ultrasound between 26 and 36 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies with estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference < 20<sup>th</sup> percentile with UA-PI measurements available were included. We excluded fetuses with chromosomal anomaly or congenital malformation and those without delivery information. The predictive ability of UA-PI > 95<sup>th</sup> percentile according to the reference standards of Acharya et al., the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project, the Fetal Medicine Foundation and Parra-Cordero et al. for SGA, a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes and a composite of obstetric complications was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1054 pregnancies that underwent fetal growth evaluation by ultrasound, 207 were included in our analysis. SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications were diagnosed in 94 (45.4%), 50 (24.2%) and 69 (33.3%) cases, respectively. All reference standards had similar and statistically significant but poor predictive accuracy for SGA (AUC of 0.55 to 0.56), adverse neonatal outcomes (AUC of 0.57 to 0.60) and obstetric complications (AUC of 0.55 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reference standards for UA-PI evaluated herein have poor predictive ability for SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications. At present, no particular UA-PI reference standard can be recommended over others. Larger trials are needed to answer this research question. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"71-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29142\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较脐动脉搏动指数(UA-PI)在预测胎儿生长受限风险孕妇小胎龄(SGA)、新生儿不良结局和产科并发症方面的准确性。方法:这是一项对单胎妊娠的前瞻性研究的二次分析,该研究在妊娠26至36周期间通过超声进行胎儿生长评估。估计胎儿体重或腹围的孕妇包括有UA-PI测量的百分位数。我们排除了有染色体异常或先天性畸形的胎儿和没有分娩信息的胎儿。根据Acharya等人的参考标准,UA-PI的预测能力为0.95百分位。, intergrowth -21项目,胎儿医学基金会和Parra-Cordero等人。对于SGA,使用接受者-操作-特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来比较新生儿不良结局和产科并发症的综合情况。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:在1054例接受超声胎儿生长评估的妊娠中,有207例纳入我们的分析。SGA、新生儿不良结局和产科并发症分别为94例(45.4%)、50例(24.2%)和69例(33.3%)。所有参考标准对SGA (AUC为0.55 ~ 0.56)、新生儿不良结局(AUC为0.57 ~ 0.60)和产科并发症(所有参考标准的AUC均为0.55)的预测准确性相似且具有统计学意义,但较差。结论:本文评价的UA-PI参考标准对SGA、新生儿不良结局及产科并发症的预测能力较差。目前,没有特定的UA-PI参考标准可以推荐给其他标准。需要更大规模的试验来回答这个研究问题。©2024国际妇产科超声学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of umbilical artery pulsatility index reference ranges.

Objective: To compare the accuracy of four published reference standards for the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) in predicting small-for-gestational age (SGA), adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications in pregnancies at risk for fetal growth restriction.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective study of singleton pregnancies that underwent fetal growth assessment by ultrasound between 26 and 36 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies with estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference < 20th percentile with UA-PI measurements available were included. We excluded fetuses with chromosomal anomaly or congenital malformation and those without delivery information. The predictive ability of UA-PI > 95th percentile according to the reference standards of Acharya et al., the INTERGROWTH-21st Project, the Fetal Medicine Foundation and Parra-Cordero et al. for SGA, a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes and a composite of obstetric complications was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

Results: Of the 1054 pregnancies that underwent fetal growth evaluation by ultrasound, 207 were included in our analysis. SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications were diagnosed in 94 (45.4%), 50 (24.2%) and 69 (33.3%) cases, respectively. All reference standards had similar and statistically significant but poor predictive accuracy for SGA (AUC of 0.55 to 0.56), adverse neonatal outcomes (AUC of 0.57 to 0.60) and obstetric complications (AUC of 0.55 for all).

Conclusions: The reference standards for UA-PI evaluated herein have poor predictive ability for SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications. At present, no particular UA-PI reference standard can be recommended over others. Larger trials are needed to answer this research question. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信