Amna Asad, Beattie Robyn Hazel Sturrock, Jessica Carter, John Saunders, Jackie Cassell, Greta Rait, Lorraine McDonagh
{"title":"一般实践衣原体检测:使用行为改变理论的工作人员方法的定性研究。","authors":"Amna Asad, Beattie Robyn Hazel Sturrock, Jessica Carter, John Saunders, Jackie Cassell, Greta Rait, Lorraine McDonagh","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chlamydia is the most diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection in England, but opportunistic testing remains low in general practice despite high prevalence among young people. Attempts to increase testing have been met with little success; therefore, there is a need to explore why rates remain low and how this may be improved.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore general practice staff perceptions of opportunistic chlamydia testing, including barriers, facilitators, interventions, and policies, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative interviews and focus groups with general practice staff in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>23 semi-structured individual interviews and seven focus groups with general practice staff were conducted. Data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis, followed by thematic categorisation onto the Behaviour Change Wheel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified several barriers to chlamydia testing corresponding with BCW components, including low perceived knowledge (psychological capability), general practice context (physical opportunity), cultural norms (social opportunity), testing not prioritised (reflective motivation), and concerns about patient reactions (automatic motivation). Proposed intervention functions included education, persuasion (e.g. posters), incentivisation (e.g. financial incentives), training, and environmental restructuring (e.g. computer reminders). Potential policy categories discussed were communication (e.g. campaigns) and service provision (e.g. GP drop-in sessions at other venues).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified barriers to chlamydia testing in English general practice and potential ways to address these, contributing new insights to existing literature. This research can be utilised to design multi-component, impactful interventions to increase testing in general practice and ultimately reduce harm posed by chlamydia infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practice chlamydia testing: qualitative study of staff approaches using behavioural change theory.\",\"authors\":\"Amna Asad, Beattie Robyn Hazel Sturrock, Jessica Carter, John Saunders, Jackie Cassell, Greta Rait, Lorraine McDonagh\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chlamydia is the most diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection in England, but opportunistic testing remains low in general practice despite high prevalence among young people. Attempts to increase testing have been met with little success; therefore, there is a need to explore why rates remain low and how this may be improved.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore general practice staff perceptions of opportunistic chlamydia testing, including barriers, facilitators, interventions, and policies, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative interviews and focus groups with general practice staff in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>23 semi-structured individual interviews and seven focus groups with general practice staff were conducted. Data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis, followed by thematic categorisation onto the Behaviour Change Wheel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified several barriers to chlamydia testing corresponding with BCW components, including low perceived knowledge (psychological capability), general practice context (physical opportunity), cultural norms (social opportunity), testing not prioritised (reflective motivation), and concerns about patient reactions (automatic motivation). Proposed intervention functions included education, persuasion (e.g. posters), incentivisation (e.g. financial incentives), training, and environmental restructuring (e.g. computer reminders). Potential policy categories discussed were communication (e.g. campaigns) and service provision (e.g. GP drop-in sessions at other venues).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified barriers to chlamydia testing in English general practice and potential ways to address these, contributing new insights to existing literature. This research can be utilised to design multi-component, impactful interventions to increase testing in general practice and ultimately reduce harm posed by chlamydia infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
General practice chlamydia testing: qualitative study of staff approaches using behavioural change theory.
Background: Chlamydia is the most diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection in England, but opportunistic testing remains low in general practice despite high prevalence among young people. Attempts to increase testing have been met with little success; therefore, there is a need to explore why rates remain low and how this may be improved.
Aim: To explore general practice staff perceptions of opportunistic chlamydia testing, including barriers, facilitators, interventions, and policies, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW).
Design and setting: Qualitative interviews and focus groups with general practice staff in England.
Method: 23 semi-structured individual interviews and seven focus groups with general practice staff were conducted. Data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis, followed by thematic categorisation onto the Behaviour Change Wheel.
Results: Participants identified several barriers to chlamydia testing corresponding with BCW components, including low perceived knowledge (psychological capability), general practice context (physical opportunity), cultural norms (social opportunity), testing not prioritised (reflective motivation), and concerns about patient reactions (automatic motivation). Proposed intervention functions included education, persuasion (e.g. posters), incentivisation (e.g. financial incentives), training, and environmental restructuring (e.g. computer reminders). Potential policy categories discussed were communication (e.g. campaigns) and service provision (e.g. GP drop-in sessions at other venues).
Conclusion: This study identified barriers to chlamydia testing in English general practice and potential ways to address these, contributing new insights to existing literature. This research can be utilised to design multi-component, impactful interventions to increase testing in general practice and ultimately reduce harm posed by chlamydia infections.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.