信息投影法平滑倾向得分加权处理随机缺失下的选择偏差

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Hengfang Wang, Jae Kwang Kim
{"title":"信息投影法平滑倾向得分加权处理随机缺失下的选择偏差","authors":"Hengfang Wang,&nbsp;Jae Kwang Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10463-024-00913-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Propensity score weighting is widely used to correct the selection bias in the sample with missing data. The propensity score function is often developed using a model for the response probability, which completely ignores the outcome regression model. In this paper, we explore an alternative approach by developing smoothed propensity score weights that provide a more efficient estimation by removing unnecessary auxiliary variables in the propensity score model. The smoothed propensity score function is obtained by applying the information projection of the original propensity score function to the space that satisfies the moment conditions on the balancing scores obtained from the outcome regression model. By including the covariates for the outcome regression models only in the density ratio model, we can achieve an efficiency gain. Penalized regression is used to identify important covariates. Some limited simulation studies are presented to compare with the existing methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55511,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","volume":"77 1","pages":"127 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information projection approach to smoothed propensity score weighting for handling selection bias under missing at random\",\"authors\":\"Hengfang Wang,&nbsp;Jae Kwang Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10463-024-00913-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Propensity score weighting is widely used to correct the selection bias in the sample with missing data. The propensity score function is often developed using a model for the response probability, which completely ignores the outcome regression model. In this paper, we explore an alternative approach by developing smoothed propensity score weights that provide a more efficient estimation by removing unnecessary auxiliary variables in the propensity score model. The smoothed propensity score function is obtained by applying the information projection of the original propensity score function to the space that satisfies the moment conditions on the balancing scores obtained from the outcome regression model. By including the covariates for the outcome regression models only in the density ratio model, we can achieve an efficiency gain. Penalized regression is used to identify important covariates. Some limited simulation studies are presented to compare with the existing methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10463-024-00913-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10463-024-00913-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

倾向得分加权被广泛用于修正缺失数据样本中的选择偏差。倾向得分函数通常采用响应概率模型,完全忽略了结果回归模型。在本文中,我们通过开发平滑倾向得分权重来探索一种替代方法,该方法通过去除倾向得分模型中不必要的辅助变量来提供更有效的估计。将原倾向得分函数的信息投影到结果回归模型得到的平衡得分满足矩条件的空间,得到平滑倾向得分函数。通过只在密度比模型中包含结果回归模型的协变量,我们可以获得效率增益。惩罚回归用于识别重要的协变量。提出了一些有限的仿真研究,与现有方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Information projection approach to smoothed propensity score weighting for handling selection bias under missing at random

Information projection approach to smoothed propensity score weighting for handling selection bias under missing at random

Propensity score weighting is widely used to correct the selection bias in the sample with missing data. The propensity score function is often developed using a model for the response probability, which completely ignores the outcome regression model. In this paper, we explore an alternative approach by developing smoothed propensity score weights that provide a more efficient estimation by removing unnecessary auxiliary variables in the propensity score model. The smoothed propensity score function is obtained by applying the information projection of the original propensity score function to the space that satisfies the moment conditions on the balancing scores obtained from the outcome regression model. By including the covariates for the outcome regression models only in the density ratio model, we can achieve an efficiency gain. Penalized regression is used to identify important covariates. Some limited simulation studies are presented to compare with the existing methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (AISM) aims to provide a forum for open communication among statisticians, and to contribute to the advancement of statistics as a science to enable humans to handle information in order to cope with uncertainties. It publishes high-quality papers that shed new light on the theoretical, computational and/or methodological aspects of statistical science. Emphasis is placed on (a) development of new methodologies motivated by real data, (b) development of unifying theories, and (c) analysis and improvement of existing methodologies and theories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信