医学生接受心肺复苏的障碍和意愿与居住地的关系——一项单中心研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2512451
Filip Jaskiewicz, Jakub R Bieliński, Adam Jedrzejczak, Riley Huntley
{"title":"医学生接受心肺复苏的障碍和意愿与居住地的关系——一项单中心研究。","authors":"Filip Jaskiewicz, Jakub R Bieliński, Adam Jedrzejczak, Riley Huntley","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2512451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bystander-administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. However, only roughly 58% of bystanders would provide CPR, with wide variations across different regions. Identifying each factor affecting the barrier or readiness to perform resuscitation is a significant challenge for researchers. This study aimed to evaluate the obstacles preventing first-year medical students from initiating CPR, focusing on the size of domestic residential environments and the time and methodology of practical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original online questionnaire surveyed first-year medical students at the Medical University of Łódź from February 1 to March 2, 2024. The questionnaire development involved a literature review, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. Participation was voluntary and anonymous, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using PQStat software, employing descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that 271 medical students reported a similar median of barriers regardless of the place of residence (median (Me) = 5, interquartile range (IQR) 2-6.25 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6, <i>p</i> = 0.620). Out of 18 analyzed barriers, the only significant difference was found for crowded places. Medical students living in cities most frequently reported a willingness to perform CPR with rescue breaths for all victims. Those who grew up in towns <100,000 residents were less willing to start CPR if an unknown adult were the victim (rural area: 39.2% vs. town: 17.6% vs. city: 45.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The number of reported barriers was similar regardless of training type and the time since training; however, the nature of these barriers varied after a year passed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents across various locations reported similar number and types of barriers to performing CPR, including the most commonly declared fear of harm, uncertainty about recognizing cardiac arrest, and concerns about disease transmission. Although differences connected to the type of victims were observed, its low or moderate practical significance needs more comprehensive research on the impact of the size of the place of residence on the willingness to perform resuscitation and the related barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 12","pages":"451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Willingness to Undertake Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Reported by Medical Students Dependent on Their Place of Residence-A Single-Center Study.\",\"authors\":\"Filip Jaskiewicz, Jakub R Bieliński, Adam Jedrzejczak, Riley Huntley\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2512451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bystander-administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. However, only roughly 58% of bystanders would provide CPR, with wide variations across different regions. Identifying each factor affecting the barrier or readiness to perform resuscitation is a significant challenge for researchers. This study aimed to evaluate the obstacles preventing first-year medical students from initiating CPR, focusing on the size of domestic residential environments and the time and methodology of practical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original online questionnaire surveyed first-year medical students at the Medical University of Łódź from February 1 to March 2, 2024. The questionnaire development involved a literature review, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. Participation was voluntary and anonymous, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using PQStat software, employing descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that 271 medical students reported a similar median of barriers regardless of the place of residence (median (Me) = 5, interquartile range (IQR) 2-6.25 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6, <i>p</i> = 0.620). Out of 18 analyzed barriers, the only significant difference was found for crowded places. Medical students living in cities most frequently reported a willingness to perform CPR with rescue breaths for all victims. Those who grew up in towns <100,000 residents were less willing to start CPR if an unknown adult were the victim (rural area: 39.2% vs. town: 17.6% vs. city: 45.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The number of reported barriers was similar regardless of training type and the time since training; however, the nature of these barriers varied after a year passed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents across various locations reported similar number and types of barriers to performing CPR, including the most commonly declared fear of harm, uncertainty about recognizing cardiac arrest, and concerns about disease transmission. Although differences connected to the type of victims were observed, its low or moderate practical significance needs more comprehensive research on the impact of the size of the place of residence on the willingness to perform resuscitation and the related barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2512451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2512451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)对院外心脏骤停患者的生存至关重要。然而,只有大约58%的旁观者会提供心肺复苏术,不同地区的差异很大。确定每一个影响障碍或准备进行复苏的因素是研究人员面临的重大挑战。本研究旨在评估阻碍一年级医学生启动心肺复苏术的障碍,重点关注家庭居住环境的大小以及实践培训的时间和方法。方法:采用原始在线问卷,于2024年2月1日至3月2日对Łódź医科大学医一年级学生进行调查。问卷的开发包括文献回顾、专家评估和试点测试。参与是自愿和匿名的,有严格的纳入和排除标准。数据分析采用PQStat软件,采用描述性统计。结果:271名医学生报告的障碍中位数与居住地相似(中位数(Me) = 5,四分位数间距(IQR) 2-6.25 vs Me = 4, IQR 3-6 vs Me = 4, IQR 3-6, p = 0.620)。在分析的18个障碍中,唯一的显著差异是在拥挤的地方。居住在城市的医科学生最常报告说,他们愿意为所有受害者进行心肺复苏术和人工呼吸。在城镇长大者p < 0.01)。无论训练类型和训练后的时间如何,报告的障碍数量相似;然而,一年后,这些障碍的性质发生了变化。结论:不同地区的受访者报告了实施CPR的类似数量和类型的障碍,包括最常见的对伤害的恐惧、对识别心脏骤停的不确定以及对疾病传播的担忧。虽然观察到与受害者类型相关的差异,但其低或中等的现实意义需要更全面地研究居住地大小对实施复苏意愿的影响及其相关障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Willingness to Undertake Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Reported by Medical Students Dependent on Their Place of Residence-A Single-Center Study.

Background: Bystander-administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. However, only roughly 58% of bystanders would provide CPR, with wide variations across different regions. Identifying each factor affecting the barrier or readiness to perform resuscitation is a significant challenge for researchers. This study aimed to evaluate the obstacles preventing first-year medical students from initiating CPR, focusing on the size of domestic residential environments and the time and methodology of practical training.

Methods: The original online questionnaire surveyed first-year medical students at the Medical University of Łódź from February 1 to March 2, 2024. The questionnaire development involved a literature review, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. Participation was voluntary and anonymous, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using PQStat software, employing descriptive statistics.

Results: The study revealed that 271 medical students reported a similar median of barriers regardless of the place of residence (median (Me) = 5, interquartile range (IQR) 2-6.25 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6, p = 0.620). Out of 18 analyzed barriers, the only significant difference was found for crowded places. Medical students living in cities most frequently reported a willingness to perform CPR with rescue breaths for all victims. Those who grew up in towns <100,000 residents were less willing to start CPR if an unknown adult were the victim (rural area: 39.2% vs. town: 17.6% vs. city: 45.1%, p < 0.01). The number of reported barriers was similar regardless of training type and the time since training; however, the nature of these barriers varied after a year passed.

Conclusions: Respondents across various locations reported similar number and types of barriers to performing CPR, including the most commonly declared fear of harm, uncertainty about recognizing cardiac arrest, and concerns about disease transmission. Although differences connected to the type of victims were observed, its low or moderate practical significance needs more comprehensive research on the impact of the size of the place of residence on the willingness to perform resuscitation and the related barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信