系统可以改变:美国一家大型三级医院临床医师合作的可行性研究。

Jeannette C Myrick, Lily Schneider, Christina Gebel, Kathleen Clarke, Stephanie Crawford, Lucy Chie, Chloe Zera, Karen M Emmons, Elysia Larson
{"title":"系统可以改变:美国一家大型三级医院临床医师合作的可行性研究。","authors":"Jeannette C Myrick, Lily Schneider, Christina Gebel, Kathleen Clarke, Stephanie Crawford, Lucy Chie, Chloe Zera, Karen M Emmons, Elysia Larson","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00682-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doulas, non-clinical professionals who provide support throughout the perinatal period, can positively impact patient experiences and clinical outcomes during birth. Doulas often support hospital-based births without being employed by the hospital system, resulting in varied relationships with hospitals and clinicians. Systems-level changes are needed to maximize collaboration between hospitals and doulas to ensure facilitation of, and not barriers to, doula support. We implemented and evaluated a new program, called the \"Supportive Birth Collaborative,\" to maximize effectiveness of doula support in hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-site feasibility study of the use of implementation mapping to make systemic changes to clinician-doula collaboration for labor and delivery. Implementation mapping consisted of five steps: developing a collaborative of program implementers and knowledge holders, conducting a needs assessment, developing a logic model, applying implementation strategies, and evaluating changes in outcomes. To evaluate change, process data were collected throughout, and implementation outcomes were measured in 2022 and again after one year of implementation via online surveys to all clinicians who provided labor and delivery care. Descriptive statistics were calculated and change over time was analyzed in Stata using log-binomial regression models with clustering to account for respondents who completed both surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"Supportive Birth Collaborative\" (SBC) was founded in November 2021. The first meeting included 19 people, who were obstetricians, anesthesiologists, nurses, doulas, students, social workers, administrators, researchers, and individuals who had given birth at the study hospital. From 2022-2023, the SBC adopted 11 implementation strategies and piloted or fully implemented 10 of them. Implementation strategies ranged from making training dynamic, to changes in the physical environment, to changes in formal policy. In 2022, 104 clinicians participated in the survey; 97 participated in 2023. There was significant improvement in clinician-reported trust in doulas (0.23, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.34) and doula-clinician communication (0.25, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.38). Clinicians had a limited understanding of the doula's role, and that understanding did not significantly improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using implementation mapping as a guide to collaborative work can lead to meaningful health system changes. Regular review of implementation outcomes could allow for adaptation and tailoring of implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Jeannette C Myrick, Lily Schneider, Christina Gebel, Kathleen Clarke, Stephanie Crawford, Lucy Chie, Chloe Zera, Karen M Emmons, Elysia Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-024-00682-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doulas, non-clinical professionals who provide support throughout the perinatal period, can positively impact patient experiences and clinical outcomes during birth. Doulas often support hospital-based births without being employed by the hospital system, resulting in varied relationships with hospitals and clinicians. Systems-level changes are needed to maximize collaboration between hospitals and doulas to ensure facilitation of, and not barriers to, doula support. We implemented and evaluated a new program, called the \\\"Supportive Birth Collaborative,\\\" to maximize effectiveness of doula support in hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-site feasibility study of the use of implementation mapping to make systemic changes to clinician-doula collaboration for labor and delivery. Implementation mapping consisted of five steps: developing a collaborative of program implementers and knowledge holders, conducting a needs assessment, developing a logic model, applying implementation strategies, and evaluating changes in outcomes. To evaluate change, process data were collected throughout, and implementation outcomes were measured in 2022 and again after one year of implementation via online surveys to all clinicians who provided labor and delivery care. Descriptive statistics were calculated and change over time was analyzed in Stata using log-binomial regression models with clustering to account for respondents who completed both surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \\\"Supportive Birth Collaborative\\\" (SBC) was founded in November 2021. The first meeting included 19 people, who were obstetricians, anesthesiologists, nurses, doulas, students, social workers, administrators, researchers, and individuals who had given birth at the study hospital. From 2022-2023, the SBC adopted 11 implementation strategies and piloted or fully implemented 10 of them. Implementation strategies ranged from making training dynamic, to changes in the physical environment, to changes in formal policy. In 2022, 104 clinicians participated in the survey; 97 participated in 2023. There was significant improvement in clinician-reported trust in doulas (0.23, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.34) and doula-clinician communication (0.25, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.38). Clinicians had a limited understanding of the doula's role, and that understanding did not significantly improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using implementation mapping as a guide to collaborative work can lead to meaningful health system changes. Regular review of implementation outcomes could allow for adaptation and tailoring of implementation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686885/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00682-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00682-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:助产师是在整个围产期提供支持的非临床专业人员,可以对分娩期间的患者体验和临床结果产生积极影响。助产师通常在不受雇于医院系统的情况下为医院分娩提供支持,从而导致与医院和临床医生的关系各不相同。需要进行系统层面的变革,以最大限度地提高医院和助产师之间的协作,确保为助产师提供支持提供便利,而不是阻碍。我们实施并评估了一个名为“支持分娩协作”的新项目,以最大限度地提高助产师在医院环境中的支持效率。方法:我们进行了一项单站点可行性研究,利用实施图对临床医生与助产师在分娩过程中的协作进行系统的改变。实现映射由五个步骤组成:开发项目实现者和知识持有者的协作,进行需求评估,开发逻辑模型,应用实现策略,以及评估结果中的变化。为了评估变化,在整个过程中收集了过程数据,并在2022年和实施一年后通过对所有提供分娩和分娩护理的临床医生进行在线调查来测量实施结果。在Stata中计算描述性统计数据,并使用对数二项回归模型和聚类分析随时间的变化,以解释完成两项调查的受访者。结果:“助产协作组”(SBC)于2021年11月成立。第一次会议包括19人,他们是产科医生、麻醉师、护士、助产师、学生、社会工作者、行政人员、研究人员和在研究医院生过孩子的人。从2022年到2023年,SBC通过了11项实施战略,并试点或全面实施了10项。实施战略包括使培训具有活力、改变自然环境、改变正式政策等。2022年,104名临床医生参与了调查;2023年有97人参加。临床医生报告的对助产师的信任(0.23,95% CI: 0.12, 0.34)和助产师与临床医生的沟通(0.25,95% CI: 0.12, 0.38)均有显著改善。临床医生对助产师的角色理解有限,而且这种理解并没有显著提高。结论:利用实施图作为协同工作的指导,可导致有意义的卫生系统变革。定期审查执行结果可以调整和调整执行战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States.

Background: Doulas, non-clinical professionals who provide support throughout the perinatal period, can positively impact patient experiences and clinical outcomes during birth. Doulas often support hospital-based births without being employed by the hospital system, resulting in varied relationships with hospitals and clinicians. Systems-level changes are needed to maximize collaboration between hospitals and doulas to ensure facilitation of, and not barriers to, doula support. We implemented and evaluated a new program, called the "Supportive Birth Collaborative," to maximize effectiveness of doula support in hospital settings.

Methods: We conducted a single-site feasibility study of the use of implementation mapping to make systemic changes to clinician-doula collaboration for labor and delivery. Implementation mapping consisted of five steps: developing a collaborative of program implementers and knowledge holders, conducting a needs assessment, developing a logic model, applying implementation strategies, and evaluating changes in outcomes. To evaluate change, process data were collected throughout, and implementation outcomes were measured in 2022 and again after one year of implementation via online surveys to all clinicians who provided labor and delivery care. Descriptive statistics were calculated and change over time was analyzed in Stata using log-binomial regression models with clustering to account for respondents who completed both surveys.

Results: The "Supportive Birth Collaborative" (SBC) was founded in November 2021. The first meeting included 19 people, who were obstetricians, anesthesiologists, nurses, doulas, students, social workers, administrators, researchers, and individuals who had given birth at the study hospital. From 2022-2023, the SBC adopted 11 implementation strategies and piloted or fully implemented 10 of them. Implementation strategies ranged from making training dynamic, to changes in the physical environment, to changes in formal policy. In 2022, 104 clinicians participated in the survey; 97 participated in 2023. There was significant improvement in clinician-reported trust in doulas (0.23, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.34) and doula-clinician communication (0.25, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.38). Clinicians had a limited understanding of the doula's role, and that understanding did not significantly improve.

Conclusions: Using implementation mapping as a guide to collaborative work can lead to meaningful health system changes. Regular review of implementation outcomes could allow for adaptation and tailoring of implementation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信