Stephen H Bradley, Richard Neal, Matthew Callister, Benjamin Cornwell, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Bethany Shinkins, Richard Hubbard, Matthew Barclay
{"title":"全科胸片率与早期肺癌诊断和降低全因死亡率相关:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Stephen H Bradley, Richard Neal, Matthew Callister, Benjamin Cornwell, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Bethany Shinkins, Richard Hubbard, Matthew Barclay","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on whether general practice rates of investigation in symptomatic patients using chest x-ray (CXR) affects outcomes is equivocal.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Determine if there is an association between rates of general practice (GP) requested CXR and lung cancer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective observational study (England) Methods: Cancer registry data for patients diagnosed with lung cancer 2014-2018 was linked to data on GP CXRs 2013-2017. Stage at diagnosis (I/II vs III/IV) and one and five year survival (conditional on survival to one year) following diagnosis was reported by quintile of CXR rate of patients' GP with adjustment for population differences (age, smoking, prevalence of COPD and heart failure, ethnicity and deprivation) and by unadjusted category (low, medium, high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>192,631 patient records and CXR rates for 7,409 practices were obtained. Practices with highest quintile CXR rate had fewer cancers diagnosed at stage III/IV compared to lowest quintile (OR=0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92, p<0.001). The association was weaker for high unadjusted CXR category (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97). For the highest adjusted quintile HRs for death within one year and five years were 0.92 (0.90-0.95), p<0.001) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99, p=0.023) respectively. For the high unadjusted CXR category the HR for one year survival was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99, p=0.004) with no association demonstrated for five year survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients registered at GPs with higher CXR use have a favourable stage distribution and slightly better survival. This supports use of CXR in promoting earlier diagnosis of symptomatic lung cancer in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General Practice chest x-ray rate is associated with earlier lung cancer diagnosis and reduced all-cause mortality: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen H Bradley, Richard Neal, Matthew Callister, Benjamin Cornwell, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Bethany Shinkins, Richard Hubbard, Matthew Barclay\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on whether general practice rates of investigation in symptomatic patients using chest x-ray (CXR) affects outcomes is equivocal.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Determine if there is an association between rates of general practice (GP) requested CXR and lung cancer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective observational study (England) Methods: Cancer registry data for patients diagnosed with lung cancer 2014-2018 was linked to data on GP CXRs 2013-2017. Stage at diagnosis (I/II vs III/IV) and one and five year survival (conditional on survival to one year) following diagnosis was reported by quintile of CXR rate of patients' GP with adjustment for population differences (age, smoking, prevalence of COPD and heart failure, ethnicity and deprivation) and by unadjusted category (low, medium, high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>192,631 patient records and CXR rates for 7,409 practices were obtained. Practices with highest quintile CXR rate had fewer cancers diagnosed at stage III/IV compared to lowest quintile (OR=0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92, p<0.001). The association was weaker for high unadjusted CXR category (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97). For the highest adjusted quintile HRs for death within one year and five years were 0.92 (0.90-0.95), p<0.001) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99, p=0.023) respectively. For the high unadjusted CXR category the HR for one year survival was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99, p=0.004) with no association demonstrated for five year survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients registered at GPs with higher CXR use have a favourable stage distribution and slightly better survival. This supports use of CXR in promoting earlier diagnosis of symptomatic lung cancer in general practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0466\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在有症状的患者中使用胸部x线(CXR)调查的一般实践率是否影响结果的证据是模棱两可的。目的:确定全科医生(GP)要求的CXR率与肺癌结局之间是否存在关联。设计和背景:回顾性观察性研究(英国)方法:将2014-2018年诊断为肺癌的患者的癌症登记数据与2013-2017年GP cxr数据相关联。诊断阶段(I/II vs III/IV)和诊断后1年和5年生存率(以生存至1年为条件)通过患者GP的CXR率的五分位数(调整人群差异(年龄、吸烟、COPD和心力衰竭患病率、种族和贫困)和未调整的类别(低、中、高)报告。结果:共获得192,631例患者记录和7409例的CXR率。与最低的五分位数相比,最高五分位数CXR率的诊所在III/IV期诊断出的癌症较少(OR=0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92)。结论:在高CXR使用率的全科医生登记的患者有良好的分期分布和稍好的生存率。这支持在一般实践中使用CXR促进症状性肺癌的早期诊断。
General Practice chest x-ray rate is associated with earlier lung cancer diagnosis and reduced all-cause mortality: a retrospective observational study.
Background: Evidence on whether general practice rates of investigation in symptomatic patients using chest x-ray (CXR) affects outcomes is equivocal.
Aim: Determine if there is an association between rates of general practice (GP) requested CXR and lung cancer outcomes.
Design and setting: Retrospective observational study (England) Methods: Cancer registry data for patients diagnosed with lung cancer 2014-2018 was linked to data on GP CXRs 2013-2017. Stage at diagnosis (I/II vs III/IV) and one and five year survival (conditional on survival to one year) following diagnosis was reported by quintile of CXR rate of patients' GP with adjustment for population differences (age, smoking, prevalence of COPD and heart failure, ethnicity and deprivation) and by unadjusted category (low, medium, high).
Results: 192,631 patient records and CXR rates for 7,409 practices were obtained. Practices with highest quintile CXR rate had fewer cancers diagnosed at stage III/IV compared to lowest quintile (OR=0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92, p<0.001). The association was weaker for high unadjusted CXR category (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97). For the highest adjusted quintile HRs for death within one year and five years were 0.92 (0.90-0.95), p<0.001) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99, p=0.023) respectively. For the high unadjusted CXR category the HR for one year survival was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99, p=0.004) with no association demonstrated for five year survival.
Conclusions: Patients registered at GPs with higher CXR use have a favourable stage distribution and slightly better survival. This supports use of CXR in promoting earlier diagnosis of symptomatic lung cancer in general practice.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.