社会心理信息共享提高肾移植评估的公平性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Adam S Wilk, Anne M Huml, Megan Urbanski, Dorothy Muench, Kristen M Fischer
{"title":"社会心理信息共享提高肾移植评估的公平性。","authors":"Adam S Wilk, Anne M Huml, Megan Urbanski, Dorothy Muench, Kristen M Fischer","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Increasing transplant access overall and particularly among historically underserved and marginalized patient groups is a shared goal nationwide. Patient challenges with psychosocial factors, such as social support and health literacy, are recognized as among the top reasons patients may not be referred, evaluated, or waitlisted, key steps along the pathway to transplantation. Yet referring providers' (e.g., dialysis clinics') and transplant centers' processes for measuring, communicating about, and addressing patients' psychosocial challenges are inconsistent, can emphasize measures more relevant to dialysis care than transplant care, and are highly susceptible to implicit bias.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In this article, we illuminate the opportunity to standardize the patient psychosocial information that dialysis clinics and other nephrology care providers share with the transplant center when referring a patient for transplant evaluation. We highlight potential benefits and trade-offs to this approach and describe how regional coalitions comprising patients, caregivers, and community members can support developing and implementing a standardized template for this purpose, as well as the objectives that the coalition's efforts should pursue to this end.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Standardized templates for psychosocial information sharing at referral represent a key opportunity to improve quality, efficiency, and equity in pretransplant care as well as transplant access outcomes broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial information sharing to improve equity in kidney transplant evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Adam S Wilk, Anne M Huml, Megan Urbanski, Dorothy Muench, Kristen M Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Increasing transplant access overall and particularly among historically underserved and marginalized patient groups is a shared goal nationwide. Patient challenges with psychosocial factors, such as social support and health literacy, are recognized as among the top reasons patients may not be referred, evaluated, or waitlisted, key steps along the pathway to transplantation. Yet referring providers' (e.g., dialysis clinics') and transplant centers' processes for measuring, communicating about, and addressing patients' psychosocial challenges are inconsistent, can emphasize measures more relevant to dialysis care than transplant care, and are highly susceptible to implicit bias.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In this article, we illuminate the opportunity to standardize the patient psychosocial information that dialysis clinics and other nephrology care providers share with the transplant center when referring a patient for transplant evaluation. We highlight potential benefits and trade-offs to this approach and describe how regional coalitions comprising patients, caregivers, and community members can support developing and implementing a standardized template for this purpose, as well as the objectives that the coalition's efforts should pursue to this end.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Standardized templates for psychosocial information sharing at referral represent a key opportunity to improve quality, efficiency, and equity in pretransplant care as well as transplant access outcomes broadly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:总体上,特别是在历史上服务不足和边缘化的患者群体中,增加移植的可及性是全国的共同目标。患者在社会心理因素方面的挑战,如社会支持和健康素养,被认为是患者可能无法转诊、评估或等待的主要原因之一,这是移植途径的关键步骤。然而,转诊提供者(如透析诊所)和移植中心测量、沟通和解决患者心理社会挑战的过程是不一致的,可能会强调与透析护理比移植护理更相关的措施,并且很容易受到隐性偏见的影响。最近的发现:在这篇文章中,我们阐明了标准化患者心理社会信息的机会,透析诊所和其他肾脏学护理提供者在推荐患者进行移植评估时与移植中心共享。我们强调了这种方法的潜在好处和权衡,并描述了由患者、护理人员和社区成员组成的区域联盟如何支持为此目的开发和实施标准化模板,以及联盟应努力实现的目标。摘要:转诊时社会心理信息共享的标准化模板是提高移植前护理质量、效率和公平性以及广泛的移植可及性结果的关键机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychosocial information sharing to improve equity in kidney transplant evaluation.

Purpose of review: Increasing transplant access overall and particularly among historically underserved and marginalized patient groups is a shared goal nationwide. Patient challenges with psychosocial factors, such as social support and health literacy, are recognized as among the top reasons patients may not be referred, evaluated, or waitlisted, key steps along the pathway to transplantation. Yet referring providers' (e.g., dialysis clinics') and transplant centers' processes for measuring, communicating about, and addressing patients' psychosocial challenges are inconsistent, can emphasize measures more relevant to dialysis care than transplant care, and are highly susceptible to implicit bias.

Recent findings: In this article, we illuminate the opportunity to standardize the patient psychosocial information that dialysis clinics and other nephrology care providers share with the transplant center when referring a patient for transplant evaluation. We highlight potential benefits and trade-offs to this approach and describe how regional coalitions comprising patients, caregivers, and community members can support developing and implementing a standardized template for this purpose, as well as the objectives that the coalition's efforts should pursue to this end.

Summary: Standardized templates for psychosocial information sharing at referral represent a key opportunity to improve quality, efficiency, and equity in pretransplant care as well as transplant access outcomes broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信