估计葡萄糖处置率的预测价值及其与心肌梗死、心力衰竭、房颤和缺血性脑卒中的关系。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hao Huang MD, Yan Xiong MD, Jie Zhou MD, Yijia Tang MD, Fuli Chen BS, Gang Li MD, Hui Huang MD, Long Zhou PhD
{"title":"估计葡萄糖处置率的预测价值及其与心肌梗死、心力衰竭、房颤和缺血性脑卒中的关系。","authors":"Hao Huang MD,&nbsp;Yan Xiong MD,&nbsp;Jie Zhou MD,&nbsp;Yijia Tang MD,&nbsp;Fuli Chen BS,&nbsp;Gang Li MD,&nbsp;Hui Huang MD,&nbsp;Long Zhou PhD","doi":"10.1111/dom.16132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The relationship between the incidence of major cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a proxy measurement for insulin resistance (IR), is not well understood in the general population. The predictive value of eGDR and other proxies of IR for CVD incidents have not been examined in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the association between eGDR and various CVD events, including myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke. Additionally, the predictive values of eGDR, triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-waist circumference (WC), TyG-body mass index (BMI), TyG-waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), triglyceride (TG)-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (TG/HDL-C) and the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) for CVD events were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study population was extracted from the UK Biobank, and the CVD events were documented by linking to hospital records. Cox proportional hazards model and the restricted cubic spline model were used to assess the association between eGDR and the risk of CVDs with adjustment for potential confounders. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive values of eGDR, TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 360 953 participants were included in this study. During a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 12 698 MI, 10 360 HF, 23 638 AF and 6512 ischemic stroke events were documented. Compared with participants in the lowest quartile category of eGDR, those in the highest quartile category had the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.59 (0.51–0.67) for MI, 0.66 (0.56–0.76) for HF, 0.88 (0.80–0.98) for AF and 0.73 (0.61–0.89) for ischemic stroke. eGDR outperformed TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR in terms of predicting MI (AUC: 0.661), HF (AUC: 0.690), AF (AUC: 0.653) and ischemic stroke (AUC: 0.646).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>eGDR was inversely associated with the incidence of MI, HF, AF and ischemic stroke in the general population. eGDR could serve as a more valuable predictive indicator than TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR for CVD events in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"27 3","pages":"1359-1368"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive value of estimated glucose disposal rate and its association with myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke\",\"authors\":\"Hao Huang MD,&nbsp;Yan Xiong MD,&nbsp;Jie Zhou MD,&nbsp;Yijia Tang MD,&nbsp;Fuli Chen BS,&nbsp;Gang Li MD,&nbsp;Hui Huang MD,&nbsp;Long Zhou PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.16132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The relationship between the incidence of major cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a proxy measurement for insulin resistance (IR), is not well understood in the general population. The predictive value of eGDR and other proxies of IR for CVD incidents have not been examined in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the association between eGDR and various CVD events, including myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke. Additionally, the predictive values of eGDR, triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-waist circumference (WC), TyG-body mass index (BMI), TyG-waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), triglyceride (TG)-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (TG/HDL-C) and the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) for CVD events were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study population was extracted from the UK Biobank, and the CVD events were documented by linking to hospital records. Cox proportional hazards model and the restricted cubic spline model were used to assess the association between eGDR and the risk of CVDs with adjustment for potential confounders. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive values of eGDR, TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 360 953 participants were included in this study. During a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 12 698 MI, 10 360 HF, 23 638 AF and 6512 ischemic stroke events were documented. Compared with participants in the lowest quartile category of eGDR, those in the highest quartile category had the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.59 (0.51–0.67) for MI, 0.66 (0.56–0.76) for HF, 0.88 (0.80–0.98) for AF and 0.73 (0.61–0.89) for ischemic stroke. eGDR outperformed TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR in terms of predicting MI (AUC: 0.661), HF (AUC: 0.690), AF (AUC: 0.653) and ischemic stroke (AUC: 0.646).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>eGDR was inversely associated with the incidence of MI, HF, AF and ischemic stroke in the general population. eGDR could serve as a more valuable predictive indicator than TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR for CVD events in clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"1359-1368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16132\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在一般人群中,主要心血管疾病(cvd)的发病率与估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)之间的关系尚不清楚,eGDR是胰岛素抵抗(IR)的替代指标。在以往的研究中,eGDR和其他IR指标对CVD事件的预测价值尚未得到检验。本研究旨在探讨eGDR与各种CVD事件的关系,包括心肌梗死(MI)、心力衰竭(HF)、心房颤动(AF)和缺血性卒中。此外,比较eGDR、甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数、TyG腰围(WC)、TyG体重指数(BMI)、TyG腰高比(WHtR)、甘油三酯(TG)-高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)比(TG/HDL-C)和胰岛素抵抗代谢评分(METS-IR)对CVD事件的预测价值。方法:研究人群从英国生物银行中提取,并通过与医院记录的链接记录心血管疾病事件。采用Cox比例风险模型和受限三次样条模型评估eGDR与心血管疾病风险之间的相关性,并对潜在混杂因素进行校正。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)比较eGDR、TyG、TyG- wc、TyG- bmi、TyG- whtr、TG/HDL-C和met - ir的预测值。结果:本研究共纳入360953名受试者。在中位随访13.8年期间,记录了12 698例心肌梗死、10 360例心衰、23 638例房颤和6512例缺血性卒中事件。与eGDR最低四分位数类别的参与者相比,最高四分位数类别的参与者的调整风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)分别为心肌梗死0.59(0.51-0.67)、心衰0.66(0.56-0.76)、房颤0.88(0.80-0.98)和缺血性卒中0.73(0.61-0.89)。eGDR在预测MI (AUC: 0.661)、HF (AUC: 0.690)、AF (AUC: 0.653)和缺血性卒中(AUC: 0.646)方面优于TyG、TyG- wc、TyG- bmi、TyG- whtr、TG/HDL-C和METS-IR。结论:在普通人群中,eGDR与心肌梗死、心衰、房颤和缺血性脑卒中的发生率呈负相关。在临床实践中,eGDR可作为比TyG、TyG- wc、TyG- bmi、TyG- whtr、TG/HDL-C和METS-IR更有价值的CVD事件预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The predictive value of estimated glucose disposal rate and its association with myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke

Aims

The relationship between the incidence of major cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a proxy measurement for insulin resistance (IR), is not well understood in the general population. The predictive value of eGDR and other proxies of IR for CVD incidents have not been examined in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the association between eGDR and various CVD events, including myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke. Additionally, the predictive values of eGDR, triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-waist circumference (WC), TyG-body mass index (BMI), TyG-waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), triglyceride (TG)-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (TG/HDL-C) and the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) for CVD events were compared.

Methods

The study population was extracted from the UK Biobank, and the CVD events were documented by linking to hospital records. Cox proportional hazards model and the restricted cubic spline model were used to assess the association between eGDR and the risk of CVDs with adjustment for potential confounders. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive values of eGDR, TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR.

Results

A total of 360 953 participants were included in this study. During a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 12 698 MI, 10 360 HF, 23 638 AF and 6512 ischemic stroke events were documented. Compared with participants in the lowest quartile category of eGDR, those in the highest quartile category had the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.59 (0.51–0.67) for MI, 0.66 (0.56–0.76) for HF, 0.88 (0.80–0.98) for AF and 0.73 (0.61–0.89) for ischemic stroke. eGDR outperformed TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR in terms of predicting MI (AUC: 0.661), HF (AUC: 0.690), AF (AUC: 0.653) and ischemic stroke (AUC: 0.646).

Conclusions

eGDR was inversely associated with the incidence of MI, HF, AF and ischemic stroke in the general population. eGDR could serve as a more valuable predictive indicator than TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, TyG-WHtR, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR for CVD events in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信