护士的工作场所暴力报告行为和不正式报告的原因:横断面二次分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jenny Lee, Farinaz Havaei, Saima Hirani, Nassim Adhami
{"title":"护士的工作场所暴力报告行为和不正式报告的原因:横断面二次分析。","authors":"Jenny Lee, Farinaz Havaei, Saima Hirani, Nassim Adhami","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate predictors of nurses' reporting behaviours and their reasons for not formally reporting.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Underreporting of workplace violence (WPV) among nurses contributes to gaps in WPV prevention measures, as it cannot be fully understood. WPV is classified according to its source (Type II: patients and visitors, Type III: coworkers) and forms (physical assault, threat of assault, emotional abuse, verbal sexual harassment and sexual assault).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data collected in 2019 from British Columbia (BC), Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a sample of 4109 BC nurses. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse predictors of reporting behaviours. Reasons for not reporting were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informal reporting to management or through a patient safety incident report was less likely when nurses experienced threat of assault, emotional abuse and verbal sexual harassment from both Type II and III sources and physical assault from Type III sources. Higher perceptions of WPV prevention efforts increased odds of informal and formal reporting through employee incident procedures. Believing that nothing would change after reporting remained among the top three reasons for not formally reporting across all WPV sources and forms. Nurses also commonly selected not knowing the formal process, lack of leadership support and other reasons stated in an open-text response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate that nurses in BC, Canada, perceive many barriers to formal WPV reporting. Formal reporting systems should address these barriers so that healthcare organisations can effectively track WPV and have data to inform WPV prevention measures.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>To promote WPV reporting, healthcare organisations need multifaceted interventions including confidential and simplified reporting systems, leadership support to follow-up with nurses and education and training on reporting systems.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The authors of this manuscript have adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines based on the STROBE cross-sectional reporting method.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Workplace Violence Reporting Behaviours and Reasons for Not Formally Reporting: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Lee, Farinaz Havaei, Saima Hirani, Nassim Adhami\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate predictors of nurses' reporting behaviours and their reasons for not formally reporting.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Underreporting of workplace violence (WPV) among nurses contributes to gaps in WPV prevention measures, as it cannot be fully understood. WPV is classified according to its source (Type II: patients and visitors, Type III: coworkers) and forms (physical assault, threat of assault, emotional abuse, verbal sexual harassment and sexual assault).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data collected in 2019 from British Columbia (BC), Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a sample of 4109 BC nurses. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse predictors of reporting behaviours. Reasons for not reporting were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informal reporting to management or through a patient safety incident report was less likely when nurses experienced threat of assault, emotional abuse and verbal sexual harassment from both Type II and III sources and physical assault from Type III sources. Higher perceptions of WPV prevention efforts increased odds of informal and formal reporting through employee incident procedures. Believing that nothing would change after reporting remained among the top three reasons for not formally reporting across all WPV sources and forms. Nurses also commonly selected not knowing the formal process, lack of leadership support and other reasons stated in an open-text response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate that nurses in BC, Canada, perceive many barriers to formal WPV reporting. Formal reporting systems should address these barriers so that healthcare organisations can effectively track WPV and have data to inform WPV prevention measures.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>To promote WPV reporting, healthcare organisations need multifaceted interventions including confidential and simplified reporting systems, leadership support to follow-up with nurses and education and training on reporting systems.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The authors of this manuscript have adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines based on the STROBE cross-sectional reporting method.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨护士报告行为的预测因素及其不正式报告的原因。背景:护士工作场所暴力(WPV)的漏报导致了WPV预防措施的空白,因为它不能完全理解。WPV根据其来源(第二类:患者和访客,第三类:同事)和形式(身体攻击、攻击威胁、情感虐待、言语性骚扰和性侵犯)进行分类。设计:这是对2019年从加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)收集的横断面调查数据的二次分析。方法:对公元前4109名护士进行抽样调查。采用多项逻辑回归分析报告行为的预测因子。对未报告的原因进行了描述性分析。结果:当护士遭受来自第二类和第三类来源的攻击威胁、情感虐待和言语性骚扰以及来自第三类来源的身体攻击时,向管理层非正式报告或通过患者安全事件报告的可能性较小。对WPV预防工作的更高认识增加了通过员工事件程序进行非正式和正式报告的几率。认为报告后什么都不会改变仍然是不正式报告所有WPV来源和形式的三大原因之一。护士还通常选择不知道正式程序,缺乏领导支持和其他原因在开放式文本回复中陈述。结论:研究结果表明,加拿大BC省的护士认为正式报告WPV存在许多障碍。正式的报告系统应该解决这些障碍,以便卫生保健组织能够有效地跟踪野生脊灰病毒,并拥有数据来通知野生脊灰病毒预防措施。启示:为了促进WPV报告,医疗机构需要多方面的干预措施,包括保密和简化的报告系统,领导支持护士的后续工作,以及报告系统的教育和培训。报告方法:本文作者遵循相关EQUATOR指南,采用STROBE横断面报告方法。患者或公众捐款:没有患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' Workplace Violence Reporting Behaviours and Reasons for Not Formally Reporting: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis.

Aim: To investigate predictors of nurses' reporting behaviours and their reasons for not formally reporting.

Background: Underreporting of workplace violence (WPV) among nurses contributes to gaps in WPV prevention measures, as it cannot be fully understood. WPV is classified according to its source (Type II: patients and visitors, Type III: coworkers) and forms (physical assault, threat of assault, emotional abuse, verbal sexual harassment and sexual assault).

Design: This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data collected in 2019 from British Columbia (BC), Canada.

Methods: This study had a sample of 4109 BC nurses. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse predictors of reporting behaviours. Reasons for not reporting were analysed descriptively.

Results: Informal reporting to management or through a patient safety incident report was less likely when nurses experienced threat of assault, emotional abuse and verbal sexual harassment from both Type II and III sources and physical assault from Type III sources. Higher perceptions of WPV prevention efforts increased odds of informal and formal reporting through employee incident procedures. Believing that nothing would change after reporting remained among the top three reasons for not formally reporting across all WPV sources and forms. Nurses also commonly selected not knowing the formal process, lack of leadership support and other reasons stated in an open-text response.

Conclusion: Findings indicate that nurses in BC, Canada, perceive many barriers to formal WPV reporting. Formal reporting systems should address these barriers so that healthcare organisations can effectively track WPV and have data to inform WPV prevention measures.

Implications: To promote WPV reporting, healthcare organisations need multifaceted interventions including confidential and simplified reporting systems, leadership support to follow-up with nurses and education and training on reporting systems.

Reporting method: The authors of this manuscript have adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines based on the STROBE cross-sectional reporting method.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信