头孢曲松预测肠杆菌分离株对口服高代头孢菌素的敏感性有多准确?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1128/aac.01387-24
Kimberly C Claeys, Patricia J Simner, Tsigereda Tekle, Anthony D Harris, Emily Jacobs, Sara E Cosgrove, Pranita D Tamma
{"title":"头孢曲松预测肠杆菌分离株对口服高代头孢菌素的敏感性有多准确?","authors":"Kimberly C Claeys, Patricia J Simner, Tsigereda Tekle, Anthony D Harris, Emily Jacobs, Sara E Cosgrove, Pranita D Tamma","doi":"10.1128/aac.01387-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reliability of ceftriaxone for inferring susceptibility to higher-generation oral cephalosporins is unknown. Overall, ceftriaxone susceptibility predicted susceptibility to cefuroxime (89%), cefdinir (86%), cefpodoxime (90%), and cefixime (94%) based on disk diffusion results for 409 consecutive Enterobacterales bloodstream isolates from unique patients. Susceptibility percentages to the four oral cephalosporins ranged from 92% to 99% when limited to <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis</i> isolates susceptible to ceftriaxone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0138724"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How accurate is ceftriaxone at predicting susceptibility of enterobacterales isolates to oral higher-generation cephalosporins?\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly C Claeys, Patricia J Simner, Tsigereda Tekle, Anthony D Harris, Emily Jacobs, Sara E Cosgrove, Pranita D Tamma\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.01387-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The reliability of ceftriaxone for inferring susceptibility to higher-generation oral cephalosporins is unknown. Overall, ceftriaxone susceptibility predicted susceptibility to cefuroxime (89%), cefdinir (86%), cefpodoxime (90%), and cefixime (94%) based on disk diffusion results for 409 consecutive Enterobacterales bloodstream isolates from unique patients. Susceptibility percentages to the four oral cephalosporins ranged from 92% to 99% when limited to <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis</i> isolates susceptible to ceftriaxone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0138724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01387-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01387-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头孢曲松用于推断对更一代口服头孢菌素易感性的可靠性尚不清楚。总体而言,基于从个别患者连续分离的409株肠杆菌血液分离株的盘扩散结果,头孢曲松敏感性预测对头孢呋辛(89%)、头孢地尼(86%)、头孢多肟(90%)和头孢克肟(94%)的敏感性。当只限于对头孢曲松敏感的大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、产氧克雷伯菌或奇异变形杆菌分离株时,对四种口服头孢菌素的敏感性百分比从92%到99%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How accurate is ceftriaxone at predicting susceptibility of enterobacterales isolates to oral higher-generation cephalosporins?

The reliability of ceftriaxone for inferring susceptibility to higher-generation oral cephalosporins is unknown. Overall, ceftriaxone susceptibility predicted susceptibility to cefuroxime (89%), cefdinir (86%), cefpodoxime (90%), and cefixime (94%) based on disk diffusion results for 409 consecutive Enterobacterales bloodstream isolates from unique patients. Susceptibility percentages to the four oral cephalosporins ranged from 92% to 99% when limited to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis isolates susceptible to ceftriaxone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信